- This topic has 835 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 9 months ago by
sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 3, 2010 at 10:39 AM #601050September 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM #600003
all
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]
You are assuming the buyer’s agent even knows about aimloan.com. [/quote]
Well, if I know about aimloan.com and similar and the buyer’s agent does not then maybe the agent is not worth the money and should instead find less intellectually challenging occupation πSeptember 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM #600094all
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]
You are assuming the buyer’s agent even knows about aimloan.com. [/quote]
Well, if I know about aimloan.com and similar and the buyer’s agent does not then maybe the agent is not worth the money and should instead find less intellectually challenging occupation πSeptember 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM #600640all
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]
You are assuming the buyer’s agent even knows about aimloan.com. [/quote]
Well, if I know about aimloan.com and similar and the buyer’s agent does not then maybe the agent is not worth the money and should instead find less intellectually challenging occupation πSeptember 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM #600747all
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]
You are assuming the buyer’s agent even knows about aimloan.com. [/quote]
Well, if I know about aimloan.com and similar and the buyer’s agent does not then maybe the agent is not worth the money and should instead find less intellectually challenging occupation πSeptember 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM #601065all
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]
You are assuming the buyer’s agent even knows about aimloan.com. [/quote]
Well, if I know about aimloan.com and similar and the buyer’s agent does not then maybe the agent is not worth the money and should instead find less intellectually challenging occupation πSeptember 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #600013all
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
captcha, that is the purpose of agents/brokers carrying E & O insurance. It is required on every brokered transaction, on each side. If you, as a seller or buyer, later sue your broker for damages inflicted upon you due to your agent’s neglect, lack of oversight and/or incompetency, for instance, their E & O policy will pay to defend the suit and/or pay your award, along with any culpable brokers, if you prevail in court.
[/quote]All you need to do is pay an attorney to litigate and win after you sign a release of liability put together by association of realtors.
[quote=bearishgurl]
If you represent yourself, you have no one to blame but yourself.
[/quote]Well, you can go with the listing agent and get the same legal protection, no?
[quote=bearishgurl]
If your buyer’s agent INSISTS you use his “buddy mortgage broker,” this is a violation of RESPA and they can be disciplined by the DRE if a complaint is filed and it is later determined that your agent took any kind of “kickback” from the successful origination of your mortgage loan after sending you to a particular mortgage broker, banker or direct lender.captcha, you are always free, as a buyer, to use whichever lender you desire, even in purchasing new construction. It is legal to offer incentives to entice a buyer to use a certain lender but it is NOT legal to force them to use a certain lender or reject an already-accepted offer because the buyer will not use a certain lender. The buyer always has the final say in which lender they will use.[/quote]
I know that. That info might have been valuable and differentiating factor years ago, but today everyone with Internet access can learn that while taking a piss.
September 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #600104all
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
captcha, that is the purpose of agents/brokers carrying E & O insurance. It is required on every brokered transaction, on each side. If you, as a seller or buyer, later sue your broker for damages inflicted upon you due to your agent’s neglect, lack of oversight and/or incompetency, for instance, their E & O policy will pay to defend the suit and/or pay your award, along with any culpable brokers, if you prevail in court.
[/quote]All you need to do is pay an attorney to litigate and win after you sign a release of liability put together by association of realtors.
[quote=bearishgurl]
If you represent yourself, you have no one to blame but yourself.
[/quote]Well, you can go with the listing agent and get the same legal protection, no?
[quote=bearishgurl]
If your buyer’s agent INSISTS you use his “buddy mortgage broker,” this is a violation of RESPA and they can be disciplined by the DRE if a complaint is filed and it is later determined that your agent took any kind of “kickback” from the successful origination of your mortgage loan after sending you to a particular mortgage broker, banker or direct lender.captcha, you are always free, as a buyer, to use whichever lender you desire, even in purchasing new construction. It is legal to offer incentives to entice a buyer to use a certain lender but it is NOT legal to force them to use a certain lender or reject an already-accepted offer because the buyer will not use a certain lender. The buyer always has the final say in which lender they will use.[/quote]
I know that. That info might have been valuable and differentiating factor years ago, but today everyone with Internet access can learn that while taking a piss.
September 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #600651all
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
captcha, that is the purpose of agents/brokers carrying E & O insurance. It is required on every brokered transaction, on each side. If you, as a seller or buyer, later sue your broker for damages inflicted upon you due to your agent’s neglect, lack of oversight and/or incompetency, for instance, their E & O policy will pay to defend the suit and/or pay your award, along with any culpable brokers, if you prevail in court.
[/quote]All you need to do is pay an attorney to litigate and win after you sign a release of liability put together by association of realtors.
[quote=bearishgurl]
If you represent yourself, you have no one to blame but yourself.
[/quote]Well, you can go with the listing agent and get the same legal protection, no?
[quote=bearishgurl]
If your buyer’s agent INSISTS you use his “buddy mortgage broker,” this is a violation of RESPA and they can be disciplined by the DRE if a complaint is filed and it is later determined that your agent took any kind of “kickback” from the successful origination of your mortgage loan after sending you to a particular mortgage broker, banker or direct lender.captcha, you are always free, as a buyer, to use whichever lender you desire, even in purchasing new construction. It is legal to offer incentives to entice a buyer to use a certain lender but it is NOT legal to force them to use a certain lender or reject an already-accepted offer because the buyer will not use a certain lender. The buyer always has the final say in which lender they will use.[/quote]
I know that. That info might have been valuable and differentiating factor years ago, but today everyone with Internet access can learn that while taking a piss.
