griffin federal reserve

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back?
[/quote]

Actually it’s a full-fledged orgy. Me, Allan, SK and six (female!) strippers from Argentina (sorry guys, I just couldn’t keep it a secret any longer!). I was going to invite you but I thought you’d be too busy with all of the important meetings with other billionaire “investors”. Next time, though.

[quote=investor]
My degrees are NOT in finance.
[/quote]

Right. We understand that part now. They don’t exist.

[quote=investor]
But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post.
[/quote]

Right. The Federal Reserve post from… what… five months back? What, you didn’t remember that you had your PhD’s back then? Or you’ve purchased them from a diploma mill in the interim?

[quote=investor]
But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Look, we all know there’s nothing to reveal. They don’t exist. Hasn’t this charade gone on long enough? Well I, for one, hope not!![/quote]

Well, I guess it is a compliment that you don’t believe that I have two doctorates (and a bachelors). They are hanging on my wall and they are not in the business field.
I have spent the last 10 years learning the investment world (UC of degenerate, wouldn’t it have been better if I had said “world of investing” rather than investing world? Wish I had thought of that), having bought and sold 7.7 million worth of real estate (both side of the sales side now) in the past 5 years. Took a bath in the real estate market but I was a “real estate professional” for one of the years so I could claim all of the capital gain losses against my earned income in one year. Bought and sold 3 homes, held them for at least 2 years each to take advantage of the personal capital gains exclusion on each of them.
Read many books on the subject of investing and discovered that the only people who know about investing are the ones who actually do it and can live on their passive income without working for the rest of their life. That, to me, is the key to defining an investor. Someone who can live off of their passive income forever. Working for money only if they choose to. Investing is something that I have a keen interest in, and when I read the griffin book, I felt that I had discovered a whole new world of knowledge that few people know much about.
This was the first blog that I have written on. I didn’t think that the responses would be so verbally violent, but I guess they are. Davelj: I don’t give a rat’s A** if you believe me or not about the degrees. I have them; I’m not going to reveal them for privacy reasons. They don’t mean anything as an investor except that I make 550 K per year gross income from them. (That will probably get some negative responses from people.)Some of that in passive income where I don’t pay Medicare/ social security taxes and where I can depreciate real estate against it as well. There are people who make so much more than I do that I am a pauper so I don’t say that bragging. Some in my own field. I worked hard for them so I could earn that kind of money and I was blessed to be able to achieve them, much like some of you, who have worked hard for your advanced positions in life as well.
Any other true investors out there, not this rag tag bunch of crass blowhards, please chime in. I would love to hear what you are thinking about the next 2-10 years in the investing world, knowing what you do about the central banking/ national debt/ inability of either political party to have a balanced budget. You do risk having some really negative things said of you, but, that seems to be the nature of blogging.
Rich. I don’t blame you if you are not reading these worthless responses to my two entries, but I was wondering how much of your clients portfolio you are putting into gold/ silver? Gold may go down in the short term but over the next 3-8 years, don’t you think it will really go up with the amount of money being printed?

[Anonymous]

In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?

[Anonymous]

In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?

[Anonymous]

In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?

[Anonymous]

In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?

[Anonymous]

In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Investor: Which “Money Matters” film are you referencing? There’s an excellent chance I’ve seen it already, but I’m curious as to the author.

So we’re clear, I never said or even implied that you’re Griffin (book’s author). I did say, however, that Griffin was a noted crank and this sort of background impinges on his writings. Like it or not, it goes to credibility.

Also, so we’re clear: The Fed is audited annually and the results are published. You make a good point regarding ownership and I’ll cheerfully concede that point. But, and this is important as well, that lack of ownership transparency does not mean that there’s a conspiracy afoot or a cover-up taking place. The Fed absolutely should make the ownership public and offer as much transparency as they can without compromising operations or security.

