Menu

Home › Forums › Other › Huckabee is the next Clinton, Bill Clinton

Viewing 35 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • January 3, 2008 at 9:09 PM #11398
      equalizer
      Participant

      Very charasmatic, I feel your pain just like good ole Bill. I’ll claim Nyquil effect if I’m called on it, but he looks like the next President.

    • January 4, 2008 at 8:48 AM #129027
      34f3f3f
      Participant

      He’s the only self-assured candidate in the Republican camp, with the possible exception of Romney. Self-assured, the next Bill Clinton …a Trojan Horse, it worked for Tony Blair.

      • January 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM #129356
        maicde
        Participant

        I’m another “Christian” that doesn’t want to be associated with the Christian right-wing Evangalical group. I’ve been having a hard time confessing I’m a Christian (even though I am) since the right-wingers have hijacked Christianity and truly perverted it, in the full sense of the word. For you Republicans, I feel your pain, even though I’m not a Republican. The Republicans of yesteryear are NOT the Republicans of today Today’s Republicans have unfortunately hooked their star up to the vote of the right-wingers. I am profoundly disturbed by fundamentalism of any kind (Christian, Muslim, etc.) At first I thought that Huckabee didn’t have a chance…now I’m not so sure. God help us…I don’t mean to put down anyone that supports Huckabee. I just don’t feel comfortable with a candidate that is so heavily supported by the right-wing Christian Evangalicals.

        • January 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM #129407
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          Two-Buck Huck

          The rap against Mike Huckabee, the Baptist preacher and ex-Arkansas governor now doing for the Republican Party establishment what three-alarm chili does for an afternoon nap, is that he’s too inexperienced to be president, too naïve — a rube straight out of Dogpatch.
          Few of Huckabee’s critics have actually come out and said what many of them think. The language is coded, as it usually is with class and race in this country. The Wall Street Journal, the anti-tax jihadists at the Club For Growth, the National Review – these pillars of Old School Republicanism have signaled that Huckabee is Not One of Ours. But they’re careful to say it’s not about class, because, of course – it is!
          Class war is forbidden in the Republican playbook. But Huckabee, despite an inept last week of campaigning, has forced the Republican party to face the Wal-Mart shoppers that they have long taken advantage of. He’s here. He’s Gomer. And he’s not going away.
          Huckabee revels in the class war. He’s Two-Buck Huck, and darn proud of it. He likes nothing better than playing the Hick from Hope. He and his wife lived in a trailer for a while, he points out. His son killed a dog one summer, “a mangy dog” at that, as Huckabee explained to the befuddled national press corps. He said he used to eat squirrels, cooking them up in his popcorn popper. Ewwwwhhh!………

          http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/intro/?em&ex=1199595600&en=15c2838ba1928613&ei=5087

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:19 PM #129422
          CMcG
          Participant

          Edwards is my candidate. It’s not that I don’t like Obama or Hillary. I just feel that, in the end, in the privacy of the voting booth, the many Americans who are closeted sexists or racists won’t vote for a black or a woman. Edwards, IMO, is the only Dem who could win against anybody the Repubs put up…except, possibly, Rudy. Rudy would be all right by me, but his star is apparently in a freefall.

          I am so frustrated that these two lightly populated states have such power. One out of 10 people in this country lives in our state. We should have more clout! At least we moved the primary up.

          I find Huckabee frightening. Possibly worse than Bush.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:19 PM #129590
          CMcG
          Participant

          Edwards is my candidate. It’s not that I don’t like Obama or Hillary. I just feel that, in the end, in the privacy of the voting booth, the many Americans who are closeted sexists or racists won’t vote for a black or a woman. Edwards, IMO, is the only Dem who could win against anybody the Repubs put up…except, possibly, Rudy. Rudy would be all right by me, but his star is apparently in a freefall.

          I am so frustrated that these two lightly populated states have such power. One out of 10 people in this country lives in our state. We should have more clout! At least we moved the primary up.

          I find Huckabee frightening. Possibly worse than Bush.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:19 PM #129597
          CMcG
          Participant

          Edwards is my candidate. It’s not that I don’t like Obama or Hillary. I just feel that, in the end, in the privacy of the voting booth, the many Americans who are closeted sexists or racists won’t vote for a black or a woman. Edwards, IMO, is the only Dem who could win against anybody the Repubs put up…except, possibly, Rudy. Rudy would be all right by me, but his star is apparently in a freefall.

          I am so frustrated that these two lightly populated states have such power. One out of 10 people in this country lives in our state. We should have more clout! At least we moved the primary up.

          I find Huckabee frightening. Possibly worse than Bush.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:19 PM #129663
          CMcG
          Participant

          Edwards is my candidate. It’s not that I don’t like Obama or Hillary. I just feel that, in the end, in the privacy of the voting booth, the many Americans who are closeted sexists or racists won’t vote for a black or a woman. Edwards, IMO, is the only Dem who could win against anybody the Repubs put up…except, possibly, Rudy. Rudy would be all right by me, but his star is apparently in a freefall.

          I am so frustrated that these two lightly populated states have such power. One out of 10 people in this country lives in our state. We should have more clout! At least we moved the primary up.

