griffin federal reserve

[investor]

[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong. I wasted my time doing so. Will you say that you were wrong or will you try to wiggle out of it? (I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.[/quote]

SK from CV brought up his CPA credentials in the context of an issue that related to accounting. He was offering up his experience as part of the reply. So, he gets a pass.

Allan from Fallbrook brought up my and SK from CV’s credentials – he did NOT bring up HIS OWN. Now that may not have been the strongest part of his argument but, again, he was referencing OTHERS.

YOU, on the other hand, offered up YOUR OWN fictional PhD’s as proof of your own Mr. Smartypantsedness, and completely out of context of the discussion at hand. It was merely thrown out there as if to say, “And neener neener neener – I’m smarter than both of you combined because of all of my fancy edumacation.”

Please tell me you see the difference.

And, since you want to keep this going, tell us what your two fictional PhD’s have to do with banking and finance, which is the topic of discussion here.[/quote]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back? My degrees are NOT in finance. But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post. But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Allen brought up the fact that he knew some seal members in another thread. People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people. If Allen was a ranger, he does not need to tag along on the heals of anyone. I spent 5 years in the air force and I have a lot of respect for other military members. I just don’t see why Allen has to resort to typos and smearing someone for them in order to make his intellectual points. As for the degrees out my ass, read the last post on page too (oooh, oooh he did it again. Allen, SV CV. davelj lookie, lookie!!!), to see where Allen and SV cv brought it up from the federal reserve thread, not me. I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.[/quote]

Investor: That whooshing sound is the point going clear over your head.

It wasn’t the typos I was pointing out, it was your inability to formulate a proper argument, combined with a very poor set of writing skills, including hackneyed grammar and syntax. Words mean things, and the ability to make one’s point cogently speaks volumes about education, upbringing and interpersonal skills.

Its analogous to someone standing on a street corner, wearing an “End is Near” sandwich board, and fulminating at everyone within earshot that we’re all doomed. Perhaps we are, but the speaker has no credibility with his potential listeners because of who he is and how his message is framed.

Same goes for you. You stridently demand that others answer your questions, but you don’t bother to answer theirs (unless, of course, they agree with you). You don’t engage in honest debate, and instead retreat behind name calling, or throw out your supposed academic prowess as a means to silence others. Like I said, if you want to debate this honestly, step up. Otherwise, its just more bloviating and watching this painful cut-and-paste tirade. Speaking of which, the instructions for posting, including quoting others, is contained below your comment when you reply. Just FYI.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Allen brought up the fact that he knew some seal members in another thread. People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people. If Allen was a ranger, he does not need to tag along on the heals of anyone. I spent 5 years in the air force and I have a lot of respect for other military members. I just don’t see why Allen has to resort to typos and smearing someone for them in order to make his intellectual points. As for the degrees out my ass, read the last post on page too (oooh, oooh he did it again. Allen, SV CV. davelj lookie, lookie!!!), to see where Allen and SV cv brought it up from the federal reserve thread, not me. I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.[/quote]

Investor: That whooshing sound is the point going clear over your head.

It wasn’t the typos I was pointing out, it was your inability to formulate a proper argument, combined with a very poor set of writing skills, including hackneyed grammar and syntax. Words mean things, and the ability to make one’s point cogently speaks volumes about education, upbringing and interpersonal skills.

Its analogous to someone standing on a street corner, wearing an “End is Near” sandwich board, and fulminating at everyone within earshot that we’re all doomed. Perhaps we are, but the speaker has no credibility with his potential listeners because of who he is and how his message is framed.

Same goes for you. You stridently demand that others answer your questions, but you don’t bother to answer theirs (unless, of course, they agree with you). You don’t engage in honest debate, and instead retreat behind name calling, or throw out your supposed academic prowess as a means to silence others. Like I said, if you want to debate this honestly, step up. Otherwise, its just more bloviating and watching this painful cut-and-paste tirade. Speaking of which, the instructions for posting, including quoting others, is contained below your comment when you reply. Just FYI.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Allen brought up the fact that he knew some seal members in another thread. People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people. If Allen was a ranger, he does not need to tag along on the heals of anyone. I spent 5 years in the air force and I have a lot of respect for other military members. I just don’t see why Allen has to resort to typos and smearing someone for them in order to make his intellectual points. As for the degrees out my ass, read the last post on page too (oooh, oooh he did it again. Allen, SV CV. davelj lookie, lookie!!!), to see where Allen and SV cv brought it up from the federal reserve thread, not me. I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.[/quote]

Investor: That whooshing sound is the point going clear over your head.

It wasn’t the typos I was pointing out, it was your inability to formulate a proper argument, combined with a very poor set of writing skills, including hackneyed grammar and syntax. Words mean things, and the ability to make one’s point cogently speaks volumes about education, upbringing and interpersonal skills.

