Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Kucinich has gone insane
- This topic has 260 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by
sobmaz.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 24, 2010 at 12:34 PM #645765December 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM #644661
Arraya
Participant[quote=justme][quote=walterwhite]I thought the banks were already nationalized. What’s the difference?[/quote]
It’s the other way around. The banks nationalized the US people.[/quote]
No, I think you mean the American people were “privatized”
December 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM #644733Arraya
Participant[quote=justme][quote=walterwhite]I thought the banks were already nationalized. What’s the difference?[/quote]
It’s the other way around. The banks nationalized the US people.[/quote]
No, I think you mean the American people were “privatized”
December 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM #645311Arraya
Participant[quote=justme][quote=walterwhite]I thought the banks were already nationalized. What’s the difference?[/quote]
It’s the other way around. The banks nationalized the US people.[/quote]
No, I think you mean the American people were “privatized”
December 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM #645449Arraya
Participant[quote=justme][quote=walterwhite]I thought the banks were already nationalized. What’s the difference?[/quote]
It’s the other way around. The banks nationalized the US people.[/quote]
No, I think you mean the American people were “privatized”
December 24, 2010 at 12:57 PM #645770Arraya
Participant[quote=justme][quote=walterwhite]I thought the banks were already nationalized. What’s the difference?[/quote]
It’s the other way around. The banks nationalized the US people.[/quote]
No, I think you mean the American people were “privatized”
December 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM #644676patb
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]How can anyone possibly consisder supporting the ides “hey, lets put the politicians in charge of the money supply”
Really ? Politicians ?[/quote]
Really? Bankers?
December 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM #644748patb
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]How can anyone possibly consisder supporting the ides “hey, lets put the politicians in charge of the money supply”
Really ? Politicians ?[/quote]
Really? Bankers?
December 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM #645326patb
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]How can anyone possibly consisder supporting the ides “hey, lets put the politicians in charge of the money supply”
Really ? Politicians ?[/quote]
Really? Bankers?
December 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM #645464patb
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]How can anyone possibly consisder supporting the ides “hey, lets put the politicians in charge of the money supply”
Really ? Politicians ?[/quote]
Really? Bankers?
December 24, 2010 at 1:17 PM #645785patb
Participant[quote=sdduuuude]How can anyone possibly consisder supporting the ides “hey, lets put the politicians in charge of the money supply”
Really ? Politicians ?[/quote]
Really? Bankers?
December 24, 2010 at 1:21 PM #644681patb
Participant[quote=jeeman]”under the kucinich plan, if a bank has $10 on deposit they lend out $10.”
And then the person who borrowed that $10 could end up lending it out to someone….[/quote]
Yes but the system is 100% M1 and not 90% M3
December 24, 2010 at 1:21 PM #644753patb
Participant[quote=jeeman]”under the kucinich plan, if a bank has $10 on deposit they lend out $10.”
And then the person who borrowed that $10 could end up lending it out to someone….[/quote]
Yes but the system is 100% M1 and not 90% M3
December 24, 2010 at 1:21 PM #645331patb
Participant[quote=jeeman]”under the kucinich plan, if a bank has $10 on deposit they lend out $10.”
And then the person who borrowed that $10 could end up lending it out to someone….[/quote]
Yes but the system is 100% M1 and not 90% M3
December 24, 2010 at 1:21 PM #645469patb
Participant[quote=jeeman]”under the kucinich plan, if a bank has $10 on deposit they lend out $10.”
And then the person who borrowed that $10 could end up lending it out to someone….[/quote]
Yes but the system is 100% M1 and not 90% M3
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.