          I find Huckabee frightening. Possibly worse than Bush.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:19 PM #129693
          CMcG
          Participant

          Edwards is my candidate. It’s not that I don’t like Obama or Hillary. I just feel that, in the end, in the privacy of the voting booth, the many Americans who are closeted sexists or racists won’t vote for a black or a woman. Edwards, IMO, is the only Dem who could win against anybody the Repubs put up…except, possibly, Rudy. Rudy would be all right by me, but his star is apparently in a freefall.

          I am so frustrated that these two lightly populated states have such power. One out of 10 people in this country lives in our state. We should have more clout! At least we moved the primary up.

          I find Huckabee frightening. Possibly worse than Bush.

        • January 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM #129575
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          Two-Buck Huck

          The rap against Mike Huckabee, the Baptist preacher and ex-Arkansas governor now doing for the Republican Party establishment what three-alarm chili does for an afternoon nap, is that he’s too inexperienced to be president, too naïve — a rube straight out of Dogpatch.
          Few of Huckabee’s critics have actually come out and said what many of them think. The language is coded, as it usually is with class and race in this country. The Wall Street Journal, the anti-tax jihadists at the Club For Growth, the National Review – these pillars of Old School Republicanism have signaled that Huckabee is Not One of Ours. But they’re careful to say it’s not about class, because, of course – it is!
          Class war is forbidden in the Republican playbook. But Huckabee, despite an inept last week of campaigning, has forced the Republican party to face the Wal-Mart shoppers that they have long taken advantage of. He’s here. He’s Gomer. And he’s not going away.
          Huckabee revels in the class war. He’s Two-Buck Huck, and darn proud of it. He likes nothing better than playing the Hick from Hope. He and his wife lived in a trailer for a while, he points out. His son killed a dog one summer, “a mangy dog” at that, as Huckabee explained to the befuddled national press corps. He said he used to eat squirrels, cooking them up in his popcorn popper. Ewwwwhhh!………

          http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/intro/?em&ex=1199595600&en=15c2838ba1928613&ei=5087

        • January 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM #129582
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          Two-Buck Huck

          The rap against Mike Huckabee, the Baptist preacher and ex-Arkansas governor now doing for the Republican Party establishment what three-alarm chili does for an afternoon nap, is that he’s too inexperienced to be president, too naïve — a rube straight out of Dogpatch.
          Few of Huckabee’s critics have actually come out and said what many of them think. The language is coded, as it usually is with class and race in this country. The Wall Street Journal, the anti-tax jihadists at the Club For Growth, the National Review – these pillars of Old School Republicanism have signaled that Huckabee is Not One of Ours. But they’re careful to say it’s not about class, because, of course – it is!
          Class war is forbidden in the Republican playbook. But Huckabee, despite an inept last week of campaigning, has forced the Republican party to face the Wal-Mart shoppers that they have long taken advantage of. He’s here. He’s Gomer. And he’s not going away.
          Huckabee revels in the class war. He’s Two-Buck Huck, and darn proud of it. He likes nothing better than playing the Hick from Hope. He and his wife lived in a trailer for a while, he points out. His son killed a dog one summer, “a mangy dog” at that, as Huckabee explained to the befuddled national press corps. He said he used to eat squirrels, cooking them up in his popcorn popper. Ewwwwhhh!………

          http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/intro/?em&ex=1199595600&en=15c2838ba1928613&ei=5087

        • January 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM #129648
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          Two-Buck Huck

          The rap against Mike Huckabee, the Baptist preacher and ex-Arkansas governor now doing for the Republican Party establishment what three-alarm chili does for an afternoon nap, is that he’s too inexperienced to be president, too naïve — a rube straight out of Dogpatch.
          Few of Huckabee’s critics have actually come out and said what many of them think. The language is coded, as it usually is with class and race in this country. The Wall Street Journal, the anti-tax jihadists at the Club For Growth, the National Review – these pillars of Old School Republicanism have signaled that Huckabee is Not One of Ours. But they’re careful to say it’s not about class, because, of course – it is!
          Class war is forbidden in the Republican playbook. But Huckabee, despite an inept last week of campaigning, has forced the Republican party to face the Wal-Mart shoppers that they have long taken advantage of. He’s here. He’s Gomer. And he’s not going away.
          Huckabee revels in the class war. He’s Two-Buck Huck, and darn proud of it. He likes nothing better than playing the Hick from Hope. He and his wife lived in a trailer for a while, he points out. His son killed a dog one summer, “a mangy dog” at that, as Huckabee explained to the befuddled national press corps. He said he used to eat squirrels, cooking them up in his popcorn popper. Ewwwwhhh!………

          http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/intro/?em&ex=1199595600&en=15c2838ba1928613&ei=5087

        • January 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM #129679
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          Two-Buck Huck

