- This topic has 70 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by patb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 6, 2010 at 4:24 PM #613521October 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM #614444AecetiaParticipant
But there is the issue of going into unsecured private property especially after evacuations have been ordered, so background checks are essential.
October 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM #614560AecetiaParticipantBut there is the issue of going into unsecured private property especially after evacuations have been ordered, so background checks are essential.
October 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM #614866AecetiaParticipantBut there is the issue of going into unsecured private property especially after evacuations have been ordered, so background checks are essential.
October 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM #613901AecetiaParticipantBut there is the issue of going into unsecured private property especially after evacuations have been ordered, so background checks are essential.
October 6, 2010 at 10:32 PM #613815AecetiaParticipantBut there is the issue of going into unsecured private property especially after evacuations have been ordered, so background checks are essential.
October 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM #613946enron_by_the_seaParticipantAll this has been studied by Homer Simpson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crook_and_LadderOctober 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM #614490enron_by_the_seaParticipantAll this has been studied by Homer Simpson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crook_and_LadderOctober 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM #614911enron_by_the_seaParticipantAll this has been studied by Homer Simpson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crook_and_LadderOctober 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM #613860enron_by_the_seaParticipantAll this has been studied by Homer Simpson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crook_and_LadderOctober 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM #614605enron_by_the_seaParticipantAll this has been studied by Homer Simpson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crook_and_LadderOctober 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM #614156sdduuuudeParticipantThe question I have is – why isn’t there the $20,000 “real time” option ?
I mean, if the guy didn’t pay his $75, punish him by charging him for the service but don’t let his house burn. That is the lose-lose option.
Go for the win-win option. He wants his house saved and is willing to pay. The firefighters want to save his house and fund the department.
Interesting to see if insurance will cover it.
October 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM #614074sdduuuudeParticipantThe question I have is – why isn’t there the $20,000 “real time” option ?
I mean, if the guy didn’t pay his $75, punish him by charging him for the service but don’t let his house burn. That is the lose-lose option.
Go for the win-win option. He wants his house saved and is willing to pay. The firefighters want to save his house and fund the department.
Interesting to see if insurance will cover it.
October 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM #615125sdduuuudeParticipantThe question I have is – why isn’t there the $20,000 “real time” option ?
I mean, if the guy didn’t pay his $75, punish him by charging him for the service but don’t let his house burn. That is the lose-lose option.
Go for the win-win option. He wants his house saved and is willing to pay. The firefighters want to save his house and fund the department.
Interesting to see if insurance will cover it.
October 7, 2010 at 9:26 AM #614818sdduuuudeParticipantThe question I have is – why isn’t there the $20,000 “real time” option ?
I mean, if the guy didn’t pay his $75, punish him by charging him for the service but don’t let his house burn. That is the lose-lose option.
Go for the win-win option. He wants his house saved and is willing to pay. The firefighters want to save his house and fund the department.
Interesting to see if insurance will cover it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.