Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Jeremy Grantham’s 1Q09 Letter: Fantastic as usual
- This topic has 200 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM #397434May 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM #396778
jpinpb
Participantdavelj, thanks for posting it.
May 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM #397029Participantdavelj, thanks for posting it.
May 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM #397252Participantdavelj, thanks for posting it.
May 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM #397311Participantdavelj, thanks for posting it.
May 11, 2009 at 8:50 PM #397454Participantdavelj, thanks for posting it.
May 11, 2009 at 8:57 PM #396798paramount
ParticipantTG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
May 11, 2009 at 8:57 PM #397050ParticipantTG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
May 11, 2009 at 8:57 PM #397272ParticipantTG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
May 11, 2009 at 8:57 PM #397331ParticipantTG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
May 11, 2009 at 8:57 PM #397474ParticipantTG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
May 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM #396813patientrenter
Participant[quote=paramount]TG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
[/quote]
And Mr Grantham already factors the underlying weaknesses in our economy into his forecasts. That’s why he thinks the recovery will be VL. A small bounce now, and then a long grind without much sunshine. But he thinks markets will over-react, and zoom up over the rest of the year, and then only slowly deflate in small steps over the next seven or so years that will likely not retrace the low of March any time soon.
Read it. It’s worth the time.
May 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM #397065Participant[quote=paramount]TG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
[/quote]
And Mr Grantham already factors the underlying weaknesses in our economy into his forecasts. That’s why he thinks the recovery will be VL. A small bounce now, and then a long grind without much sunshine. But he thinks markets will over-react, and zoom up over the rest of the year, and then only slowly deflate in small steps over the next seven or so years that will likely not retrace the low of March any time soon.
Read it. It’s worth the time.
May 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM #397287Participant[quote=paramount]TG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
[/quote]
And Mr Grantham already factors the underlying weaknesses in our economy into his forecasts. That’s why he thinks the recovery will be VL. A small bounce now, and then a long grind without much sunshine. But he thinks markets will over-react, and zoom up over the rest of the year, and then only slowly deflate in small steps over the next seven or so years that will likely not retrace the low of March any time soon.
Read it. It’s worth the time.
May 11, 2009 at 9:13 PM #397346Participant[quote=paramount]TG: You may very well get that chance again…
Has there really been a fundamental change?
Slightly less “preliminary” unemployment numbers?
The gov’t hired 70k Census workers…BFD, gov’t jobs aren’t all that helpful anyway.
Until jobs start coming from the private sector, it’s all manipulated and phony.
Even Newt Gingrich basically stated that yesterday in a Sunday morning news show.
[/quote]
And Mr Grantham already factors the underlying weaknesses in our economy into his forecasts. That’s why he thinks the recovery will be VL. A small bounce now, and then a long grind without much sunshine. But he thinks markets will over-react, and zoom up over the rest of the year, and then only slowly deflate in small steps over the next seven or so years that will likely not retrace the low of March any time soon.
Read it. It’s worth the time.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.