          The rap against Mike Huckabee, the Baptist preacher and ex-Arkansas governor now doing for the Republican Party establishment what three-alarm chili does for an afternoon nap, is that he’s too inexperienced to be president, too naïve — a rube straight out of Dogpatch.
          Few of Huckabee’s critics have actually come out and said what many of them think. The language is coded, as it usually is with class and race in this country. The Wall Street Journal, the anti-tax jihadists at the Club For Growth, the National Review – these pillars of Old School Republicanism have signaled that Huckabee is Not One of Ours. But they’re careful to say it’s not about class, because, of course – it is!
          Class war is forbidden in the Republican playbook. But Huckabee, despite an inept last week of campaigning, has forced the Republican party to face the Wal-Mart shoppers that they have long taken advantage of. He’s here. He’s Gomer. And he’s not going away.
          Huckabee revels in the class war. He’s Two-Buck Huck, and darn proud of it. He likes nothing better than playing the Hick from Hope. He and his wife lived in a trailer for a while, he points out. His son killed a dog one summer, “a mangy dog” at that, as Huckabee explained to the befuddled national press corps. He said he used to eat squirrels, cooking them up in his popcorn popper. Ewwwwhhh!………

          http://egan.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/intro/?em&ex=1199595600&en=15c2838ba1928613&ei=5087

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:15 PM #129412
          Jumby
          Participant

          I love how so many people refer to other people as Christians or even themselves as a Christian when neither bother to actually follow Jesus…..Jesus said you must “walk” as he did if you want to be a follower….if you ain’t walking then you ain’t one.

          Jesus didn’t bother getting wrapped up in politics. He did believe in giving to the poor, but he asks everybody to do it and not through government taxes.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:15 PM #129580
          Jumby
          Participant

          I love how so many people refer to other people as Christians or even themselves as a Christian when neither bother to actually follow Jesus…..Jesus said you must “walk” as he did if you want to be a follower….if you ain’t walking then you ain’t one.

          Jesus didn’t bother getting wrapped up in politics. He did believe in giving to the poor, but he asks everybody to do it and not through government taxes.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:15 PM #129587
          Jumby
          Participant

          I love how so many people refer to other people as Christians or even themselves as a Christian when neither bother to actually follow Jesus…..Jesus said you must “walk” as he did if you want to be a follower….if you ain’t walking then you ain’t one.

          Jesus didn’t bother getting wrapped up in politics. He did believe in giving to the poor, but he asks everybody to do it and not through government taxes.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:15 PM #129653
          Jumby
          Participant

          I love how so many people refer to other people as Christians or even themselves as a Christian when neither bother to actually follow Jesus…..Jesus said you must “walk” as he did if you want to be a follower….if you ain’t walking then you ain’t one.

          Jesus didn’t bother getting wrapped up in politics. He did believe in giving to the poor, but he asks everybody to do it and not through government taxes.

        • January 4, 2008 at 5:15 PM #129684
          Jumby
          Participant

          I love how so many people refer to other people as Christians or even themselves as a Christian when neither bother to actually follow Jesus…..Jesus said you must “walk” as he did if you want to be a follower….if you ain’t walking then you ain’t one.

          Jesus didn’t bother getting wrapped up in politics. He did believe in giving to the poor, but he asks everybody to do it and not through government taxes.

      • January 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM #129525
        maicde
        Participant

        I’m another “Christian” that doesn’t want to be associated with the Christian right-wing Evangalical group. I’ve been having a hard time confessing I’m a Christian (even though I am) since the right-wingers have hijacked Christianity and truly perverted it, in the full sense of the word. For you Republicans, I feel your pain, even though I’m not a Republican. The Republicans of yesteryear are NOT the Republicans of today Today’s Republicans have unfortunately hooked their star up to the vote of the right-wingers. I am profoundly disturbed by fundamentalism of any kind (Christian, Muslim, etc.) At first I thought that Huckabee didn’t have a chance…now I’m not so sure. God help us…I don’t mean to put down anyone that supports Huckabee. I just don’t feel comfortable with a candidate that is so heavily supported by the right-wing Christian Evangalicals.

      • January 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM #129531
        maicde
        Participant

        I’m another “Christian” that doesn’t want to be associated with the Christian right-wing Evangalical group. I’ve been having a hard time confessing I’m a Christian (even though I am) since the right-wingers have hijacked Christianity and truly perverted it, in the full sense of the word. For you Republicans, I feel your pain, even though I’m not a Republican. The Republicans of yesteryear are NOT the Republicans of today Today’s Republicans have unfortunately hooked their star up to the vote of the right-wingers. I am profoundly disturbed by fundamentalism of any kind (Christian, Muslim, etc.) At first I thought that Huckabee didn’t have a chance…now I’m not so sure. God help us…I don’t mean to put down anyone that supports Huckabee. I just don’t feel comfortable with a candidate that is so heavily supported by the right-wing Christian Evangalicals.

      • January 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM #129598
        maicde
        Participant

        I’m another “Christian” that doesn’t want to be associated with the Christian right-wing Evangalical group. I’ve been having a hard time confessing I’m a Christian (even though I am) since the right-wingers have hijacked Christianity and truly perverted it, in the full sense of the word. For you Republicans, I feel your pain, even though I’m not a Republican. The Republicans of yesteryear are NOT the Republicans of today Today’s Republicans have unfortunately hooked their star up to the vote of the right-wingers. I am profoundly disturbed by fundamentalism of any kind (Christian, Muslim, etc.) At first I thought that Huckabee didn’t have a chance…now I’m not so sure. God help us…I don’t mean to put down anyone that supports Huckabee. I just don’t feel comfortable with a candidate that is so heavily supported by the right-wing Christian Evangalicals.

