- This topic has 385 replies, 27 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 22, 2009 at 10:06 AM #352575February 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM #352037Allan from FallbrookParticipant
Username: Fired the Benelli a couple of times during torture testing on semi-auto shotguns. The tests included Remington’s militarized version of the 1100/1187 series, and the Benelli blew every one of the competitors away (no pun intended).
I’m not a fun of semi-auto shotguns for “work” (because of the malfunction dangers), but this was the Rolls-Royce of the bunch. Easy to handle, minimal recoil and it cycled everything flawlessly. Clean design, too.
February 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM #352352Allan from FallbrookParticipantUsername: Fired the Benelli a couple of times during torture testing on semi-auto shotguns. The tests included Remington’s militarized version of the 1100/1187 series, and the Benelli blew every one of the competitors away (no pun intended).
I’m not a fun of semi-auto shotguns for “work” (because of the malfunction dangers), but this was the Rolls-Royce of the bunch. Easy to handle, minimal recoil and it cycled everything flawlessly. Clean design, too.
February 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM #352481Allan from FallbrookParticipantUsername: Fired the Benelli a couple of times during torture testing on semi-auto shotguns. The tests included Remington’s militarized version of the 1100/1187 series, and the Benelli blew every one of the competitors away (no pun intended).
I’m not a fun of semi-auto shotguns for “work” (because of the malfunction dangers), but this was the Rolls-Royce of the bunch. Easy to handle, minimal recoil and it cycled everything flawlessly. Clean design, too.
February 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM #352513Allan from FallbrookParticipantUsername: Fired the Benelli a couple of times during torture testing on semi-auto shotguns. The tests included Remington’s militarized version of the 1100/1187 series, and the Benelli blew every one of the competitors away (no pun intended).
I’m not a fun of semi-auto shotguns for “work” (because of the malfunction dangers), but this was the Rolls-Royce of the bunch. Easy to handle, minimal recoil and it cycled everything flawlessly. Clean design, too.
February 22, 2009 at 10:44 AM #352615Allan from FallbrookParticipantUsername: Fired the Benelli a couple of times during torture testing on semi-auto shotguns. The tests included Remington’s militarized version of the 1100/1187 series, and the Benelli blew every one of the competitors away (no pun intended).
I’m not a fun of semi-auto shotguns for “work” (because of the malfunction dangers), but this was the Rolls-Royce of the bunch. Easy to handle, minimal recoil and it cycled everything flawlessly. Clean design, too.
February 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM #352057temeculaguyParticipant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=temeculaguy]speaking of tuesday, are wearing nametags, hats, buttons, or our underwear on the outside? Or are we just winging it. I’ll be easy to find, I’ll be the only one actually glancing at the Laker/Thunder game. [/quote]
It’s Monday (ie tomorrow), not Tuesday…
Good point about recognition but at this point I’d say let’s just wing it. If I remember I will make a little sign or something (but that’s the kind of thing I may or may not remember).
rich[/quote]
Thank goodness, I thought it was monday, I remember checking the laker schedule and it was a non game day, but then saw sd mention Tuesday and figured maybe I considered the Oklahoma Thunder a non game.
February 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM #352372temeculaguyParticipant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=temeculaguy]speaking of tuesday, are wearing nametags, hats, buttons, or our underwear on the outside? Or are we just winging it. I’ll be easy to find, I’ll be the only one actually glancing at the Laker/Thunder game. [/quote]
It’s Monday (ie tomorrow), not Tuesday…
Good point about recognition but at this point I’d say let’s just wing it. If I remember I will make a little sign or something (but that’s the kind of thing I may or may not remember).
rich[/quote]
Thank goodness, I thought it was monday, I remember checking the laker schedule and it was a non game day, but then saw sd mention Tuesday and figured maybe I considered the Oklahoma Thunder a non game.
February 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM #352501temeculaguyParticipant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=temeculaguy]speaking of tuesday, are wearing nametags, hats, buttons, or our underwear on the outside? Or are we just winging it. I’ll be easy to find, I’ll be the only one actually glancing at the Laker/Thunder game. [/quote]
It’s Monday (ie tomorrow), not Tuesday…
Good point about recognition but at this point I’d say let’s just wing it. If I remember I will make a little sign or something (but that’s the kind of thing I may or may not remember).
rich[/quote]
Thank goodness, I thought it was monday, I remember checking the laker schedule and it was a non game day, but then saw sd mention Tuesday and figured maybe I considered the Oklahoma Thunder a non game.
February 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM #352533temeculaguyParticipant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=temeculaguy]speaking of tuesday, are wearing nametags, hats, buttons, or our underwear on the outside? Or are we just winging it. I’ll be easy to find, I’ll be the only one actually glancing at the Laker/Thunder game. [/quote]
It’s Monday (ie tomorrow), not Tuesday…
Good point about recognition but at this point I’d say let’s just wing it. If I remember I will make a little sign or something (but that’s the kind of thing I may or may not remember).
rich[/quote]
Thank goodness, I thought it was monday, I remember checking the laker schedule and it was a non game day, but then saw sd mention Tuesday and figured maybe I considered the Oklahoma Thunder a non game.
February 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM #352635temeculaguyParticipant[quote=Rich Toscano][quote=temeculaguy]speaking of tuesday, are wearing nametags, hats, buttons, or our underwear on the outside? Or are we just winging it. I’ll be easy to find, I’ll be the only one actually glancing at the Laker/Thunder game. [/quote]
It’s Monday (ie tomorrow), not Tuesday…
Good point about recognition but at this point I’d say let’s just wing it. If I remember I will make a little sign or something (but that’s the kind of thing I may or may not remember).
rich[/quote]
Thank goodness, I thought it was monday, I remember checking the laker schedule and it was a non game day, but then saw sd mention Tuesday and figured maybe I considered the Oklahoma Thunder a non game.
February 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM #352128AecetiaParticipantTG:
I think you should wear your underwear on your head at the Piggington meeting.
February 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM #352442AecetiaParticipantTG:
I think you should wear your underwear on your head at the Piggington meeting.
February 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM #352571AecetiaParticipantTG:
I think you should wear your underwear on your head at the Piggington meeting.
February 22, 2009 at 12:58 PM #352603AecetiaParticipantTG:
I think you should wear your underwear on your head at the Piggington meeting.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.