Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › griffin federal reserve
- This topic has 750 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 8:28 PM #618099October 12, 2010 at 8:43 PM #617052daveljParticipant
[quote=investor]
Rich. I don’t blame you if you are not reading these worthless responses to my two entries…[/quote]Good news, “investor”. Rich is indeed reading this thread. Beyond that, I’m going to respect his privacy. Obviously, he can always chime in if he so chooses. (You may not know, but his policy for the last couple of years has been to post only in threads he starts or to questions about something he’s specifically posted previously.) But suffice it to say that he’s enjoying the thread – I’ll leave it at that.
October 12, 2010 at 8:43 PM #617138daveljParticipant[quote=investor]
Rich. I don’t blame you if you are not reading these worthless responses to my two entries…[/quote]Good news, “investor”. Rich is indeed reading this thread. Beyond that, I’m going to respect his privacy. Obviously, he can always chime in if he so chooses. (You may not know, but his policy for the last couple of years has been to post only in threads he starts or to questions about something he’s specifically posted previously.) But suffice it to say that he’s enjoying the thread – I’ll leave it at that.
October 12, 2010 at 8:43 PM #617684daveljParticipant[quote=investor]
Rich. I don’t blame you if you are not reading these worthless responses to my two entries…[/quote]Good news, “investor”. Rich is indeed reading this thread. Beyond that, I’m going to respect his privacy. Obviously, he can always chime in if he so chooses. (You may not know, but his policy for the last couple of years has been to post only in threads he starts or to questions about something he’s specifically posted previously.) But suffice it to say that he’s enjoying the thread – I’ll leave it at that.
October 12, 2010 at 8:43 PM #617804daveljParticipant[quote=investor]
Rich. I don’t blame you if you are not reading these worthless responses to my two entries…[/quote]Good news, “investor”. Rich is indeed reading this thread. Beyond that, I’m going to respect his privacy. Obviously, he can always chime in if he so chooses. (You may not know, but his policy for the last couple of years has been to post only in threads he starts or to questions about something he’s specifically posted previously.) But suffice it to say that he’s enjoying the thread – I’ll leave it at that.
October 12, 2010 at 8:43 PM #618117daveljParticipant[quote=investor]
Rich. I don’t blame you if you are not reading these worthless responses to my two entries…[/quote]Good news, “investor”. Rich is indeed reading this thread. Beyond that, I’m going to respect his privacy. Obviously, he can always chime in if he so chooses. (You may not know, but his policy for the last couple of years has been to post only in threads he starts or to questions about something he’s specifically posted previously.) But suffice it to say that he’s enjoying the thread – I’ll leave it at that.
October 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM #617101SK in CVParticipantI can’t believe i missed the damn party.
(And i never considered myself an academic. I am, however, seriously thinking of calling myself a doctor. Who wants to volunteer to be my first patient? Fresh gloves, i promise.)
October 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM #617187SK in CVParticipantI can’t believe i missed the damn party.
(And i never considered myself an academic. I am, however, seriously thinking of calling myself a doctor. Who wants to volunteer to be my first patient? Fresh gloves, i promise.)
October 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM #617733SK in CVParticipantI can’t believe i missed the damn party.
(And i never considered myself an academic. I am, however, seriously thinking of calling myself a doctor. Who wants to volunteer to be my first patient? Fresh gloves, i promise.)
October 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM #617854SK in CVParticipantI can’t believe i missed the damn party.
(And i never considered myself an academic. I am, however, seriously thinking of calling myself a doctor. Who wants to volunteer to be my first patient? Fresh gloves, i promise.)
October 12, 2010 at 10:11 PM #618167SK in CVParticipantI can’t believe i missed the damn party.
(And i never considered myself an academic. I am, however, seriously thinking of calling myself a doctor. Who wants to volunteer to be my first patient? Fresh gloves, i promise.)
October 13, 2010 at 7:32 AM #617186(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.
Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.
In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?October 13, 2010 at 7:32 AM #617272(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.
Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.
In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?October 13, 2010 at 7:32 AM #617817(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.
Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.
In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ?October 13, 2010 at 7:32 AM #617935(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant[quote=investor][quote=FormerSanDiegan]I don’t have time to write a response to this very interesting topic, so this is a post to tell people that I would have a very well-thought out reponse, if only I had the time two do so, but I don’t and I have a PhD too so don’t think I am stupid or something, so if I had more time I would read the 237 word (or so) post further up that has no paragraph breaks and try to decipher something that is debatable in it because surely there is something to it that I could either agree with or disagree with and provide links to supporting third party opinions or facts to back up my position as to whether or not the post has merit.[/quote]
I don’t know how to highlight parts of quotes so that is why it reads like a run on sentence. But, is that the only response you have to the topic? You point out typos as intelligent responses? Same stupid method as Allen from Fallbrook and davelj.Why don’t you get back to the topic?[/quote]I don’t know what you are talking about. I was not pointing out any typos, simply just typing what came to mind after reading through (well, skimming through) this thread. I made a post about … well… about posting nothing, but you still seemed to find fault with it and put me into a category of people who according to you use “stupid methods.” As far as I can tell the topic here is how people respond to other people on this blog, their qualifications and degrees and their personal beliefs on how one should or should not respond to post with or without cogent thought. In that vein I am simply trying to post thoughts in those same areas and trying to fit in with this thread since it is the hottest thread on the board the last couple of days.
Anyway, I think the motivation for creating a conspiracy that is ultamately hatched long after you are dead (like the Federal Reserve in 1913) is so that you can create mystery and aura about yourself and give nutty authors stuff to write about.
In that vein, so far I have no offers from anyone to join my club in which club members will conspire to rule the universe. The plan will take some time and the expected fruition will be in 2108 or 2109.
We lay the ground work now to destroy the economy of the entire universe (not just Earth, we have to think big here because it’s in the future), while enriching our members. The plan will take some time to hatch, but in the end our members will rule the financial universe. If all goes well the plan will run its course by 2107 or 2109 at the latest.
Who’s with me ? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.