      • January 4, 2008 at 3:37 PM #129630
        maicde
        Participant

        I’m another “Christian” that doesn’t want to be associated with the Christian right-wing Evangalical group. I’ve been having a hard time confessing I’m a Christian (even though I am) since the right-wingers have hijacked Christianity and truly perverted it, in the full sense of the word. For you Republicans, I feel your pain, even though I’m not a Republican. The Republicans of yesteryear are NOT the Republicans of today Today’s Republicans have unfortunately hooked their star up to the vote of the right-wingers. I am profoundly disturbed by fundamentalism of any kind (Christian, Muslim, etc.) At first I thought that Huckabee didn’t have a chance…now I’m not so sure. God help us…I don’t mean to put down anyone that supports Huckabee. I just don’t feel comfortable with a candidate that is so heavily supported by the right-wing Christian Evangalicals.

    • January 4, 2008 at 8:48 AM #129193
      34f3f3f
      Participant

      He’s the only self-assured candidate in the Republican camp, with the possible exception of Romney. Self-assured, the next Bill Clinton …a Trojan Horse, it worked for Tony Blair.

    • January 4, 2008 at 8:48 AM #129202
      34f3f3f
      Participant

      He’s the only self-assured candidate in the Republican camp, with the possible exception of Romney. Self-assured, the next Bill Clinton …a Trojan Horse, it worked for Tony Blair.

    • January 4, 2008 at 8:48 AM #129269
      34f3f3f
      Participant

      He’s the only self-assured candidate in the Republican camp, with the possible exception of Romney. Self-assured, the next Bill Clinton …a Trojan Horse, it worked for Tony Blair.

    • January 4, 2008 at 8:48 AM #129298
      34f3f3f
      Participant

      He’s the only self-assured candidate in the Republican camp, with the possible exception of Romney. Self-assured, the next Bill Clinton …a Trojan Horse, it worked for Tony Blair.

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM #129071
      bsrsharma
      Participant

      Except the crowds were larger and more enthusiastic at Democrats caucuses in Iowa (according to some Republicans). Obama can easily out-Huckabee Huckabee.

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM #129238
      bsrsharma
      Participant

      Except the crowds were larger and more enthusiastic at Democrats caucuses in Iowa (according to some Republicans). Obama can easily out-Huckabee Huckabee.

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM #129247
      bsrsharma
      Participant

      Except the crowds were larger and more enthusiastic at Democrats caucuses in Iowa (according to some Republicans). Obama can easily out-Huckabee Huckabee.

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM #129314
      bsrsharma
      Participant

      Except the crowds were larger and more enthusiastic at Democrats caucuses in Iowa (according to some Republicans). Obama can easily out-Huckabee Huckabee.

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM #129344
      bsrsharma
      Participant

      Except the crowds were larger and more enthusiastic at Democrats caucuses in Iowa (according to some Republicans). Obama can easily out-Huckabee Huckabee.

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM #129086
      eccen in esc
      Participant

      eccen in esc
      the next “president” has already been “chosen” and all this is just a big game and I’m not playing – or voting

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM #129253
      eccen in esc
      Participant

      eccen in esc
      the next “president” has already been “chosen” and all this is just a big game and I’m not playing – or voting

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM #129262
      eccen in esc
      Participant

      eccen in esc
      the next “president” has already been “chosen” and all this is just a big game and I’m not playing – or voting

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM #129329
      eccen in esc
      Participant

      eccen in esc
      the next “president” has already been “chosen” and all this is just a big game and I’m not playing – or voting

    • January 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM #129359
      eccen in esc
      Participant

      eccen in esc
      the next “president” has already been “chosen” and all this is just a big game and I’m not playing – or voting

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM #129106
      asragov
      Participant

      Huckacide.

      From the National Review:

      http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjJiZDBjZWFiNmFmY2M1NDg2ZjM1Y2YwZjdjNzliMDg=

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM #129275
      asragov
      Participant

      Huckacide.

      From the National Review:

      http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjJiZDBjZWFiNmFmY2M1NDg2ZjM1Y2YwZjdjNzliMDg=

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM #129282
      asragov
      Participant

      Huckacide.

      From the National Review:

      http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjJiZDBjZWFiNmFmY2M1NDg2ZjM1Y2YwZjdjNzliMDg=

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM #129348
      asragov
      Participant

      Huckacide.

      From the National Review:

      http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjJiZDBjZWFiNmFmY2M1NDg2ZjM1Y2YwZjdjNzliMDg=

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:16 AM #129380
      asragov
      Participant

      Huckacide.

      From the National Review:

      http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjJiZDBjZWFiNmFmY2M1NDg2ZjM1Y2YwZjdjNzliMDg=

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM #129132
      alarmclock
      Participant

      I feel compelled to chime in here. I am a Christian, but God help us if we get another bible thumping dumb [email protected] in the whitehouse. I am SO SICK of listening to people choose their candidate based on how the candidate feels about a controversial medical procedure, or the definition of fundamental social units. Might as well just ask a single person how s/he feels about the price of eggs and use that to decide the whole election.

