- This topic has 175 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 3, 2009 at 9:36 AM #392803May 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM #392144daveljParticipant
[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
So what is the term you’d apply to someone who pontificates on credit card companies without knowing the difference between a lender and a merchant processor? And claims that credit card companies’ interest rates are usurious (in which case, profitability would be extraordinarily high) while such companies are losing money hand over fist?
Just curious.
May 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM #392407daveljParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
So what is the term you’d apply to someone who pontificates on credit card companies without knowing the difference between a lender and a merchant processor? And claims that credit card companies’ interest rates are usurious (in which case, profitability would be extraordinarily high) while such companies are losing money hand over fist?
Just curious.
May 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM #392619daveljParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
So what is the term you’d apply to someone who pontificates on credit card companies without knowing the difference between a lender and a merchant processor? And claims that credit card companies’ interest rates are usurious (in which case, profitability would be extraordinarily high) while such companies are losing money hand over fist?
Just curious.
May 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM #392671daveljParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
So what is the term you’d apply to someone who pontificates on credit card companies without knowing the difference between a lender and a merchant processor? And claims that credit card companies’ interest rates are usurious (in which case, profitability would be extraordinarily high) while such companies are losing money hand over fist?
Just curious.
May 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM #392813daveljParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
So what is the term you’d apply to someone who pontificates on credit card companies without knowing the difference between a lender and a merchant processor? And claims that credit card companies’ interest rates are usurious (in which case, profitability would be extraordinarily high) while such companies are losing money hand over fist?
Just curious.
May 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM #392149patientrenterParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
If you are right about CC debt, then you are turning down an opportunity to personally benefit – maybe by enough to transform your life – from your economic insights. Is your conviction about being right a little weaker than you’re expressing here?
May 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM #392412patientrenterParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
If you are right about CC debt, then you are turning down an opportunity to personally benefit – maybe by enough to transform your life – from your economic insights. Is your conviction about being right a little weaker than you’re expressing here?
May 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM #392624patientrenterParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
If you are right about CC debt, then you are turning down an opportunity to personally benefit – maybe by enough to transform your life – from your economic insights. Is your conviction about being right a little weaker than you’re expressing here?
May 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM #392676patientrenterParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
If you are right about CC debt, then you are turning down an opportunity to personally benefit – maybe by enough to transform your life – from your economic insights. Is your conviction about being right a little weaker than you’re expressing here?
May 3, 2009 at 10:04 AM #392818patientrenterParticipant[quote=4plexowner]stocks are for suckers and I’m not a sucker …[/quote]
If you are right about CC debt, then you are turning down an opportunity to personally benefit – maybe by enough to transform your life – from your economic insights. Is your conviction about being right a little weaker than you’re expressing here?
May 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM #3921594plexownerParticipantall about risk / reward – already rich – don’t need to take stupid risks
I’m just killing time on an anonymous blog and I write about things that interest me – not sure why you think everything I write is about making money
if I didn’t know better I’d think you were trying to get a dig in at me because you ARE a sucker and your 401K is now a 201K
May 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM #3924224plexownerParticipantall about risk / reward – already rich – don’t need to take stupid risks
I’m just killing time on an anonymous blog and I write about things that interest me – not sure why you think everything I write is about making money
if I didn’t know better I’d think you were trying to get a dig in at me because you ARE a sucker and your 401K is now a 201K
May 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM #3926344plexownerParticipantall about risk / reward – already rich – don’t need to take stupid risks
I’m just killing time on an anonymous blog and I write about things that interest me – not sure why you think everything I write is about making money
if I didn’t know better I’d think you were trying to get a dig in at me because you ARE a sucker and your 401K is now a 201K
May 3, 2009 at 10:10 AM #3926864plexownerParticipantall about risk / reward – already rich – don’t need to take stupid risks
I’m just killing time on an anonymous blog and I write about things that interest me – not sure why you think everything I write is about making money
if I didn’t know better I’d think you were trying to get a dig in at me because you ARE a sucker and your 401K is now a 201K
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.