- This topic has 835 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 9, 2010 at 2:47 PM #603950September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #602934
njtosd
ParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603023njtosd
ParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603571njtosd
ParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603678njtosd
ParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM #603995njtosd
ParticipantI guess what I’m trying to get at is statistical significance. If no person (realtor or not) can predict the sales price of a home (on average) with a greater than 96% accuracy, it’s meaningless (statistically) to say that someone paid a few percent too much or too little. For the same reason, it would be ridiculous to say that someone is probably wrong when they guess “heads” on the flip of a coin.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #602959sdrealtor
ParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #603048sdrealtor
ParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #603596sdrealtor
ParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #603703sdrealtor
ParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:28 PM #604020sdrealtor
ParticipantDoesnt work that way. Someone can predict with very high accuracy but the unexpected can occasionally happen. Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #602969njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #603058njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #603606njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
September 9, 2010 at 3:36 PM #603713njtosd
Participant[quote=sdrealtor] . . . Even though you cant predict something perfectly you can make an assessment on the outcome post mortum.[/quote]
But that’s why they came up with the phrases Monday morning quarterback, 2-/20 hindsight, etc. You can make an assessment, but you have to keep in mind the concept of statistical significance. Everyone is entitled to their own (subjective) opinion. But to say that someone else got it wrong (objectively) you need to know how accurately the best estimator can predict.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.