      I think we’ve learned everything we can from the experiment “Let the dumbest guy in the room run things for a few years.” Now lets try the experiment “Let the smartest person in the room run things for a few years”.

      Sellers in Poway, knife catchers? Temecula. 4Closure Ranch.

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM #129300
      alarmclock
      Participant

      I feel compelled to chime in here. I am a Christian, but God help us if we get another bible thumping dumb [email protected] in the whitehouse. I am SO SICK of listening to people choose their candidate based on how the candidate feels about a controversial medical procedure, or the definition of fundamental social units. Might as well just ask a single person how s/he feels about the price of eggs and use that to decide the whole election.

      I think we’ve learned everything we can from the experiment “Let the dumbest guy in the room run things for a few years.” Now lets try the experiment “Let the smartest person in the room run things for a few years”.

      Sellers in Poway, knife catchers? Temecula. 4Closure Ranch.

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM #129307
      alarmclock
      Participant

      I feel compelled to chime in here. I am a Christian, but God help us if we get another bible thumping dumb [email protected] in the whitehouse. I am SO SICK of listening to people choose their candidate based on how the candidate feels about a controversial medical procedure, or the definition of fundamental social units. Might as well just ask a single person how s/he feels about the price of eggs and use that to decide the whole election.

      I think we’ve learned everything we can from the experiment “Let the dumbest guy in the room run things for a few years.” Now lets try the experiment “Let the smartest person in the room run things for a few years”.

      Sellers in Poway, knife catchers? Temecula. 4Closure Ranch.

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM #129373
      alarmclock
      Participant

      I feel compelled to chime in here. I am a Christian, but God help us if we get another bible thumping dumb [email protected] in the whitehouse. I am SO SICK of listening to people choose their candidate based on how the candidate feels about a controversial medical procedure, or the definition of fundamental social units. Might as well just ask a single person how s/he feels about the price of eggs and use that to decide the whole election.

      I think we’ve learned everything we can from the experiment “Let the dumbest guy in the room run things for a few years.” Now lets try the experiment “Let the smartest person in the room run things for a few years”.

      Sellers in Poway, knife catchers? Temecula. 4Closure Ranch.

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:33 AM #129405
      alarmclock
      Participant

      I feel compelled to chime in here. I am a Christian, but God help us if we get another bible thumping dumb [email protected] in the whitehouse. I am SO SICK of listening to people choose their candidate based on how the candidate feels about a controversial medical procedure, or the definition of fundamental social units. Might as well just ask a single person how s/he feels about the price of eggs and use that to decide the whole election.

      I think we’ve learned everything we can from the experiment “Let the dumbest guy in the room run things for a few years.” Now lets try the experiment “Let the smartest person in the room run things for a few years”.

      Sellers in Poway, knife catchers? Temecula. 4Closure Ranch.

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:46 AM #129141
      Eugene
      Participant

      A public supporter of creationism who stands good chance to win presidential elections.

      Only in America…

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM #129161
        Bugs
        Participant

        I can’t wait for this year to be over.

        • January 4, 2008 at 2:42 PM #129311
          LA_Renter
          Participant

          “I can’t wait for this year to be over.”

          Bugs I was literally thinking the same thing right when I read your post.

        • January 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM #129351
          equalizer
          Participant

          Heres a consolation for some of you: druggie Rush and Larry “Tax cuts daily” Kudlow HATE the populist Huckabee for the cardinal sin of raising tax to help poor! I suspect they would vote for Hillary over Huckabee because she is owned by Wall St (The biggest bribes from financial firms go to her) and she coudlnt muster public for real tax increases whereas Huckabee could go on a “what would Jesus do” tour to get public support for tax increases.

          Oh the irony is so delicious.

        • January 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM #129520
          equalizer
          Participant

          Heres a consolation for some of you: druggie Rush and Larry “Tax cuts daily” Kudlow HATE the populist Huckabee for the cardinal sin of raising tax to help poor! I suspect they would vote for Hillary over Huckabee because she is owned by Wall St (The biggest bribes from financial firms go to her) and she coudlnt muster public for real tax increases whereas Huckabee could go on a “what would Jesus do” tour to get public support for tax increases.

          Oh the irony is so delicious.

        • January 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM #129527
          equalizer
          Participant

          Heres a consolation for some of you: druggie Rush and Larry “Tax cuts daily” Kudlow HATE the populist Huckabee for the cardinal sin of raising tax to help poor! I suspect they would vote for Hillary over Huckabee because she is owned by Wall St (The biggest bribes from financial firms go to her) and she coudlnt muster public for real tax increases whereas Huckabee could go on a “what would Jesus do” tour to get public support for tax increases.

          Oh the irony is so delicious.

        • January 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM #129593
          equalizer
          Participant

          Heres a consolation for some of you: druggie Rush and Larry “Tax cuts daily” Kudlow HATE the populist Huckabee for the cardinal sin of raising tax to help poor! I suspect they would vote for Hillary over Huckabee because she is owned by Wall St (The biggest bribes from financial firms go to her) and she coudlnt muster public for real tax increases whereas Huckabee could go on a “what would Jesus do” tour to get public support for tax increases.

