griffin federal reserve

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor][quote=davelj][quote=investor]People fighting griffin’s ideas just don’t want to question their own firmly held beliefs and get angry when you do. So what. Close mindedness is never appealing risk…[/quote]

Pot calls kettle black.

You Conveniently disappeared for a few months after you last brought up Griffin and I pointed out in clear prose – using his own words – that this man does not even understand the basics of banking. Please feel free to pick up the thread.

http://piggington.com/do_you_know_what_the_federal_reserve_is?page=4%5B/quote%5D
davelj. I work for a living. I cannot spend much of my time writing blogs. My blogs are more to enhance interest in subjects rather that stupidly arguing with you and dave from fallbrook. Both of you waste my time with your off the mark replies. But, I’ll try again. [/quote]

Ah yes, you work for a living. I forgot. So all of those conference calls with George Soros and Seth Klarman kept you away from the Pigg. Understand completely.

I actually work too. In fact, I’m away from the Pigg for months at a time as well, in various stretches. But I’m sensitive to following up on questions/comments that people have regarding comments that I MAKE in THREADS THAT I START. I don’t let those drop if the thread is still active. But that’s just me.

So, I think the best thing to do is just to re-activate the original thread so that you can pick up where you left off.[/quote]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.

[davelj]

[quote=investor]I don’t understand. [/quote]

That much is quite clear.

[davelj]

[quote=investor]I don’t understand. [/quote]

That much is quite clear.

[davelj]

[quote=investor]I don’t understand. [/quote]

That much is quite clear.

[davelj]

[quote=investor]I don’t understand. [/quote]

That much is quite clear.

[davelj]

[quote=investor]I don’t understand. [/quote]

That much is quite clear.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Two doctorates, totaling 16 years of collage. But congrates on yours, that is alot of work and you should be proud of them. (I’m not being sarcastic either).[/quote]

Investor: Okay, I’ve been watching this back and forth with you and Dave (the “real” Dave and not Dave from Fallbrook, whom I’m presuming is one of my long-lost cousins we don’t talk about in the family anymore), and I have to call BS on you.

I work with several PhDs (engineering and physics) and they are all excellent communicators, especially in written form. For you to assert that you hold not one, but two, PhDs and then use “alot” is simply laughable. I’d go into the other grammatical and syntaxical errors, but I don’t have the time.

The other thing I would point out is that one of the intangibles of advanced education, especially doctoral work, is that it should confer a sense of open-mindedness, along with a sense of fair play and respect for the “rules” (empiricism). When confronted with facts that dispute your worldview, you fall back on either ad hominem attacks or these solipsistic gyrations that inevitably lead to ad hominem attacks (such as questioning the disputant’s character, pedigree, etc).

Not the way to properly argue, and it only further erodes your credibility.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Two doctorates, totaling 16 years of collage. But congrates on yours, that is alot of work and you should be proud of them. (I’m not being sarcastic either).[/quote]

Investor: Okay, I’ve been watching this back and forth with you and Dave (the “real” Dave and not Dave from Fallbrook, whom I’m presuming is one of my long-lost cousins we don’t talk about in the family anymore), and I have to call BS on you.

I work with several PhDs (engineering and physics) and they are all excellent communicators, especially in written form. For you to assert that you hold not one, but two, PhDs and then use “alot” is simply laughable. I’d go into the other grammatical and syntaxical errors, but I don’t have the time.

The other thing I would point out is that one of the intangibles of advanced education, especially doctoral work, is that it should confer a sense of open-mindedness, along with a sense of fair play and respect for the “rules” (empiricism). When confronted with facts that dispute your worldview, you fall back on either ad hominem attacks or these solipsistic gyrations that inevitably lead to ad hominem attacks (such as questioning the disputant’s character, pedigree, etc).

Not the way to properly argue, and it only further erodes your credibility.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Two doctorates, totaling 16 years of collage. But congrates on yours, that is alot of work and you should be proud of them. (I’m not being sarcastic either).[/quote]

Investor: Okay, I’ve been watching this back and forth with you and Dave (the “real” Dave and not Dave from Fallbrook, whom I’m presuming is one of my long-lost cousins we don’t talk about in the family anymore), and I have to call BS on you.

I work with several PhDs (engineering and physics) and they are all excellent communicators, especially in written form. For you to assert that you hold not one, but two, PhDs and then use “alot” is simply laughable. I’d go into the other grammatical and syntaxical errors, but I don’t have the time.

The other thing I would point out is that one of the intangibles of advanced education, especially doctoral work, is that it should confer a sense of open-mindedness, along with a sense of fair play and respect for the “rules” (empiricism). When confronted with facts that dispute your worldview, you fall back on either ad hominem attacks or these solipsistic gyrations that inevitably lead to ad hominem attacks (such as questioning the disputant’s character, pedigree, etc).

Not the way to properly argue, and it only further erodes your credibility.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Two doctorates, totaling 16 years of collage. But congrates on yours, that is alot of work and you should be proud of them. (I’m not being sarcastic either).[/quote]

Investor: Okay, I’ve been watching this back and forth with you and Dave (the “real” Dave and not Dave from Fallbrook, whom I’m presuming is one of my long-lost cousins we don’t talk about in the family anymore), and I have to call BS on you.

I work with several PhDs (engineering and physics) and they are all excellent communicators, especially in written form. For you to assert that you hold not one, but two, PhDs and then use “alot” is simply laughable. I’d go into the other grammatical and syntaxical errors, but I don’t have the time.

The other thing I would point out is that one of the intangibles of advanced education, especially doctoral work, is that it should confer a sense of open-mindedness, along with a sense of fair play and respect for the “rules” (empiricism). When confronted with facts that dispute your worldview, you fall back on either ad hominem attacks or these solipsistic gyrations that inevitably lead to ad hominem attacks (such as questioning the disputant’s character, pedigree, etc).

Not the way to properly argue, and it only further erodes your credibility.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Two doctorates, totaling 16 years of collage. But congrates on yours, that is alot of work and you should be proud of them. (I’m not being sarcastic either).[/quote]

Investor: Okay, I’ve been watching this back and forth with you and Dave (the “real” Dave and not Dave from Fallbrook, whom I’m presuming is one of my long-lost cousins we don’t talk about in the family anymore), and I have to call BS on you.

I work with several PhDs (engineering and physics) and they are all excellent communicators, especially in written form. For you to assert that you hold not one, but two, PhDs and then use “alot” is simply laughable. I’d go into the other grammatical and syntaxical errors, but I don’t have the time.

The other thing I would point out is that one of the intangibles of advanced education, especially doctoral work, is that it should confer a sense of open-mindedness, along with a sense of fair play and respect for the “rules” (empiricism). When confronted with facts that dispute your worldview, you fall back on either ad hominem attacks or these solipsistic gyrations that inevitably lead to ad hominem attacks (such as questioning the disputant’s character, pedigree, etc).

Not the way to properly argue, and it only further erodes your credibility.

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]

Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]

Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]

Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
I just reviewed alot of the original tread. Aside from the joy of battling sarcastic wit with some of you, I have learned nothing new from most of the threads. Some of you are more interested in defending established ideas rather than questioning the status quo. Not worth my time frankly.[/quote]

Allow me to translate: “Not worth my time frankly” means, “I have no rebuttal so I will come up with an excuse for not doing so. My excuse is: It’s ‘not worth my time.’ I’m a Very Important Person with Two Doctorates and 16 Years of Collage, for Christ’s sake!! I’m an “INVESTOR”!! And an Artist!!”

[Author]

Posts