- This topic has 295 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 17 years ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 14, 2007 at 6:11 PM #117566December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117357Allan from FallbrookParticipant
condogrrl: Not a huge fan of Reagan myself, especially given my experiences in the Army during his Presidency, but I have never questioned his ideological priorities.
Given the pathetic history of the Democratic Party when it comes to ideology, and the waffling of the present group of candidates on foreign policy and national security issues, almost makes one long for the Reagan years.
Almost.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117487Allan from FallbrookParticipantcondogrrl: Not a huge fan of Reagan myself, especially given my experiences in the Army during his Presidency, but I have never questioned his ideological priorities.
Given the pathetic history of the Democratic Party when it comes to ideology, and the waffling of the present group of candidates on foreign policy and national security issues, almost makes one long for the Reagan years.
Almost.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117522Allan from FallbrookParticipantcondogrrl: Not a huge fan of Reagan myself, especially given my experiences in the Army during his Presidency, but I have never questioned his ideological priorities.
Given the pathetic history of the Democratic Party when it comes to ideology, and the waffling of the present group of candidates on foreign policy and national security issues, almost makes one long for the Reagan years.
Almost.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117564Allan from FallbrookParticipantcondogrrl: Not a huge fan of Reagan myself, especially given my experiences in the Army during his Presidency, but I have never questioned his ideological priorities.
Given the pathetic history of the Democratic Party when it comes to ideology, and the waffling of the present group of candidates on foreign policy and national security issues, almost makes one long for the Reagan years.
Almost.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117581Allan from FallbrookParticipantcondogrrl: Not a huge fan of Reagan myself, especially given my experiences in the Army during his Presidency, but I have never questioned his ideological priorities.
Given the pathetic history of the Democratic Party when it comes to ideology, and the waffling of the present group of candidates on foreign policy and national security issues, almost makes one long for the Reagan years.
Almost.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117352AnonymousGuestIf anybody other than Ron Paul gets in you will have to worry about people controlling your rights a lot more.
Ron Paul is for the decriminilisation of all drugs restoring all rights, repealing the patriot act, ending the unjust war, legalising all prositution and gambling and basically allowing anything so long as it does not harm anybody else, almost in line with classic libertarian thinking. No other candidate offers any of this.
I understand what you feel personally about abortion, but just so you know, Ron Paul is not a typical politian trying to regulate your body and force you to live by his rules, but he believes that the abortion question fundamentally ties into the issue of liberty. Liberty is all about people being free and not being allowed to hurt other people. Ron Paul just views the unborn as a life and therefore sees it as a question essential to liberty, that of giving the unborn feotus the right to life and liberty.
Now I’m personally not against abortions in the early stages but I admire and respect Ron Paul and wanted to make sure you understood his position fully. Also, he doesn’t want the federal goverment banning it, just the states deciding more locally. You probably agree it is a very difficult issue.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117482AnonymousGuestIf anybody other than Ron Paul gets in you will have to worry about people controlling your rights a lot more.
Ron Paul is for the decriminilisation of all drugs restoring all rights, repealing the patriot act, ending the unjust war, legalising all prositution and gambling and basically allowing anything so long as it does not harm anybody else, almost in line with classic libertarian thinking. No other candidate offers any of this.
I understand what you feel personally about abortion, but just so you know, Ron Paul is not a typical politian trying to regulate your body and force you to live by his rules, but he believes that the abortion question fundamentally ties into the issue of liberty. Liberty is all about people being free and not being allowed to hurt other people. Ron Paul just views the unborn as a life and therefore sees it as a question essential to liberty, that of giving the unborn feotus the right to life and liberty.
Now I’m personally not against abortions in the early stages but I admire and respect Ron Paul and wanted to make sure you understood his position fully. Also, he doesn’t want the federal goverment banning it, just the states deciding more locally. You probably agree it is a very difficult issue.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117516AnonymousGuestIf anybody other than Ron Paul gets in you will have to worry about people controlling your rights a lot more.
Ron Paul is for the decriminilisation of all drugs restoring all rights, repealing the patriot act, ending the unjust war, legalising all prositution and gambling and basically allowing anything so long as it does not harm anybody else, almost in line with classic libertarian thinking. No other candidate offers any of this.
I understand what you feel personally about abortion, but just so you know, Ron Paul is not a typical politian trying to regulate your body and force you to live by his rules, but he believes that the abortion question fundamentally ties into the issue of liberty. Liberty is all about people being free and not being allowed to hurt other people. Ron Paul just views the unborn as a life and therefore sees it as a question essential to liberty, that of giving the unborn feotus the right to life and liberty.
