- This topic has 60 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by
(former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 8, 2009 at 12:42 PM #14788January 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM #326010
(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThe San Diego real estate cycle has been ahead of the LA cycle for the past several years. The peak happened almost a year later in LA and the decline started in SD well ahead of LA. Shouldn’t SD have already been seeing these declines ?
Maybe SD has experienced this already and perhaps I missed or have forgotten about it.
January 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM #326524(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThe San Diego real estate cycle has been ahead of the LA cycle for the past several years. The peak happened almost a year later in LA and the decline started in SD well ahead of LA. Shouldn’t SD have already been seeing these declines ?
Maybe SD has experienced this already and perhaps I missed or have forgotten about it.
January 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM #326440(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThe San Diego real estate cycle has been ahead of the LA cycle for the past several years. The peak happened almost a year later in LA and the decline started in SD well ahead of LA. Shouldn’t SD have already been seeing these declines ?
Maybe SD has experienced this already and perhaps I missed or have forgotten about it.
January 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM #326421(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThe San Diego real estate cycle has been ahead of the LA cycle for the past several years. The peak happened almost a year later in LA and the decline started in SD well ahead of LA. Shouldn’t SD have already been seeing these declines ?
Maybe SD has experienced this already and perhaps I missed or have forgotten about it.
January 8, 2009 at 1:30 PM #326353(former)FormerSanDiegan
ParticipantThe San Diego real estate cycle has been ahead of the LA cycle for the past several years. The peak happened almost a year later in LA and the decline started in SD well ahead of LA. Shouldn’t SD have already been seeing these declines ?
Maybe SD has experienced this already and perhaps I missed or have forgotten about it.
January 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM #326450Diego Mamani
ParticipantVery interesting. Hopefully a reporter will investigate the rents’ trend in apartments vs. condos vs. SFHs, which I believe are different beasts.
Many Piggingtonians are biting the bullet and searching for a house to buy based on a favorable (or nearly neutral/favorable) rent vs. buy calculation. However, as the recession and deflationary environment get worse in 2009-2010, watch our for declining rents.
You may still find out that you grossly overpaid for a house if rents continue to drop substantially.
January 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM #326363Diego Mamani
ParticipantVery interesting. Hopefully a reporter will investigate the rents’ trend in apartments vs. condos vs. SFHs, which I believe are different beasts.
Many Piggingtonians are biting the bullet and searching for a house to buy based on a favorable (or nearly neutral/favorable) rent vs. buy calculation. However, as the recession and deflationary environment get worse in 2009-2010, watch our for declining rents.
You may still find out that you grossly overpaid for a house if rents continue to drop substantially.
January 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM #326020Diego Mamani
ParticipantVery interesting. Hopefully a reporter will investigate the rents’ trend in apartments vs. condos vs. SFHs, which I believe are different beasts.
Many Piggingtonians are biting the bullet and searching for a house to buy based on a favorable (or nearly neutral/favorable) rent vs. buy calculation. However, as the recession and deflationary environment get worse in 2009-2010, watch our for declining rents.
You may still find out that you grossly overpaid for a house if rents continue to drop substantially.
January 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM #326534Diego Mamani
ParticipantVery interesting. Hopefully a reporter will investigate the rents’ trend in apartments vs. condos vs. SFHs, which I believe are different beasts.
Many Piggingtonians are biting the bullet and searching for a house to buy based on a favorable (or nearly neutral/favorable) rent vs. buy calculation. However, as the recession and deflationary environment get worse in 2009-2010, watch our for declining rents.
You may still find out that you grossly overpaid for a house if rents continue to drop substantially.
January 8, 2009 at 1:44 PM #326431Diego Mamani
ParticipantVery interesting. Hopefully a reporter will investigate the rents’ trend in apartments vs. condos vs. SFHs, which I believe are different beasts.
Many Piggingtonians are biting the bullet and searching for a house to buy based on a favorable (or nearly neutral/favorable) rent vs. buy calculation. However, as the recession and deflationary environment get worse in 2009-2010, watch our for declining rents.
You may still find out that you grossly overpaid for a house if rents continue to drop substantially.
January 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM #326544cr
ParticipantAll the more reason for home prices to continue falling for several more years.
January 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM #326460cr
ParticipantAll the more reason for home prices to continue falling for several more years.
January 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM #326441cr
ParticipantAll the more reason for home prices to continue falling for several more years.
January 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM #326030cr
ParticipantAll the more reason for home prices to continue falling for several more years.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.