- This topic has 50 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 7 months ago by waiting hawk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 3, 2008 at 10:57 AM #12634May 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM #198564PadreBrianParticipant
The courts have ALWAYS sided with the builder. Your contract says that they will sale house at the market price, AND they can change any of the plans at any time.
May 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM #198689PadreBrianParticipantThe courts have ALWAYS sided with the builder. Your contract says that they will sale house at the market price, AND they can change any of the plans at any time.
May 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM #198653PadreBrianParticipantThe courts have ALWAYS sided with the builder. Your contract says that they will sale house at the market price, AND they can change any of the plans at any time.
May 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM #198631PadreBrianParticipantThe courts have ALWAYS sided with the builder. Your contract says that they will sale house at the market price, AND they can change any of the plans at any time.
May 3, 2008 at 12:04 PM #198602PadreBrianParticipantThe courts have ALWAYS sided with the builder. Your contract says that they will sale house at the market price, AND they can change any of the plans at any time.
May 3, 2008 at 12:12 PM #198607Ex-SDParticipantThis is one of those suits where the builder may lose. It could go either way. The plaintiff is suing because the builder is substantially and intentionally changing the value of the homes in the neighborhood by building much smaller & cheaper homes………………….not selling the same home that the plaintiff bought for a cheaper price.
It will be interesting to see who prevails.May 3, 2008 at 12:12 PM #198636Ex-SDParticipantThis is one of those suits where the builder may lose. It could go either way. The plaintiff is suing because the builder is substantially and intentionally changing the value of the homes in the neighborhood by building much smaller & cheaper homes………………….not selling the same home that the plaintiff bought for a cheaper price.
It will be interesting to see who prevails.May 3, 2008 at 12:12 PM #198658Ex-SDParticipantThis is one of those suits where the builder may lose. It could go either way. The plaintiff is suing because the builder is substantially and intentionally changing the value of the homes in the neighborhood by building much smaller & cheaper homes………………….not selling the same home that the plaintiff bought for a cheaper price.
It will be interesting to see who prevails.May 3, 2008 at 12:12 PM #198568Ex-SDParticipantThis is one of those suits where the builder may lose. It could go either way. The plaintiff is suing because the builder is substantially and intentionally changing the value of the homes in the neighborhood by building much smaller & cheaper homes………………….not selling the same home that the plaintiff bought for a cheaper price.
It will be interesting to see who prevails.May 3, 2008 at 12:12 PM #198696Ex-SDParticipantThis is one of those suits where the builder may lose. It could go either way. The plaintiff is suing because the builder is substantially and intentionally changing the value of the homes in the neighborhood by building much smaller & cheaper homes………………….not selling the same home that the plaintiff bought for a cheaper price.
It will be interesting to see who prevails.May 3, 2008 at 5:27 PM #198691ArtyParticipantAs long as the developer doesn’t violate any building code or zoning laws. Court will not do anything. This is an uneducated opinion.
May 3, 2008 at 5:27 PM #198779ArtyParticipantAs long as the developer doesn’t violate any building code or zoning laws. Court will not do anything. This is an uneducated opinion.
May 3, 2008 at 5:27 PM #198727ArtyParticipantAs long as the developer doesn’t violate any building code or zoning laws. Court will not do anything. This is an uneducated opinion.
May 3, 2008 at 5:27 PM #198814ArtyParticipantAs long as the developer doesn’t violate any building code or zoning laws. Court will not do anything. This is an uneducated opinion.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.