- This topic has 10 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
Portlock.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 12, 2008 at 9:04 AM #12078March 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM #168014
farbet
ParticipantSorry about the order. view from bottom up
March 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM #168341farbet
ParticipantSorry about the order. view from bottom up
March 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM #168347farbet
ParticipantSorry about the order. view from bottom up
March 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM #168374farbet
ParticipantSorry about the order. view from bottom up
March 12, 2008 at 9:53 AM #168445farbet
ParticipantSorry about the order. view from bottom up
March 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM #168024Portlock
ParticipantTo me, it says
1. Mello-Roos are required to pay for the bonds, which funded the infrastructure of SEH.
2. If we reduce the amount of Mello-Roos charged to each household, we can’t make the scheduled payments to bond holders
3. The Committee already reduced the Mello-Roos tax by refinancing the bond contract twice (2004, 2007)So in essence:
1. Here’s why we charge so much for Mello Roos
2. Homeowners will continue to pay Mello Roos to pay off the debt created to build SEH
3. No, the committee will not be reducing the amount anytime soon.
4. Thanks for asking, though.March 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM #168351Portlock
ParticipantTo me, it says
1. Mello-Roos are required to pay for the bonds, which funded the infrastructure of SEH.
2. If we reduce the amount of Mello-Roos charged to each household, we can’t make the scheduled payments to bond holders
3. The Committee already reduced the Mello-Roos tax by refinancing the bond contract twice (2004, 2007)So in essence:
1. Here’s why we charge so much for Mello Roos
2. Homeowners will continue to pay Mello Roos to pay off the debt created to build SEH
3. No, the committee will not be reducing the amount anytime soon.
4. Thanks for asking, though.March 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM #168357Portlock
ParticipantTo me, it says
1. Mello-Roos are required to pay for the bonds, which funded the infrastructure of SEH.
2. If we reduce the amount of Mello-Roos charged to each household, we can’t make the scheduled payments to bond holders
3. The Committee already reduced the Mello-Roos tax by refinancing the bond contract twice (2004, 2007)So in essence:
1. Here’s why we charge so much for Mello Roos
2. Homeowners will continue to pay Mello Roos to pay off the debt created to build SEH
3. No, the committee will not be reducing the amount anytime soon.
4. Thanks for asking, though.March 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM #168384Portlock
ParticipantTo me, it says
1. Mello-Roos are required to pay for the bonds, which funded the infrastructure of SEH.
2. If we reduce the amount of Mello-Roos charged to each household, we can’t make the scheduled payments to bond holders
3. The Committee already reduced the Mello-Roos tax by refinancing the bond contract twice (2004, 2007)So in essence:
1. Here’s why we charge so much for Mello Roos
2. Homeowners will continue to pay Mello Roos to pay off the debt created to build SEH
3. No, the committee will not be reducing the amount anytime soon.
4. Thanks for asking, though.March 12, 2008 at 10:34 AM #168455Portlock
ParticipantTo me, it says
1. Mello-Roos are required to pay for the bonds, which funded the infrastructure of SEH.
2. If we reduce the amount of Mello-Roos charged to each household, we can’t make the scheduled payments to bond holders
3. The Committee already reduced the Mello-Roos tax by refinancing the bond contract twice (2004, 2007)So in essence:
1. Here’s why we charge so much for Mello Roos
2. Homeowners will continue to pay Mello Roos to pay off the debt created to build SEH
3. No, the committee will not be reducing the amount anytime soon.
4. Thanks for asking, though. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.