          Oh the irony is so delicious.

        • January 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM #129625
          equalizer
          Participant

          Heres a consolation for some of you: druggie Rush and Larry “Tax cuts daily” Kudlow HATE the populist Huckabee for the cardinal sin of raising tax to help poor! I suspect they would vote for Hillary over Huckabee because she is owned by Wall St (The biggest bribes from financial firms go to her) and she coudlnt muster public for real tax increases whereas Huckabee could go on a “what would Jesus do” tour to get public support for tax increases.

          Oh the irony is so delicious.

        • January 4, 2008 at 2:42 PM #129480
          LA_Renter
          Participant

          “I can’t wait for this year to be over.”

          Bugs I was literally thinking the same thing right when I read your post.

        • January 4, 2008 at 2:42 PM #129487
          LA_Renter
          Participant

          “I can’t wait for this year to be over.”

          Bugs I was literally thinking the same thing right when I read your post.

        • January 4, 2008 at 2:42 PM #129553
          LA_Renter
          Participant

          “I can’t wait for this year to be over.”

          Bugs I was literally thinking the same thing right when I read your post.

        • January 4, 2008 at 2:42 PM #129584
          LA_Renter
          Participant

          “I can’t wait for this year to be over.”

          Bugs I was literally thinking the same thing right when I read your post.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM #129330
        Bugs
        Participant

        I can’t wait for this year to be over.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM #129337
        Bugs
        Participant

        I can’t wait for this year to be over.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM #129403
        Bugs
        Participant

        I can’t wait for this year to be over.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:00 AM #129434
        Bugs
        Participant

        I can’t wait for this year to be over.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM #129166
        no_such_reality
        Participant

        I’m a registered repulican and I’ll vote for Obama, Hillary or Edwards before I vote a candidate that is supported by a mobilized base of evangelicals.

        Religious fundamentalism is religious fundamentalism, whether it be Islamic, Jewish or Christian.

        • January 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM #129236
          ocrenter
          Participant

          nsr, we need to start a Republican for Obama group.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM #129251
          Ex-SD
          Participant

          IF……Huckleberry Hound wins the nomination for the Republican Party, there will be an avalanche of registered Republicans crossing over to vote for the Democratic nominee (as long as it’s not Hillary). If it’s Hillary, then there’s a chance that “Mr. fundamentalist” could win. The Democrats need to be smart about this and make Obama their anointed one. There are too many Dems and Repubs who simply will not vote for Hillary.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM #129271
          ocrenter
          Participant

          I shiver as I type this… but I think I would end up casting that Hillary vote if Huckabee wins the nomination. and this is coming from a life time republican.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM #129440
          ocrenter
          Participant

          I shiver as I type this… but I think I would end up casting that Hillary vote if Huckabee wins the nomination. and this is coming from a life time republican.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM #129446
          ocrenter
          Participant

          I shiver as I type this… but I think I would end up casting that Hillary vote if Huckabee wins the nomination. and this is coming from a life time republican.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM #129513
          ocrenter
          Participant

          I shiver as I type this… but I think I would end up casting that Hillary vote if Huckabee wins the nomination. and this is coming from a life time republican.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM #129544
          ocrenter
          Participant

          I shiver as I type this… but I think I would end up casting that Hillary vote if Huckabee wins the nomination. and this is coming from a life time republican.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM #129420
          Ex-SD
          Participant

          IF……Huckleberry Hound wins the nomination for the Republican Party, there will be an avalanche of registered Republicans crossing over to vote for the Democratic nominee (as long as it’s not Hillary). If it’s Hillary, then there’s a chance that “Mr. fundamentalist” could win. The Democrats need to be smart about this and make Obama their anointed one. There are too many Dems and Repubs who simply will not vote for Hillary.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM #129426
          Ex-SD
          Participant

          IF……Huckleberry Hound wins the nomination for the Republican Party, there will be an avalanche of registered Republicans crossing over to vote for the Democratic nominee (as long as it’s not Hillary). If it’s Hillary, then there’s a chance that “Mr. fundamentalist” could win. The Democrats need to be smart about this and make Obama their anointed one. There are too many Dems and Repubs who simply will not vote for Hillary.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM #129493
          Ex-SD
          Participant

          IF……Huckleberry Hound wins the nomination for the Republican Party, there will be an avalanche of registered Republicans crossing over to vote for the Democratic nominee (as long as it’s not Hillary). If it’s Hillary, then there’s a chance that “Mr. fundamentalist” could win. The Democrats need to be smart about this and make Obama their anointed one. There are too many Dems and Repubs who simply will not vote for Hillary.

        • January 4, 2008 at 1:06 PM #129524
          Ex-SD
          Participant

          IF……Huckleberry Hound wins the nomination for the Republican Party, there will be an avalanche of registered Republicans crossing over to vote for the Democratic nominee (as long as it’s not Hillary). If it’s Hillary, then there’s a chance that “Mr. fundamentalist” could win. The Democrats need to be smart about this and make Obama their anointed one. There are too many Dems and Repubs who simply will not vote for Hillary.

