- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by pemeliza.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM #17091February 21, 2010 at 10:08 PM #516335cantabParticipant
Interesting house. For pix and details see http://www.redfin.com/CA/La-Jolla/Undisclosed-address-92037/home/5135949
It looks like it hasn’t been improved since being built in 1975. The lot is big but taken up by a tennis court. The house is 3072 sqft but 800 of that is one cavernous family room. The location is a couple of houses from 92109, on a through street, with little view if any. Judging from the photos, the selling agent was bad at marketing
I’d say this house was a bargain for the purchaser, but only if s/he happens to like it the way it is now.
February 21, 2010 at 10:08 PM #516480cantabParticipantInteresting house. For pix and details see http://www.redfin.com/CA/La-Jolla/Undisclosed-address-92037/home/5135949
It looks like it hasn’t been improved since being built in 1975. The lot is big but taken up by a tennis court. The house is 3072 sqft but 800 of that is one cavernous family room. The location is a couple of houses from 92109, on a through street, with little view if any. Judging from the photos, the selling agent was bad at marketing
I’d say this house was a bargain for the purchaser, but only if s/he happens to like it the way it is now.
February 21, 2010 at 10:08 PM #516910cantabParticipantInteresting house. For pix and details see http://www.redfin.com/CA/La-Jolla/Undisclosed-address-92037/home/5135949
It looks like it hasn’t been improved since being built in 1975. The lot is big but taken up by a tennis court. The house is 3072 sqft but 800 of that is one cavernous family room. The location is a couple of houses from 92109, on a through street, with little view if any. Judging from the photos, the selling agent was bad at marketing
I’d say this house was a bargain for the purchaser, but only if s/he happens to like it the way it is now.
February 21, 2010 at 10:08 PM #517003cantabParticipantInteresting house. For pix and details see http://www.redfin.com/CA/La-Jolla/Undisclosed-address-92037/home/5135949
It looks like it hasn’t been improved since being built in 1975. The lot is big but taken up by a tennis court. The house is 3072 sqft but 800 of that is one cavernous family room. The location is a couple of houses from 92109, on a through street, with little view if any. Judging from the photos, the selling agent was bad at marketing
I’d say this house was a bargain for the purchaser, but only if s/he happens to like it the way it is now.
February 21, 2010 at 10:08 PM #517256cantabParticipantInteresting house. For pix and details see http://www.redfin.com/CA/La-Jolla/Undisclosed-address-92037/home/5135949
It looks like it hasn’t been improved since being built in 1975. The lot is big but taken up by a tennis court. The house is 3072 sqft but 800 of that is one cavernous family room. The location is a couple of houses from 92109, on a through street, with little view if any. Judging from the photos, the selling agent was bad at marketing
I’d say this house was a bargain for the purchaser, but only if s/he happens to like it the way it is now.
February 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM #516423pemelizaParticipantLooks like a 2001 price. The downside is the busy street.
February 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM #516567pemelizaParticipantLooks like a 2001 price. The downside is the busy street.
February 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM #516997pemelizaParticipantLooks like a 2001 price. The downside is the busy street.
February 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM #517089pemelizaParticipantLooks like a 2001 price. The downside is the busy street.
February 22, 2010 at 9:26 AM #517343pemelizaParticipantLooks like a 2001 price. The downside is the busy street.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.