- This topic has 295 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 8, 2008 at 3:48 PM #183151April 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM #183093little ladyParticipant
I don’t believe all these people feel they are NOT being logical. They know they are buying in a buyers market. They are paying rent. If they come from an area in San Diego where their rent is in the 2k range, they are still close to the payment on this house, and they NOW have a tax write off.
I too am an independant thinker. I question EVERY one even myself.
I needed to hear a good argument on why I am wrong in being worried about my “lowball” offer not being accepted and that maybe I misjudged. I thought maybe other areas, all the “better ones” are still correcting but maybe some are done. I needed to hear that I am wrong for that
April 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM #183104little ladyParticipantI don’t believe all these people feel they are NOT being logical. They know they are buying in a buyers market. They are paying rent. If they come from an area in San Diego where their rent is in the 2k range, they are still close to the payment on this house, and they NOW have a tax write off.
I too am an independant thinker. I question EVERY one even myself.
I needed to hear a good argument on why I am wrong in being worried about my “lowball” offer not being accepted and that maybe I misjudged. I thought maybe other areas, all the “better ones” are still correcting but maybe some are done. I needed to hear that I am wrong for that
April 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM #183133little ladyParticipantI don’t believe all these people feel they are NOT being logical. They know they are buying in a buyers market. They are paying rent. If they come from an area in San Diego where their rent is in the 2k range, they are still close to the payment on this house, and they NOW have a tax write off.
I too am an independant thinker. I question EVERY one even myself.
I needed to hear a good argument on why I am wrong in being worried about my “lowball” offer not being accepted and that maybe I misjudged. I thought maybe other areas, all the “better ones” are still correcting but maybe some are done. I needed to hear that I am wrong for that
April 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM #183139little ladyParticipantI don’t believe all these people feel they are NOT being logical. They know they are buying in a buyers market. They are paying rent. If they come from an area in San Diego where their rent is in the 2k range, they are still close to the payment on this house, and they NOW have a tax write off.
I too am an independant thinker. I question EVERY one even myself.
I needed to hear a good argument on why I am wrong in being worried about my “lowball” offer not being accepted and that maybe I misjudged. I thought maybe other areas, all the “better ones” are still correcting but maybe some are done. I needed to hear that I am wrong for that
April 8, 2008 at 3:51 PM #183145little ladyParticipantI don’t believe all these people feel they are NOT being logical. They know they are buying in a buyers market. They are paying rent. If they come from an area in San Diego where their rent is in the 2k range, they are still close to the payment on this house, and they NOW have a tax write off.
I too am an independant thinker. I question EVERY one even myself.
I needed to hear a good argument on why I am wrong in being worried about my “lowball” offer not being accepted and that maybe I misjudged. I thought maybe other areas, all the “better ones” are still correcting but maybe some are done. I needed to hear that I am wrong for that
April 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM #183112DWCAPParticipantyour wrong.
April 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM #183126DWCAPParticipantyour wrong.
April 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM #183153DWCAPParticipantyour wrong.
April 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM #183160DWCAPParticipantyour wrong.
April 8, 2008 at 3:56 PM #183165DWCAPParticipantyour wrong.
April 8, 2008 at 4:01 PM #183118little ladyParticipant“You’ll know we’re near the bottom when you **don’t** see multiple families looking at an over-priced 1970s tract shack that’s “on sale” for $450K.”
We don’t…….even the great ones @ that price…..
Houses that are selling round here are sub 400k…..that is why I am thinking maybe SANTEE and others like it ARE bottoming out……….
BUT I AM WRONG……..right?
April 8, 2008 at 4:01 PM #183130little ladyParticipant“You’ll know we’re near the bottom when you **don’t** see multiple families looking at an over-priced 1970s tract shack that’s “on sale” for $450K.”
We don’t…….even the great ones @ that price…..
Houses that are selling round here are sub 400k…..that is why I am thinking maybe SANTEE and others like it ARE bottoming out……….
BUT I AM WRONG……..right?
April 8, 2008 at 4:01 PM #183158little ladyParticipant“You’ll know we’re near the bottom when you **don’t** see multiple families looking at an over-priced 1970s tract shack that’s “on sale” for $450K.”
We don’t…….even the great ones @ that price…..
Houses that are selling round here are sub 400k…..that is why I am thinking maybe SANTEE and others like it ARE bottoming out……….
BUT I AM WRONG……..right?
April 8, 2008 at 4:01 PM #183166little ladyParticipant“You’ll know we’re near the bottom when you **don’t** see multiple families looking at an over-priced 1970s tract shack that’s “on sale” for $450K.”
We don’t…….even the great ones @ that price…..
Houses that are selling round here are sub 400k…..that is why I am thinking maybe SANTEE and others like it ARE bottoming out……….
BUT I AM WRONG……..right?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.