Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Homebuyer tax credit bill passes Senate

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 5, 2009 at 7:59 AM #478448
    freshman
    Participant

    [quote=pemeliza]I don’t think the bill is retro-active. It sucks for me also because I bought in October and would have qualified for the $6500 move-up credit. Oh well, you can’t predict the government![/quote]

    You may not qualify $6500 either, because the bill would start on Dec 1.

    http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2009/10/29/qa-the-home-buyer-tax-credit-extension/

    November 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM #478753
    freshman
    Participant

    If the bill passes, it may be good for existing home owner to buy cheap rental property .

    November 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM #478533
    freshman
    Participant

    If the bill passes, it may be good for existing home owner to buy cheap rental property .

    November 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM #478085
    freshman
    Participant

    If the bill passes, it may be good for existing home owner to buy cheap rental property .

    November 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM #478453
    freshman
    Participant

    If the bill passes, it may be good for existing home owner to buy cheap rental property .

    November 5, 2009 at 8:02 AM #477914
    freshman
    Participant

    If the bill passes, it may be good for existing home owner to buy cheap rental property .

    November 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM #478100
    Arraya
    Participant

    Getting a few thousand dollars for a home that is overvalued way beyond that amount is not a good deal.

    It’s a state-sponsored ponzi-scheme funneling money to wall street.

    Meanwhile they working feverishly to block unemployment benefits extensions.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM #478468
    Arraya
    Participant

    Getting a few thousand dollars for a home that is overvalued way beyond that amount is not a good deal.

    It’s a state-sponsored ponzi-scheme funneling money to wall street.

    Meanwhile they working feverishly to block unemployment benefits extensions.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM #477928
    Arraya
    Participant

    Getting a few thousand dollars for a home that is overvalued way beyond that amount is not a good deal.

    It’s a state-sponsored ponzi-scheme funneling money to wall street.

    Meanwhile they working feverishly to block unemployment benefits extensions.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM #478768
    Arraya
    Participant

    Getting a few thousand dollars for a home that is overvalued way beyond that amount is not a good deal.

    It’s a state-sponsored ponzi-scheme funneling money to wall street.

    Meanwhile they working feverishly to block unemployment benefits extensions.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM #478548
    Arraya
    Participant

    Getting a few thousand dollars for a home that is overvalued way beyond that amount is not a good deal.

    It’s a state-sponsored ponzi-scheme funneling money to wall street.

    Meanwhile they working feverishly to block unemployment benefits extensions.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 AM #478773
    pemeliza
    Participant

    Thanks for the link freshman … I didn’t think the bill was retro-active and that confirmed it.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 AM #478553
    pemeliza
    Participant

    Thanks for the link freshman … I didn’t think the bill was retro-active and that confirmed it.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 AM #478473
    pemeliza
    Participant

    Thanks for the link freshman … I didn’t think the bill was retro-active and that confirmed it.

    November 5, 2009 at 8:28 AM #477933
    pemeliza
    Participant

    Thanks for the link freshman … I didn’t think the bill was retro-active and that confirmed it.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 81 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.