- This topic has 295 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 14, 2007 at 5:07 PM #117498December 14, 2007 at 5:20 PM #117287kev374Participant
Ok, how many of you would vote for this guy and how many of you think he could actually win?
I *THINK* would vote for him but first have to know more about him that what appears on the surface.
However, about him winning, I don’t know about that. The American public is notorious for being the most idiotic there is, after all they voted for Bush, not once but TWICE!
December 14, 2007 at 5:20 PM #117418kev374ParticipantOk, how many of you would vote for this guy and how many of you think he could actually win?
I *THINK* would vote for him but first have to know more about him that what appears on the surface.
However, about him winning, I don’t know about that. The American public is notorious for being the most idiotic there is, after all they voted for Bush, not once but TWICE!
December 14, 2007 at 5:20 PM #117454kev374ParticipantOk, how many of you would vote for this guy and how many of you think he could actually win?
I *THINK* would vote for him but first have to know more about him that what appears on the surface.
However, about him winning, I don’t know about that. The American public is notorious for being the most idiotic there is, after all they voted for Bush, not once but TWICE!
December 14, 2007 at 5:20 PM #117496kev374ParticipantOk, how many of you would vote for this guy and how many of you think he could actually win?
I *THINK* would vote for him but first have to know more about him that what appears on the surface.
However, about him winning, I don’t know about that. The American public is notorious for being the most idiotic there is, after all they voted for Bush, not once but TWICE!
December 14, 2007 at 5:20 PM #117513kev374ParticipantOk, how many of you would vote for this guy and how many of you think he could actually win?
I *THINK* would vote for him but first have to know more about him that what appears on the surface.
However, about him winning, I don’t know about that. The American public is notorious for being the most idiotic there is, after all they voted for Bush, not once but TWICE!
December 14, 2007 at 5:29 PM #117307Allan from FallbrookParticipantkev: And, as evidenced by some of the comments on this thread, the strength of the wedge issue persists. God forbid anyone spend the time necessary to educate themselves on the issues; rather, let’s focus on single issues and lose sight of the big picture.
That is what got Bush elected twice: The ability of Rove to create divisive wedge issues that diverted focus, and allowed for an effective divide and conquer strategy.
There is not a single candidate out there right now that has offered a more honest, and pragmatic, view of what confronts us right now than Ron Paul. And I consider this guy a fringe player (based on his politics and voting record). I wouldn’t vote for any of the Republican candidates (other than Paul) and certainly none of the Democrats.
December 14, 2007 at 5:29 PM #117436Allan from FallbrookParticipantkev: And, as evidenced by some of the comments on this thread, the strength of the wedge issue persists. God forbid anyone spend the time necessary to educate themselves on the issues; rather, let’s focus on single issues and lose sight of the big picture.
That is what got Bush elected twice: The ability of Rove to create divisive wedge issues that diverted focus, and allowed for an effective divide and conquer strategy.
There is not a single candidate out there right now that has offered a more honest, and pragmatic, view of what confronts us right now than Ron Paul. And I consider this guy a fringe player (based on his politics and voting record). I wouldn’t vote for any of the Republican candidates (other than Paul) and certainly none of the Democrats.
December 14, 2007 at 5:29 PM #117471Allan from FallbrookParticipantkev: And, as evidenced by some of the comments on this thread, the strength of the wedge issue persists. God forbid anyone spend the time necessary to educate themselves on the issues; rather, let’s focus on single issues and lose sight of the big picture.
That is what got Bush elected twice: The ability of Rove to create divisive wedge issues that diverted focus, and allowed for an effective divide and conquer strategy.
There is not a single candidate out there right now that has offered a more honest, and pragmatic, view of what confronts us right now than Ron Paul. And I consider this guy a fringe player (based on his politics and voting record). I wouldn’t vote for any of the Republican candidates (other than Paul) and certainly none of the Democrats.
December 14, 2007 at 5:29 PM #117515Allan from FallbrookParticipantkev: And, as evidenced by some of the comments on this thread, the strength of the wedge issue persists. God forbid anyone spend the time necessary to educate themselves on the issues; rather, let’s focus on single issues and lose sight of the big picture.
That is what got Bush elected twice: The ability of Rove to create divisive wedge issues that diverted focus, and allowed for an effective divide and conquer strategy.
There is not a single candidate out there right now that has offered a more honest, and pragmatic, view of what confronts us right now than Ron Paul. And I consider this guy a fringe player (based on his politics and voting record). I wouldn’t vote for any of the Republican candidates (other than Paul) and certainly none of the Democrats.
December 14, 2007 at 5:29 PM #117531Allan from FallbrookParticipantkev: And, as evidenced by some of the comments on this thread, the strength of the wedge issue persists. God forbid anyone spend the time necessary to educate themselves on the issues; rather, let’s focus on single issues and lose sight of the big picture.
That is what got Bush elected twice: The ability of Rove to create divisive wedge issues that diverted focus, and allowed for an effective divide and conquer strategy.
There is not a single candidate out there right now that has offered a more honest, and pragmatic, view of what confronts us right now than Ron Paul. And I consider this guy a fringe player (based on his politics and voting record). I wouldn’t vote for any of the Republican candidates (other than Paul) and certainly none of the Democrats.
December 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #117282pbnativeParticipantHe believes that this issue is for the states to decide.
I disagree with that, but I will change my statement:
If he thinks *anyone but me* should be able to control what goes on inside my very own body, I’m confident that he would attempt to control my right to a vote, free speech, atheism, security, etc. I will not vote for him.
You must look at all the issues facing the nation right now and see how each candidate will handle it.
I take your point, but this one is a show-stopper. I disagree with all of them on some points, but this position is unacceptable for me.
December 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #117413pbnativeParticipantHe believes that this issue is for the states to decide.
I disagree with that, but I will change my statement:
If he thinks *anyone but me* should be able to control what goes on inside my very own body, I’m confident that he would attempt to control my right to a vote, free speech, atheism, security, etc. I will not vote for him.
You must look at all the issues facing the nation right now and see how each candidate will handle it.
I take your point, but this one is a show-stopper. I disagree with all of them on some points, but this position is unacceptable for me.
December 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #117449pbnativeParticipantHe believes that this issue is for the states to decide.
I disagree with that, but I will change my statement:
If he thinks *anyone but me* should be able to control what goes on inside my very own body, I’m confident that he would attempt to control my right to a vote, free speech, atheism, security, etc. I will not vote for him.
You must look at all the issues facing the nation right now and see how each candidate will handle it.
I take your point, but this one is a show-stopper. I disagree with all of them on some points, but this position is unacceptable for me.
December 14, 2007 at 5:33 PM #117490pbnativeParticipantHe believes that this issue is for the states to decide.
I disagree with that, but I will change my statement:
If he thinks *anyone but me* should be able to control what goes on inside my very own body, I’m confident that he would attempt to control my right to a vote, free speech, atheism, security, etc. I will not vote for him.
You must look at all the issues facing the nation right now and see how each candidate will handle it.
I take your point, but this one is a show-stopper. I disagree with all of them on some points, but this position is unacceptable for me.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.