- This topic has 570 replies, 53 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 6, 2008 at 12:43 PM #199840May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM #199717LAAFTERHOURSParticipant
4s Renter
Volvo XC driver here. Bought it to lug our 90 lb dog and kids and their stuff around. Wife drives a prius – company car. Id prefer to not drive an SUV but she wanted a safe SUV for our family and it serves its purpose. I wish the MPG was a lot better and if there was a way to reprogam the onboard computer, Id outlay the cash to do it.
May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM #199761LAAFTERHOURSParticipant4s Renter
Volvo XC driver here. Bought it to lug our 90 lb dog and kids and their stuff around. Wife drives a prius – company car. Id prefer to not drive an SUV but she wanted a safe SUV for our family and it serves its purpose. I wish the MPG was a lot better and if there was a way to reprogam the onboard computer, Id outlay the cash to do it.
May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM #199783LAAFTERHOURSParticipant4s Renter
Volvo XC driver here. Bought it to lug our 90 lb dog and kids and their stuff around. Wife drives a prius – company car. Id prefer to not drive an SUV but she wanted a safe SUV for our family and it serves its purpose. I wish the MPG was a lot better and if there was a way to reprogam the onboard computer, Id outlay the cash to do it.
May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM #199811LAAFTERHOURSParticipant4s Renter
Volvo XC driver here. Bought it to lug our 90 lb dog and kids and their stuff around. Wife drives a prius – company car. Id prefer to not drive an SUV but she wanted a safe SUV for our family and it serves its purpose. I wish the MPG was a lot better and if there was a way to reprogam the onboard computer, Id outlay the cash to do it.
May 6, 2008 at 12:56 PM #199845LAAFTERHOURSParticipant4s Renter
Volvo XC driver here. Bought it to lug our 90 lb dog and kids and their stuff around. Wife drives a prius – company car. Id prefer to not drive an SUV but she wanted a safe SUV for our family and it serves its purpose. I wish the MPG was a lot better and if there was a way to reprogam the onboard computer, Id outlay the cash to do it.
May 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #199722SHILOHParticipantCan some of the engineers weigh in on the “water-Power” technology….
This report says the military is going to use it on their Hummers – with a gas/water engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZOsOB3z3IE
It’s …H2O to HHO..?Is the hydrogen safe to use like this?
May 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #199764SHILOHParticipantCan some of the engineers weigh in on the “water-Power” technology….
This report says the military is going to use it on their Hummers – with a gas/water engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZOsOB3z3IE
It’s …H2O to HHO..?Is the hydrogen safe to use like this?
May 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #199788SHILOHParticipantCan some of the engineers weigh in on the “water-Power” technology….
This report says the military is going to use it on their Hummers – with a gas/water engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZOsOB3z3IE
It’s …H2O to HHO..?Is the hydrogen safe to use like this?
May 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #199815SHILOHParticipantCan some of the engineers weigh in on the “water-Power” technology….
This report says the military is going to use it on their Hummers – with a gas/water engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZOsOB3z3IE
It’s …H2O to HHO..?Is the hydrogen safe to use like this?
May 6, 2008 at 1:03 PM #199850SHILOHParticipantCan some of the engineers weigh in on the “water-Power” technology….
This report says the military is going to use it on their Hummers – with a gas/water engine.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZOsOB3z3IE
It’s …H2O to HHO..?Is the hydrogen safe to use like this?
May 6, 2008 at 1:23 PM #199732dharmagirlParticipantWow! Don’t Californians get testy when someone challenges/comments on their car choice. Yowza.
I have no problem, either, with people who own trucks because they need them. There are plenty of people here in Temecula who need to pull horse trailers, boats, or use trucks for farming.
What I take issue with is the big, shiny “status symbol” SUVs. The fancy Escalades and other “blingy” cars. When I’m doing 71 mph on I-15 – and those vehicle angrily pass me and give me a dirty look, I just smirk at them. They either have no clue as to how inefficiently they are driving and/or dont care.
I’m sorry – I dont buy the excuse that you “need” a huge vehicle for kids. It’s a “want” not a “need.” I have friends who have kids and live in Europe. Yes, Europe has better public transport options than SoCA does…but my friends’ kids play soccer, tennis, take cello lessons, etc and they seem to do just FINE without gas guzzling vehicles.
As I said earlier, we’ll see how much people love/need their SUVs when gas is $5.37/gallon.
May 6, 2008 at 1:23 PM #199775dharmagirlParticipantWow! Don’t Californians get testy when someone challenges/comments on their car choice. Yowza.
I have no problem, either, with people who own trucks because they need them. There are plenty of people here in Temecula who need to pull horse trailers, boats, or use trucks for farming.
What I take issue with is the big, shiny “status symbol” SUVs. The fancy Escalades and other “blingy” cars. When I’m doing 71 mph on I-15 – and those vehicle angrily pass me and give me a dirty look, I just smirk at them. They either have no clue as to how inefficiently they are driving and/or dont care.
I’m sorry – I dont buy the excuse that you “need” a huge vehicle for kids. It’s a “want” not a “need.” I have friends who have kids and live in Europe. Yes, Europe has better public transport options than SoCA does…but my friends’ kids play soccer, tennis, take cello lessons, etc and they seem to do just FINE without gas guzzling vehicles.
As I said earlier, we’ll see how much people love/need their SUVs when gas is $5.37/gallon.
May 6, 2008 at 1:23 PM #199797dharmagirlParticipantWow! Don’t Californians get testy when someone challenges/comments on their car choice. Yowza.
I have no problem, either, with people who own trucks because they need them. There are plenty of people here in Temecula who need to pull horse trailers, boats, or use trucks for farming.
What I take issue with is the big, shiny “status symbol” SUVs. The fancy Escalades and other “blingy” cars. When I’m doing 71 mph on I-15 – and those vehicle angrily pass me and give me a dirty look, I just smirk at them. They either have no clue as to how inefficiently they are driving and/or dont care.
I’m sorry – I dont buy the excuse that you “need” a huge vehicle for kids. It’s a “want” not a “need.” I have friends who have kids and live in Europe. Yes, Europe has better public transport options than SoCA does…but my friends’ kids play soccer, tennis, take cello lessons, etc and they seem to do just FINE without gas guzzling vehicles.
As I said earlier, we’ll see how much people love/need their SUVs when gas is $5.37/gallon.
May 6, 2008 at 1:23 PM #199824dharmagirlParticipantWow! Don’t Californians get testy when someone challenges/comments on their car choice. Yowza.
I have no problem, either, with people who own trucks because they need them. There are plenty of people here in Temecula who need to pull horse trailers, boats, or use trucks for farming.
What I take issue with is the big, shiny “status symbol” SUVs. The fancy Escalades and other “blingy” cars. When I’m doing 71 mph on I-15 – and those vehicle angrily pass me and give me a dirty look, I just smirk at them. They either have no clue as to how inefficiently they are driving and/or dont care.
I’m sorry – I dont buy the excuse that you “need” a huge vehicle for kids. It’s a “want” not a “need.” I have friends who have kids and live in Europe. Yes, Europe has better public transport options than SoCA does…but my friends’ kids play soccer, tennis, take cello lessons, etc and they seem to do just FINE without gas guzzling vehicles.
As I said earlier, we’ll see how much people love/need their SUVs when gas is $5.37/gallon.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.