All of this is said with an eye towards reciprocity. You need to be able to parse opposing responses without taking offense or treating someone disagreeing with you as a mortal enemy. As far as you taking shots at me, have at it. We’re all adults here and I could personally care less. I don’t take it to heart, nor should you.[/quote]
Allen. Nice to finally meet you. It is the DVD “The money masters” by bill still. Sorry about the wrong title, I just went downstairs and reread the title. I’d love to get your and SV CV’s input on them. (Cordially though).
Now, these Federal Reserve audits that are done, can you give me a web site/ paper that I can get to read what’s in them. It is probably going to be 2,000 pages but I would like to check griffin’s and Paul’s opinion that it hasn’t been fully audited. Thank you for noting that a lack of transparency does not mean a cover up. I agree completely. It is just that when you are dealing with the country’s money supply, transparency is critical.
I don’t take disagreements personally, only personal attacks. (I wonder what UC of degenerate thinks of that wording. I bet it could be written better). If you read the last 3 pages of this thread and don’t think I have been personally attacked, I don’t know what to say.

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Investor: Which “Money Matters” film are you referencing? There’s an excellent chance I’ve seen it already, but I’m curious as to the author.

So we’re clear, I never said or even implied that you’re Griffin (book’s author). I did say, however, that Griffin was a noted crank and this sort of background impinges on his writings. Like it or not, it goes to credibility.

Also, so we’re clear: The Fed is audited annually and the results are published. You make a good point regarding ownership and I’ll cheerfully concede that point. But, and this is important as well, that lack of ownership transparency does not mean that there’s a conspiracy afoot or a cover-up taking place. The Fed absolutely should make the ownership public and offer as much transparency as they can without compromising operations or security.

All of this is said with an eye towards reciprocity. You need to be able to parse opposing responses without taking offense or treating someone disagreeing with you as a mortal enemy. As far as you taking shots at me, have at it. We’re all adults here and I could personally care less. I don’t take it to heart, nor should you.[/quote]
Allen. Nice to finally meet you. It is the DVD “The money masters” by bill still. Sorry about the wrong title, I just went downstairs and reread the title. I’d love to get your and SV CV’s input on them. (Cordially though).
Now, these Federal Reserve audits that are done, can you give me a web site/ paper that I can get to read what’s in them. It is probably going to be 2,000 pages but I would like to check griffin’s and Paul’s opinion that it hasn’t been fully audited. Thank you for noting that a lack of transparency does not mean a cover up. I agree completely. It is just that when you are dealing with the country’s money supply, transparency is critical.
I don’t take disagreements personally, only personal attacks. (I wonder what UC of degenerate thinks of that wording. I bet it could be written better). If you read the last 3 pages of this thread and don’t think I have been personally attacked, I don’t know what to say.

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Investor: Which “Money Matters” film are you referencing? There’s an excellent chance I’ve seen it already, but I’m curious as to the author.

So we’re clear, I never said or even implied that you’re Griffin (book’s author). I did say, however, that Griffin was a noted crank and this sort of background impinges on his writings. Like it or not, it goes to credibility.

Also, so we’re clear: The Fed is audited annually and the results are published. You make a good point regarding ownership and I’ll cheerfully concede that point. But, and this is important as well, that lack of ownership transparency does not mean that there’s a conspiracy afoot or a cover-up taking place. The Fed absolutely should make the ownership public and offer as much transparency as they can without compromising operations or security.

All of this is said with an eye towards reciprocity. You need to be able to parse opposing responses without taking offense or treating someone disagreeing with you as a mortal enemy. As far as you taking shots at me, have at it. We’re all adults here and I could personally care less. I don’t take it to heart, nor should you.[/quote]
Allen. Nice to finally meet you. It is the DVD “The money masters” by bill still. Sorry about the wrong title, I just went downstairs and reread the title. I’d love to get your and SV CV’s input on them. (Cordially though).
Now, these Federal Reserve audits that are done, can you give me a web site/ paper that I can get to read what’s in them. It is probably going to be 2,000 pages but I would like to check griffin’s and Paul’s opinion that it hasn’t been fully audited. Thank you for noting that a lack of transparency does not mean a cover up. I agree completely. It is just that when you are dealing with the country’s money supply, transparency is critical.
I don’t take disagreements personally, only personal attacks. (I wonder what UC of degenerate thinks of that wording. I bet it could be written better). If you read the last 3 pages of this thread and don’t think I have been personally attacked, I don’t know what to say.