        • January 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM #129404
          ocrenter
          Participant

          nsr, we need to start a Republican for Obama group.

        • January 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM #129411
          ocrenter
          Participant

          nsr, we need to start a Republican for Obama group.

        • January 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM #129478
          ocrenter
          Participant

          nsr, we need to start a Republican for Obama group.

        • January 4, 2008 at 12:43 PM #129509
          ocrenter
          Participant

          nsr, we need to start a Republican for Obama group.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM #129335
        no_such_reality
        Participant

        I’m a registered repulican and I’ll vote for Obama, Hillary or Edwards before I vote a candidate that is supported by a mobilized base of evangelicals.

        Religious fundamentalism is religious fundamentalism, whether it be Islamic, Jewish or Christian.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM #129342
        no_such_reality
        Participant

        I’m a registered repulican and I’ll vote for Obama, Hillary or Edwards before I vote a candidate that is supported by a mobilized base of evangelicals.

        Religious fundamentalism is religious fundamentalism, whether it be Islamic, Jewish or Christian.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM #129408
        no_such_reality
        Participant

        I’m a registered repulican and I’ll vote for Obama, Hillary or Edwards before I vote a candidate that is supported by a mobilized base of evangelicals.

        Religious fundamentalism is religious fundamentalism, whether it be Islamic, Jewish or Christian.

      • January 4, 2008 at 11:01 AM #129439
        no_such_reality
        Participant

        I’m a registered repulican and I’ll vote for Obama, Hillary or Edwards before I vote a candidate that is supported by a mobilized base of evangelicals.

        Religious fundamentalism is religious fundamentalism, whether it be Islamic, Jewish or Christian.

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:46 AM #129310
      Eugene
      Participant

      A public supporter of creationism who stands good chance to win presidential elections.

      Only in America…

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:46 AM #129317
      Eugene
      Participant

      A public supporter of creationism who stands good chance to win presidential elections.

      Only in America…

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:46 AM #129383
      Eugene
      Participant

      A public supporter of creationism who stands good chance to win presidential elections.

      Only in America…

    • January 4, 2008 at 10:46 AM #129414
      Eugene
      Participant

      A public supporter of creationism who stands good chance to win presidential elections.

      Only in America…

    • January 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM #129451
      poorgradstudent
      Participant

      Wait, there’s a political thread here, and no one has mentioned Ron Paul yet?

      I agree with the posted National Review article… Huckabee is a dream candidate for the Democrats. I heard a quote that one unaffiliated Republican stratagist suggested that nominating Huckabee would be like nominating Pat Robertson.

      Still, it was bad for Romney to take 2nd in Iowa.

      • January 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM #129541
        equalizer
        Participant

        Ron Paul is the dude for the elite Piggtns.
        Huckabee is no Robertson. Roberston shares views with Grover Norquist and Ralph E. Reed, who should both be in prison along with Jack Abramoff for their Indian gambling coverup felonies. Their main goal is to cut taxes for their rich friends; they only talk to the lower class long enough to get their vote and then they tell them to pick them selves up by the bootstraps while they sip their champagne on their Gulf. V. Huckabee is the complete opposite. We know how this will end: Huckabee will get torn to pieces by the ruling class.

        • February 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM #152982
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          I have a question for all of you with political smarts. I keep hearing Huckabee use the term “miracle” to describe how he may get Republican nomination. I am starting to wonder if it is a code word for “mortality” – as in “McCain is old. He has had cancer, He may die before the general election”.

          So my question is, if McCain is nominated, as seems inevitable, but dies or is incapacitated before general election, will Huckabee be the automatic shoe in? I think this may have happened sometime in history; I am just not aware how it was handled and if the process has been formalized in either party now.

          P.S. Long live McCain; He is an honorable man. My question is just a “Constitutional” curiosity!

        • February 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM #153258
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          I have a question for all of you with political smarts. I keep hearing Huckabee use the term “miracle” to describe how he may get Republican nomination. I am starting to wonder if it is a code word for “mortality” – as in “McCain is old. He has had cancer, He may die before the general election”.

          So my question is, if McCain is nominated, as seems inevitable, but dies or is incapacitated before general election, will Huckabee be the automatic shoe in? I think this may have happened sometime in history; I am just not aware how it was handled and if the process has been formalized in either party now.

          P.S. Long live McCain; He is an honorable man. My question is just a “Constitutional” curiosity!

        • February 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM #153262
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          I have a question for all of you with political smarts. I keep hearing Huckabee use the term “miracle” to describe how he may get Republican nomination. I am starting to wonder if it is a code word for “mortality” – as in “McCain is old. He has had cancer, He may die before the general election”.

          So my question is, if McCain is nominated, as seems inevitable, but dies or is incapacitated before general election, will Huckabee be the automatic shoe in? I think this may have happened sometime in history; I am just not aware how it was handled and if the process has been formalized in either party now.

          P.S. Long live McCain; He is an honorable man. My question is just a “Constitutional” curiosity!