September 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #600757all
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
captcha, that is the purpose of agents/brokers carrying E & O insurance. It is required on every brokered transaction, on each side. If you, as a seller or buyer, later sue your broker for damages inflicted upon you due to your agent’s neglect, lack of oversight and/or incompetency, for instance, their E & O policy will pay to defend the suit and/or pay your award, along with any culpable brokers, if you prevail in court.
[/quote]All you need to do is pay an attorney to litigate and win after you sign a release of liability put together by association of realtors.
[quote=bearishgurl]
If you represent yourself, you have no one to blame but yourself.
[/quote]Well, you can go with the listing agent and get the same legal protection, no?
[quote=bearishgurl]
If your buyer’s agent INSISTS you use his “buddy mortgage broker,” this is a violation of RESPA and they can be disciplined by the DRE if a complaint is filed and it is later determined that your agent took any kind of “kickback” from the successful origination of your mortgage loan after sending you to a particular mortgage broker, banker or direct lender.captcha, you are always free, as a buyer, to use whichever lender you desire, even in purchasing new construction. It is legal to offer incentives to entice a buyer to use a certain lender but it is NOT legal to force them to use a certain lender or reject an already-accepted offer because the buyer will not use a certain lender. The buyer always has the final say in which lender they will use.[/quote]
I know that. That info might have been valuable and differentiating factor years ago, but today everyone with Internet access can learn that while taking a piss.
September 3, 2010 at 10:52 AM #601075all
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
captcha, that is the purpose of agents/brokers carrying E & O insurance. It is required on every brokered transaction, on each side. If you, as a seller or buyer, later sue your broker for damages inflicted upon you due to your agent’s neglect, lack of oversight and/or incompetency, for instance, their E & O policy will pay to defend the suit and/or pay your award, along with any culpable brokers, if you prevail in court.
[/quote]All you need to do is pay an attorney to litigate and win after you sign a release of liability put together by association of realtors.
[quote=bearishgurl]
If you represent yourself, you have no one to blame but yourself.
[/quote]Well, you can go with the listing agent and get the same legal protection, no?
[quote=bearishgurl]
If your buyer’s agent INSISTS you use his “buddy mortgage broker,” this is a violation of RESPA and they can be disciplined by the DRE if a complaint is filed and it is later determined that your agent took any kind of “kickback” from the successful origination of your mortgage loan after sending you to a particular mortgage broker, banker or direct lender.captcha, you are always free, as a buyer, to use whichever lender you desire, even in purchasing new construction. It is legal to offer incentives to entice a buyer to use a certain lender but it is NOT legal to force them to use a certain lender or reject an already-accepted offer because the buyer will not use a certain lender. The buyer always has the final say in which lender they will use.[/quote]
I know that. That info might have been valuable and differentiating factor years ago, but today everyone with Internet access can learn that while taking a piss.
September 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM #600048matt-waiting
Participantcaptcha hit the nail on the head.
If I can negotiate a 2% rebate from the seller’s agent, look at a home inspection report, do my own comps, negotiate my own loan, and talk to an attorney for an hour, I don’t see the downside.
I also find it troubling that when asked to justify the value of a buyer’s agent, all I get in return is vague threats of “the risks are too great.” Seems like a scare tactic to me.
On the other hand, maybe captcha and I are wrong and there are dozens of examples of a buyer getting screwed because he went with the seller’s agent. If we are, I would think there would be lots of stories of how a buyer’s agent saved the buyer money (that they would have lost if they weren’t there. Sorry, I would have asked to have the furnace fixed.)
September 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM #600139matt-waiting
Participantcaptcha hit the nail on the head.
If I can negotiate a 2% rebate from the seller’s agent, look at a home inspection report, do my own comps, negotiate my own loan, and talk to an attorney for an hour, I don’t see the downside.
I also find it troubling that when asked to justify the value of a buyer’s agent, all I get in return is vague threats of “the risks are too great.” Seems like a scare tactic to me.
On the other hand, maybe captcha and I are wrong and there are dozens of examples of a buyer getting screwed because he went with the seller’s agent. If we are, I would think there would be lots of stories of how a buyer’s agent saved the buyer money (that they would have lost if they weren’t there. Sorry, I would have asked to have the furnace fixed.)
September 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM #600686matt-waiting
Participantcaptcha hit the nail on the head.
If I can negotiate a 2% rebate from the seller’s agent, look at a home inspection report, do my own comps, negotiate my own loan, and talk to an attorney for an hour, I don’t see the downside.
I also find it troubling that when asked to justify the value of a buyer’s agent, all I get in return is vague threats of “the risks are too great.” Seems like a scare tactic to me.
On the other hand, maybe captcha and I are wrong and there are dozens of examples of a buyer getting screwed because he went with the seller’s agent. If we are, I would think there would be lots of stories of how a buyer’s agent saved the buyer money (that they would have lost if they weren’t there. Sorry, I would have asked to have the furnace fixed.)
September 3, 2010 at 12:31 PM #600792matt-waiting
Participantcaptcha hit the nail on the head.
If I can negotiate a 2% rebate from the seller’s agent, look at a home inspection report, do my own comps, negotiate my own loan, and talk to an attorney for an hour, I don’t see the downside.
I also find it troubling that when asked to justify the value of a buyer’s agent, all I get in return is vague threats of “the risks are too great.” Seems like a scare tactic to me.
On the other hand, maybe captcha and I are wrong and there are dozens of examples of a buyer getting screwed because he went with the seller’s agent. If we are, I would think there would be lots of stories of how a buyer’s agent saved the buyer money (that they would have lost if they weren’t there. Sorry, I would have asked to have the furnace fixed.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.