Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › I want to scrreeeammmm
- This topic has 275 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
patientrenter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 16, 2010 at 9:08 PM #567161June 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM #566166
scaredyclassic
Participanti think there’s some sense in which we identify with the scale of the welfare fraud, feel like we could have dne that where the larger fraud is out of our reach. it seems worse because it is closer to home.
June 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM #566264Participanti think there’s some sense in which we identify with the scale of the welfare fraud, feel like we could have dne that where the larger fraud is out of our reach. it seems worse because it is closer to home.
June 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM #566773Participanti think there’s some sense in which we identify with the scale of the welfare fraud, feel like we could have dne that where the larger fraud is out of our reach. it seems worse because it is closer to home.
June 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM #566881Participanti think there’s some sense in which we identify with the scale of the welfare fraud, feel like we could have dne that where the larger fraud is out of our reach. it seems worse because it is closer to home.
June 16, 2010 at 9:27 PM #567166Participanti think there’s some sense in which we identify with the scale of the welfare fraud, feel like we could have dne that where the larger fraud is out of our reach. it seems worse because it is closer to home.
June 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM #566171sdrealtor
ParticipantI would venture that we are outraged even more at these crooks however there is a very small number of people perpetuating fraud on that level. There are hundreds of thousands committing welfare fraud so collectively it is an issue of the same magnitude.
June 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM #566269ParticipantI would venture that we are outraged even more at these crooks however there is a very small number of people perpetuating fraud on that level. There are hundreds of thousands committing welfare fraud so collectively it is an issue of the same magnitude.
June 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM #566778ParticipantI would venture that we are outraged even more at these crooks however there is a very small number of people perpetuating fraud on that level. There are hundreds of thousands committing welfare fraud so collectively it is an issue of the same magnitude.
June 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM #566886ParticipantI would venture that we are outraged even more at these crooks however there is a very small number of people perpetuating fraud on that level. There are hundreds of thousands committing welfare fraud so collectively it is an issue of the same magnitude.
June 16, 2010 at 9:32 PM #567171ParticipantI would venture that we are outraged even more at these crooks however there is a very small number of people perpetuating fraud on that level. There are hundreds of thousands committing welfare fraud so collectively it is an issue of the same magnitude.
June 16, 2010 at 9:39 PM #566176Cube
Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
June 16, 2010 at 9:39 PM #566274Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
June 16, 2010 at 9:39 PM #566783Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
June 16, 2010 at 9:39 PM #566891Participant[quote=Sandi Egan][quote=SD Transplant]If convicted, she faces a maximum term of 19 years in state prison[/quote]
Right. $60K was not enough, so now we are stuck with paying all her bills for another 19 years. That’s the way to amend the state budget.[/quote]Right. And, I’m betting it would be waaaaay cheaper to just keep her on welfare for 19 years than to prosecute and incarcerate her.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.