        • February 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM #153283
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          I have a question for all of you with political smarts. I keep hearing Huckabee use the term “miracle” to describe how he may get Republican nomination. I am starting to wonder if it is a code word for “mortality” – as in “McCain is old. He has had cancer, He may die before the general election”.

          So my question is, if McCain is nominated, as seems inevitable, but dies or is incapacitated before general election, will Huckabee be the automatic shoe in? I think this may have happened sometime in history; I am just not aware how it was handled and if the process has been formalized in either party now.

          P.S. Long live McCain; He is an honorable man. My question is just a “Constitutional” curiosity!

        • February 13, 2008 at 11:01 PM #153357
          bsrsharma
          Participant

          I have a question for all of you with political smarts. I keep hearing Huckabee use the term “miracle” to describe how he may get Republican nomination. I am starting to wonder if it is a code word for “mortality” – as in “McCain is old. He has had cancer, He may die before the general election”.

          So my question is, if McCain is nominated, as seems inevitable, but dies or is incapacitated before general election, will Huckabee be the automatic shoe in? I think this may have happened sometime in history; I am just not aware how it was handled and if the process has been formalized in either party now.

          P.S. Long live McCain; He is an honorable man. My question is just a “Constitutional” curiosity!

      • January 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM #129710
        equalizer
        Participant

        Ron Paul is the dude for the elite Piggtns.
        Huckabee is no Robertson. Roberston shares views with Grover Norquist and Ralph E. Reed, who should both be in prison along with Jack Abramoff for their Indian gambling coverup felonies. Their main goal is to cut taxes for their rich friends; they only talk to the lower class long enough to get their vote and then they tell them to pick them selves up by the bootstraps while they sip their champagne on their Gulf. V. Huckabee is the complete opposite. We know how this will end: Huckabee will get torn to pieces by the ruling class.

      • January 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM #129717
        equalizer
        Participant

        Ron Paul is the dude for the elite Piggtns.
        Huckabee is no Robertson. Roberston shares views with Grover Norquist and Ralph E. Reed, who should both be in prison along with Jack Abramoff for their Indian gambling coverup felonies. Their main goal is to cut taxes for their rich friends; they only talk to the lower class long enough to get their vote and then they tell them to pick them selves up by the bootstraps while they sip their champagne on their Gulf. V. Huckabee is the complete opposite. We know how this will end: Huckabee will get torn to pieces by the ruling class.

      • January 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM #129783
        equalizer
        Participant

        Ron Paul is the dude for the elite Piggtns.
        Huckabee is no Robertson. Roberston shares views with Grover Norquist and Ralph E. Reed, who should both be in prison along with Jack Abramoff for their Indian gambling coverup felonies. Their main goal is to cut taxes for their rich friends; they only talk to the lower class long enough to get their vote and then they tell them to pick them selves up by the bootstraps while they sip their champagne on their Gulf. V. Huckabee is the complete opposite. We know how this will end: Huckabee will get torn to pieces by the ruling class.

      • January 4, 2008 at 8:35 PM #129814
        equalizer
        Participant

        Ron Paul is the dude for the elite Piggtns.
        Huckabee is no Robertson. Roberston shares views with Grover Norquist and Ralph E. Reed, who should both be in prison along with Jack Abramoff for their Indian gambling coverup felonies. Their main goal is to cut taxes for their rich friends; they only talk to the lower class long enough to get their vote and then they tell them to pick them selves up by the bootstraps while they sip their champagne on their Gulf. V. Huckabee is the complete opposite. We know how this will end: Huckabee will get torn to pieces by the ruling class.

    • January 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM #129620
      poorgradstudent
      Participant

      Wait, there’s a political thread here, and no one has mentioned Ron Paul yet?

      I agree with the posted National Review article… Huckabee is a dream candidate for the Democrats. I heard a quote that one unaffiliated Republican stratagist suggested that nominating Huckabee would be like nominating Pat Robertson.

      Still, it was bad for Romney to take 2nd in Iowa.

    • January 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM #129627
      poorgradstudent
      Participant

      Wait, there’s a political thread here, and no one has mentioned Ron Paul yet?

      I agree with the posted National Review article… Huckabee is a dream candidate for the Democrats. I heard a quote that one unaffiliated Republican stratagist suggested that nominating Huckabee would be like nominating Pat Robertson.

      Still, it was bad for Romney to take 2nd in Iowa.

    • January 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM #129694
      poorgradstudent
      Participant

      Wait, there’s a political thread here, and no one has mentioned Ron Paul yet?

      I agree with the posted National Review article… Huckabee is a dream candidate for the Democrats. I heard a quote that one unaffiliated Republican stratagist suggested that nominating Huckabee would be like nominating Pat Robertson.

      Still, it was bad for Romney to take 2nd in Iowa.

    • January 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM #129724
      poorgradstudent
      Participant

      Wait, there’s a political thread here, and no one has mentioned Ron Paul yet?

      I agree with the posted National Review article… Huckabee is a dream candidate for the Democrats. I heard a quote that one unaffiliated Republican stratagist suggested that nominating Huckabee would be like nominating Pat Robertson.

      Still, it was bad for Romney to take 2nd in Iowa.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 35 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.