- This topic has 130 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
TuVu.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM #225641June 19, 2008 at 3:27 PM #225548
sdrealtor
ParticipantSoCal fraudsters are rookies compared with the crooks in South Florida. I’d expect more of these arrests came in South FLA than in So Cal.
June 19, 2008 at 3:27 PM #225654ParticipantSoCal fraudsters are rookies compared with the crooks in South Florida. I’d expect more of these arrests came in South FLA than in So Cal.
June 19, 2008 at 3:27 PM #225670ParticipantSoCal fraudsters are rookies compared with the crooks in South Florida. I’d expect more of these arrests came in South FLA than in So Cal.
June 19, 2008 at 3:27 PM #225701ParticipantSoCal fraudsters are rookies compared with the crooks in South Florida. I’d expect more of these arrests came in South FLA than in So Cal.
June 19, 2008 at 3:27 PM #225717ParticipantSoCal fraudsters are rookies compared with the crooks in South Florida. I’d expect more of these arrests came in South FLA than in So Cal.
June 19, 2008 at 3:29 PM #225553
CoronitaParticipantI wonder if Super J was one of those rounded up. 🙂
June 19, 2008 at 3:29 PM #225659CoronitaParticipantI wonder if Super J was one of those rounded up. 🙂
June 19, 2008 at 3:29 PM #225675CoronitaParticipantI wonder if Super J was one of those rounded up. 🙂
June 19, 2008 at 3:29 PM #225705CoronitaParticipantI wonder if Super J was one of those rounded up. 🙂
June 19, 2008 at 3:29 PM #225721CoronitaParticipantI wonder if Super J was one of those rounded up. 🙂
June 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM #225563CoronitaParticipant[quote] Since the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
[/quote]Interesting. I would think that relative to China (that currently does execute people for things like bribery), we would be moving backwards, wouldn’t we? I know why you’re proposing this…You just want to keep your employment busy… Just kidding….
June 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM #225669CoronitaParticipant[quote] Since the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
[/quote]Interesting. I would think that relative to China (that currently does execute people for things like bribery), we would be moving backwards, wouldn’t we? I know why you’re proposing this…You just want to keep your employment busy… Just kidding….
June 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM #225686CoronitaParticipant[quote] Since the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
[/quote]Interesting. I would think that relative to China (that currently does execute people for things like bribery), we would be moving backwards, wouldn’t we? I know why you’re proposing this…You just want to keep your employment busy… Just kidding….
June 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM #225714CoronitaParticipant[quote] Since the Supreme Court has been considering expanding the death penalty to non-homicide crimes, maybe some new laws providing for execution for financial crimes would motivate people toward fairer dealing at the expense of some potential profit. Obviously not just any old financial crime would qualify–only the most serious financial crimes … if that were the law, and the judge ina trial in which you were serving as a juror told you you had to follow the law, even if you disagreed with it, would you hesitate to impose the death penalty in a financial fraud housing case (assuming you’re open to the death penalty)… or would you just go for it…
[/quote]Interesting. I would think that relative to China (that currently does execute people for things like bribery), we would be moving backwards, wouldn’t we? I know why you’re proposing this…You just want to keep your employment busy… Just kidding….
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
