- This topic has 295 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 15, 2007 at 1:27 PM #118099December 15, 2007 at 3:43 PM #117946
Arraya
Participant“One topic I would be interested in following up on would be the state of the world following the US exit from Iraq”
We will never leave Iraq, unless we are forced out or they run out of oil. All moves on the geo-political chess board from this time foward will be to secure the ever dewindiling oil supplies.
December 15, 2007 at 3:43 PM #118079Arraya
Participant“One topic I would be interested in following up on would be the state of the world following the US exit from Iraq”
We will never leave Iraq, unless we are forced out or they run out of oil. All moves on the geo-political chess board from this time foward will be to secure the ever dewindiling oil supplies.
December 15, 2007 at 3:43 PM #118112Arraya
Participant“One topic I would be interested in following up on would be the state of the world following the US exit from Iraq”
We will never leave Iraq, unless we are forced out or they run out of oil. All moves on the geo-political chess board from this time foward will be to secure the ever dewindiling oil supplies.
December 15, 2007 at 3:43 PM #118152Arraya
Participant“One topic I would be interested in following up on would be the state of the world following the US exit from Iraq”
We will never leave Iraq, unless we are forced out or they run out of oil. All moves on the geo-political chess board from this time foward will be to secure the ever dewindiling oil supplies.
December 15, 2007 at 3:43 PM #118174Arraya
Participant“One topic I would be interested in following up on would be the state of the world following the US exit from Iraq”
We will never leave Iraq, unless we are forced out or they run out of oil. All moves on the geo-political chess board from this time foward will be to secure the ever dewindiling oil supplies.
December 15, 2007 at 10:30 PM #117972NotCranky
ParticipantI’ll get back with you later Allan.
December 15, 2007 at 10:30 PM #118105NotCranky
ParticipantI’ll get back with you later Allan.
December 15, 2007 at 10:30 PM #118137NotCranky
ParticipantI’ll get back with you later Allan.
December 15, 2007 at 10:30 PM #118177NotCranky
ParticipantI’ll get back with you later Allan.
December 15, 2007 at 10:30 PM #118200NotCranky
ParticipantI’ll get back with you later Allan.
December 16, 2007 at 12:08 AM #118191CardiffBaseball
ParticipantFor the ones claiming abortion to be a deciding factor, I am curious if that is the only thing keeping you from looking at Ron Paul? First my bias is that I am not a country-club pubbie, or a social conservative pubbie, but lean more to the libertarian “live and let live” type of conservative.
I agree with your position and do not agree with the standard GOP party line on abortion. However I have not cared enough about that one issue to make me vote Democrat. Thus in my mind if I otherwise agree with very little coming out of that party, it seems I can overlook that one issue. This is clearly a wedge issue that seems to drive a voter one way or the other.
December 16, 2007 at 12:08 AM #118325CardiffBaseball
ParticipantFor the ones claiming abortion to be a deciding factor, I am curious if that is the only thing keeping you from looking at Ron Paul? First my bias is that I am not a country-club pubbie, or a social conservative pubbie, but lean more to the libertarian “live and let live” type of conservative.
I agree with your position and do not agree with the standard GOP party line on abortion. However I have not cared enough about that one issue to make me vote Democrat. Thus in my mind if I otherwise agree with very little coming out of that party, it seems I can overlook that one issue. This is clearly a wedge issue that seems to drive a voter one way or the other.
December 16, 2007 at 12:08 AM #118359CardiffBaseball
ParticipantFor the ones claiming abortion to be a deciding factor, I am curious if that is the only thing keeping you from looking at Ron Paul? First my bias is that I am not a country-club pubbie, or a social conservative pubbie, but lean more to the libertarian “live and let live” type of conservative.
I agree with your position and do not agree with the standard GOP party line on abortion. However I have not cared enough about that one issue to make me vote Democrat. Thus in my mind if I otherwise agree with very little coming out of that party, it seems I can overlook that one issue. This is clearly a wedge issue that seems to drive a voter one way or the other.
December 16, 2007 at 12:08 AM #118397CardiffBaseball
ParticipantFor the ones claiming abortion to be a deciding factor, I am curious if that is the only thing keeping you from looking at Ron Paul? First my bias is that I am not a country-club pubbie, or a social conservative pubbie, but lean more to the libertarian “live and let live” type of conservative.
I agree with your position and do not agree with the standard GOP party line on abortion. However I have not cared enough about that one issue to make me vote Democrat. Thus in my mind if I otherwise agree with very little coming out of that party, it seems I can overlook that one issue. This is clearly a wedge issue that seems to drive a voter one way or the other.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.