Now I’m personally not against abortions in the early stages but I admire and respect Ron Paul and wanted to make sure you understood his position fully. Also, he doesn’t want the federal goverment banning it, just the states deciding more locally. You probably agree it is a very difficult issue.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117559AnonymousGuestIf anybody other than Ron Paul gets in you will have to worry about people controlling your rights a lot more.
Ron Paul is for the decriminilisation of all drugs restoring all rights, repealing the patriot act, ending the unjust war, legalising all prositution and gambling and basically allowing anything so long as it does not harm anybody else, almost in line with classic libertarian thinking. No other candidate offers any of this.
I understand what you feel personally about abortion, but just so you know, Ron Paul is not a typical politian trying to regulate your body and force you to live by his rules, but he believes that the abortion question fundamentally ties into the issue of liberty. Liberty is all about people being free and not being allowed to hurt other people. Ron Paul just views the unborn as a life and therefore sees it as a question essential to liberty, that of giving the unborn feotus the right to life and liberty.
Now I’m personally not against abortions in the early stages but I admire and respect Ron Paul and wanted to make sure you understood his position fully. Also, he doesn’t want the federal goverment banning it, just the states deciding more locally. You probably agree it is a very difficult issue.
December 14, 2007 at 6:17 PM #117576AnonymousGuestIf anybody other than Ron Paul gets in you will have to worry about people controlling your rights a lot more.
Ron Paul is for the decriminilisation of all drugs restoring all rights, repealing the patriot act, ending the unjust war, legalising all prositution and gambling and basically allowing anything so long as it does not harm anybody else, almost in line with classic libertarian thinking. No other candidate offers any of this.
I understand what you feel personally about abortion, but just so you know, Ron Paul is not a typical politian trying to regulate your body and force you to live by his rules, but he believes that the abortion question fundamentally ties into the issue of liberty. Liberty is all about people being free and not being allowed to hurt other people. Ron Paul just views the unborn as a life and therefore sees it as a question essential to liberty, that of giving the unborn feotus the right to life and liberty.
Now I’m personally not against abortions in the early stages but I admire and respect Ron Paul and wanted to make sure you understood his position fully. Also, he doesn’t want the federal goverment banning it, just the states deciding more locally. You probably agree it is a very difficult issue.
December 14, 2007 at 6:29 PM #117367NotCrankyParticipantHi Allan,
A friend of mine was talking about how Reagan created the bubble in the defense industry specifically aerospace that lead to the SOCAL economy, including housing that wasn’t really incredibly overheated, to suffer a fairly severe setback in the late 1980’s. IF you get back on this thread could you let me know what you think on that topic. thanks. If this is true was he beholden to some profiteers as politicians often are?BTW please be patient with me, what I lack in spelling grammar, punctuation and social etiquette I make up for integrity, depth, and concern for my fellow man.I am also no dummy. In exchange I will be patient with you for having expectations that others meet your ideals to qualify as “the right kind”.
December 14, 2007 at 6:29 PM #117497NotCrankyParticipantHi Allan,
A friend of mine was talking about how Reagan created the bubble in the defense industry specifically aerospace that lead to the SOCAL economy, including housing that wasn’t really incredibly overheated, to suffer a fairly severe setback in the late 1980’s. IF you get back on this thread could you let me know what you think on that topic. thanks. If this is true was he beholden to some profiteers as politicians often are?BTW please be patient with me, what I lack in spelling grammar, punctuation and social etiquette I make up for integrity, depth, and concern for my fellow man.I am also no dummy. In exchange I will be patient with you for having expectations that others meet your ideals to qualify as “the right kind”.
December 14, 2007 at 6:29 PM #117532NotCrankyParticipantHi Allan,
A friend of mine was talking about how Reagan created the bubble in the defense industry specifically aerospace that lead to the SOCAL economy, including housing that wasn’t really incredibly overheated, to suffer a fairly severe setback in the late 1980’s. IF you get back on this thread could you let me know what you think on that topic. thanks. If this is true was he beholden to some profiteers as politicians often are?BTW please be patient with me, what I lack in spelling grammar, punctuation and social etiquette I make up for integrity, depth, and concern for my fellow man.I am also no dummy. In exchange I will be patient with you for having expectations that others meet your ideals to qualify as “the right kind”.
December 14, 2007 at 6:29 PM #117575NotCrankyParticipantHi Allan,
A friend of mine was talking about how Reagan created the bubble in the defense industry specifically aerospace that lead to the SOCAL economy, including housing that wasn’t really incredibly overheated, to suffer a fairly severe setback in the late 1980’s. IF you get back on this thread could you let me know what you think on that topic. thanks. If this is true was he beholden to some profiteers as politicians often are?BTW please be patient with me, what I lack in spelling grammar, punctuation and social etiquette I make up for integrity, depth, and concern for my fellow man.I am also no dummy. In exchange I will be patient with you for having expectations that others meet your ideals to qualify as “the right kind”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.