- This topic has 80 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by NeetaT.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2009 at 11:17 AM #16601November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #477394allParticipant
[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #478232allParticipant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #477565allParticipant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #478012allParticipant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:32 AM #477931allParticipant[quote=CardiffBaseball]
I can’t help but wonder if the Govt. disagrees and at least holds jobs for these guys, or if we thumb our noses at them after they’ve served their sentences.[/quote]
You might want to read the article again.
They are not likely to serve:[quote]All the Americans were tried in absentia and are considered fugitives.[/quote]
The top guy has retired.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #478252CardiffBaseballParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #478033CardiffBaseballParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #477951CardiffBaseballParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #477585CardiffBaseballParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM #477414CardiffBaseballParticipantI see what you mean I was looking at the sentences and missed that part. Our convictees will likely just avoid Italy and I doubt the Govt. would track them down and turn them it.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #477634ucodegenParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #478001ucodegenParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #478082ucodegenParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
November 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM #478301ucodegenParticipantItalian justice is a joke.
Italian state did not want to press extradition, but the prosecutors went on ahead for ‘show'(make it look like they are doing something while not dealing with needed prosecutions within Italy)
The Italian ‘co-conspirators’ were not tried because “all evidence of coordination between the Italian secret services and the C.I.A. violated state secrecy rules and was therefore inadmissible in the trial”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.