Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Impact of Proposed high speed rail
- This topic has 165 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by EconProf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 17, 2011 at 7:55 PM #656170January 22, 2011 at 3:00 AM #657016faterikcartmanParticipant
[quote=lindismith]Any public transport that helps San Diegans is good IMO.[/quote]
LOL — that’s how they sucker people to vote for these bond issues. They help a very very small number of people but many pay for it. They are the pride and joy of hippies who don’t care that not enough people ride them to make them economical. They just know they don’t want you to have the freedom to drive your car on your own schedule and live out in the suburbs in urban sprawlsville. These projects generally make the people pushing them feel good about themselves like they are saving the earth. Eventually they’ll get around to figuring out how to force you to use them, live like sardines in dense urban areas, and restrict your freedom to use your automobile. Just be patient.
January 22, 2011 at 3:00 AM #657077faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=lindismith]Any public transport that helps San Diegans is good IMO.[/quote]
LOL — that’s how they sucker people to vote for these bond issues. They help a very very small number of people but many pay for it. They are the pride and joy of hippies who don’t care that not enough people ride them to make them economical. They just know they don’t want you to have the freedom to drive your car on your own schedule and live out in the suburbs in urban sprawlsville. These projects generally make the people pushing them feel good about themselves like they are saving the earth. Eventually they’ll get around to figuring out how to force you to use them, live like sardines in dense urban areas, and restrict your freedom to use your automobile. Just be patient.
January 22, 2011 at 3:00 AM #657676faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=lindismith]Any public transport that helps San Diegans is good IMO.[/quote]
LOL — that’s how they sucker people to vote for these bond issues. They help a very very small number of people but many pay for it. They are the pride and joy of hippies who don’t care that not enough people ride them to make them economical. They just know they don’t want you to have the freedom to drive your car on your own schedule and live out in the suburbs in urban sprawlsville. These projects generally make the people pushing them feel good about themselves like they are saving the earth. Eventually they’ll get around to figuring out how to force you to use them, live like sardines in dense urban areas, and restrict your freedom to use your automobile. Just be patient.
January 22, 2011 at 3:00 AM #657814faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=lindismith]Any public transport that helps San Diegans is good IMO.[/quote]
LOL — that’s how they sucker people to vote for these bond issues. They help a very very small number of people but many pay for it. They are the pride and joy of hippies who don’t care that not enough people ride them to make them economical. They just know they don’t want you to have the freedom to drive your car on your own schedule and live out in the suburbs in urban sprawlsville. These projects generally make the people pushing them feel good about themselves like they are saving the earth. Eventually they’ll get around to figuring out how to force you to use them, live like sardines in dense urban areas, and restrict your freedom to use your automobile. Just be patient.
January 22, 2011 at 3:00 AM #658144faterikcartmanParticipant[quote=lindismith]Any public transport that helps San Diegans is good IMO.[/quote]
LOL — that’s how they sucker people to vote for these bond issues. They help a very very small number of people but many pay for it. They are the pride and joy of hippies who don’t care that not enough people ride them to make them economical. They just know they don’t want you to have the freedom to drive your car on your own schedule and live out in the suburbs in urban sprawlsville. These projects generally make the people pushing them feel good about themselves like they are saving the earth. Eventually they’ll get around to figuring out how to force you to use them, live like sardines in dense urban areas, and restrict your freedom to use your automobile. Just be patient.
January 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM #657061DoofratParticipantI think this Simpsons song sums up California’s high speed rail. Just substitute monorail with high speed rail.
Marge: “But mainstreet’s still all cracked and broken”
Bart: “Sorry Mom, the mob has spoken”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_yLodI1CQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
January 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM #657122DoofratParticipantI think this Simpsons song sums up California’s high speed rail. Just substitute monorail with high speed rail.
Marge: “But mainstreet’s still all cracked and broken”
Bart: “Sorry Mom, the mob has spoken”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_yLodI1CQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
January 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM #657721DoofratParticipantI think this Simpsons song sums up California’s high speed rail. Just substitute monorail with high speed rail.
Marge: “But mainstreet’s still all cracked and broken”
Bart: “Sorry Mom, the mob has spoken”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_yLodI1CQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
January 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM #657859DoofratParticipantI think this Simpsons song sums up California’s high speed rail. Just substitute monorail with high speed rail.
Marge: “But mainstreet’s still all cracked and broken”
Bart: “Sorry Mom, the mob has spoken”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_yLodI1CQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
January 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM #658189DoofratParticipantI think this Simpsons song sums up California’s high speed rail. Just substitute monorail with high speed rail.
Marge: “But mainstreet’s still all cracked and broken”
Bart: “Sorry Mom, the mob has spoken”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_yLodI1CQ&feature=youtube_gdata_player
January 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM #657066briansd1GuestI actually think that Federal money should be spent on high speed rail in the North Eastern Corridor. The ridership is there so the service will make money.
Then when people see the results, places like So. Cal and Florida will want high speed rail too. But to make it viable, you need to change urban planning for density and ridership to be viable.
BTW, changing zoning density would be a boon to existing property owners because land prices will go up, especially closer to the urban core.
A downtown LA to Vegas line would work. People who fly would just take the train. The train could drop off tourists right by the freeway, behind the Strip.
BTW, Living in the city doesn’t necessarily mean living like sardines. Row houses in the city are nice and roomy.
January 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM #657127briansd1GuestI actually think that Federal money should be spent on high speed rail in the North Eastern Corridor. The ridership is there so the service will make money.
Then when people see the results, places like So. Cal and Florida will want high speed rail too. But to make it viable, you need to change urban planning for density and ridership to be viable.
BTW, changing zoning density would be a boon to existing property owners because land prices will go up, especially closer to the urban core.
A downtown LA to Vegas line would work. People who fly would just take the train. The train could drop off tourists right by the freeway, behind the Strip.
BTW, Living in the city doesn’t necessarily mean living like sardines. Row houses in the city are nice and roomy.
January 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM #657726briansd1GuestI actually think that Federal money should be spent on high speed rail in the North Eastern Corridor. The ridership is there so the service will make money.
Then when people see the results, places like So. Cal and Florida will want high speed rail too. But to make it viable, you need to change urban planning for density and ridership to be viable.
BTW, changing zoning density would be a boon to existing property owners because land prices will go up, especially closer to the urban core.
A downtown LA to Vegas line would work. People who fly would just take the train. The train could drop off tourists right by the freeway, behind the Strip.
BTW, Living in the city doesn’t necessarily mean living like sardines. Row houses in the city are nice and roomy.
January 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM #657864briansd1GuestI actually think that Federal money should be spent on high speed rail in the North Eastern Corridor. The ridership is there so the service will make money.
Then when people see the results, places like So. Cal and Florida will want high speed rail too. But to make it viable, you need to change urban planning for density and ridership to be viable.
BTW, changing zoning density would be a boon to existing property owners because land prices will go up, especially closer to the urban core.
A downtown LA to Vegas line would work. People who fly would just take the train. The train could drop off tourists right by the freeway, behind the Strip.
BTW, Living in the city doesn’t necessarily mean living like sardines. Row houses in the city are nice and roomy.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.