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Investor: Which “Money Matters” film are you referencing? There’s an excellent chance I’ve seen it already, but I’m curious as to the author.

So we’re clear, I never said or even implied that you’re Griffin (book’s author). I did say, however, that Griffin was a noted crank and this sort of background impinges on his writings. Like it or not, it goes to credibility.

Also, so we’re clear: The Fed is audited annually and the results are published. You make a good point regarding ownership and I’ll cheerfully concede that point. But, and this is important as well, that lack of ownership transparency does not mean that there’s a conspiracy afoot or a cover-up taking place. The Fed absolutely should make the ownership public and offer as much transparency as they can without compromising operations or security.

All of this is said with an eye towards reciprocity. You need to be able to parse opposing responses without taking offense or treating someone disagreeing with you as a mortal enemy. As far as you taking shots at me, have at it. We’re all adults here and I could personally care less. I don’t take it to heart, nor should you.[/quote]
Allen. Nice to finally meet you. It is the DVD “The money masters” by bill still. Sorry about the wrong title, I just went downstairs and reread the title. I’d love to get your and SV CV’s input on them. (Cordially though).
Now, these Federal Reserve audits that are done, can you give me a web site/ paper that I can get to read what’s in them. It is probably going to be 2,000 pages but I would like to check griffin’s and Paul’s opinion that it hasn’t been fully audited. Thank you for noting that a lack of transparency does not mean a cover up. I agree completely. It is just that when you are dealing with the country’s money supply, transparency is critical.
I don’t take disagreements personally, only personal attacks. (I wonder what UC of degenerate thinks of that wording. I bet it could be written better). If you read the last 3 pages of this thread and don’t think I have been personally attacked, I don’t know what to say.

[investor]

[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Investor: Which “Money Matters” film are you referencing? There’s an excellent chance I’ve seen it already, but I’m curious as to the author.

So we’re clear, I never said or even implied that you’re Griffin (book’s author). I did say, however, that Griffin was a noted crank and this sort of background impinges on his writings. Like it or not, it goes to credibility.

Also, so we’re clear: The Fed is audited annually and the results are published. You make a good point regarding ownership and I’ll cheerfully concede that point. But, and this is important as well, that lack of ownership transparency does not mean that there’s a conspiracy afoot or a cover-up taking place. The Fed absolutely should make the ownership public and offer as much transparency as they can without compromising operations or security.

All of this is said with an eye towards reciprocity. You need to be able to parse opposing responses without taking offense or treating someone disagreeing with you as a mortal enemy. As far as you taking shots at me, have at it. We’re all adults here and I could personally care less. I don’t take it to heart, nor should you.[/quote]
Allen. Nice to finally meet you. It is the DVD “The money masters” by bill still. Sorry about the wrong title, I just went downstairs and reread the title. I’d love to get your and SV CV’s input on them. (Cordially though).
Now, these Federal Reserve audits that are done, can you give me a web site/ paper that I can get to read what’s in them. It is probably going to be 2,000 pages but I would like to check griffin’s and Paul’s opinion that it hasn’t been fully audited. Thank you for noting that a lack of transparency does not mean a cover up. I agree completely. It is just that when you are dealing with the country’s money supply, transparency is critical.
I don’t take disagreements personally, only personal attacks. (I wonder what UC of degenerate thinks of that wording. I bet it could be written better). If you read the last 3 pages of this thread and don’t think I have been personally attacked, I don’t know what to say.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[investor]

[quote=pri_dk]In an attempt to get something of value out of this thread (outside of a little sport, which has grown old):

Can someone, other than our friend “investor,” explain to me the motivation for the secrecy behind the Fed’s ownership?

It is a bit curious, and seems to be to do much to fan the conspiracy theory flames.

What’s the wisdom behind this structure?[/quote]
Finally, a thought on topic. Since I was asked to not reply to the question, I won’t.

[Author]

Posts