Its analogous to someone standing on a street corner, wearing an “End is Near” sandwich board, and fulminating at everyone within earshot that we’re all doomed. Perhaps we are, but the speaker has no credibility with his potential listeners because of who he is and how his message is framed.

Same goes for you. You stridently demand that others answer your questions, but you don’t bother to answer theirs (unless, of course, they agree with you). You don’t engage in honest debate, and instead retreat behind name calling, or throw out your supposed academic prowess as a means to silence others. Like I said, if you want to debate this honestly, step up. Otherwise, its just more bloviating and watching this painful cut-and-paste tirade. Speaking of which, the instructions for posting, including quoting others, is contained below your comment when you reply. Just FYI.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Allen brought up the fact that he knew some seal members in another thread. People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people. If Allen was a ranger, he does not need to tag along on the heals of anyone. I spent 5 years in the air force and I have a lot of respect for other military members. I just don’t see why Allen has to resort to typos and smearing someone for them in order to make his intellectual points. As for the degrees out my ass, read the last post on page too (oooh, oooh he did it again. Allen, SV CV. davelj lookie, lookie!!!), to see where Allen and SV cv brought it up from the federal reserve thread, not me. I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.[/quote]

Investor: That whooshing sound is the point going clear over your head.

It wasn’t the typos I was pointing out, it was your inability to formulate a proper argument, combined with a very poor set of writing skills, including hackneyed grammar and syntax. Words mean things, and the ability to make one’s point cogently speaks volumes about education, upbringing and interpersonal skills.

Its analogous to someone standing on a street corner, wearing an “End is Near” sandwich board, and fulminating at everyone within earshot that we’re all doomed. Perhaps we are, but the speaker has no credibility with his potential listeners because of who he is and how his message is framed.

Same goes for you. You stridently demand that others answer your questions, but you don’t bother to answer theirs (unless, of course, they agree with you). You don’t engage in honest debate, and instead retreat behind name calling, or throw out your supposed academic prowess as a means to silence others. Like I said, if you want to debate this honestly, step up. Otherwise, its just more bloviating and watching this painful cut-and-paste tirade. Speaking of which, the instructions for posting, including quoting others, is contained below your comment when you reply. Just FYI.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]
Allen brought up the fact that he knew some seal members in another thread. People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people. If Allen was a ranger, he does not need to tag along on the heals of anyone. I spent 5 years in the air force and I have a lot of respect for other military members. I just don’t see why Allen has to resort to typos and smearing someone for them in order to make his intellectual points. As for the degrees out my ass, read the last post on page too (oooh, oooh he did it again. Allen, SV CV. davelj lookie, lookie!!!), to see where Allen and SV cv brought it up from the federal reserve thread, not me. I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.[/quote]

Investor: That whooshing sound is the point going clear over your head.

It wasn’t the typos I was pointing out, it was your inability to formulate a proper argument, combined with a very poor set of writing skills, including hackneyed grammar and syntax. Words mean things, and the ability to make one’s point cogently speaks volumes about education, upbringing and interpersonal skills.

Its analogous to someone standing on a street corner, wearing an “End is Near” sandwich board, and fulminating at everyone within earshot that we’re all doomed. Perhaps we are, but the speaker has no credibility with his potential listeners because of who he is and how his message is framed.

Same goes for you. You stridently demand that others answer your questions, but you don’t bother to answer theirs (unless, of course, they agree with you). You don’t engage in honest debate, and instead retreat behind name calling, or throw out your supposed academic prowess as a means to silence others. Like I said, if you want to debate this honestly, step up. Otherwise, its just more bloviating and watching this painful cut-and-paste tirade. Speaking of which, the instructions for posting, including quoting others, is contained below your comment when you reply. Just FYI.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=investor]I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Investor: Puh-leeze. If you think for one second that I care about who you are, or would violate your privacy, well, we need to add “paranoid” to your profile.

This is like arguing with a 10 year old. Once we knock down the nonsense about your professorship at Princeton and demolish your various, factually unsupported arguments, you careen off into an entirely new direction, in that we’re now out to get you.

You can abandon the palaver about your PhDs. They don’t exist. We all know it, and you know it. For the record, I never brought up degrees, either. I brought up professional backgrounds (CPA in SK’s case, banking in Dave’s) and as means of pointing out that they probably knew a thing or two of which they spoke. Apparently, you felt that your pushing of falsified academic credentials would then catapult you into an advantaged position and quiet down all those little people and their irritating, fact-based questions. Not so much, huh?

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back?
[/quote]

Actually it’s a full-fledged orgy. Me, Allan, SK and six (female!) strippers from Argentina (sorry guys, I just couldn’t keep it a secret any longer!). I was going to invite you but I thought you’d be too busy with all of the important meetings with other billionaire “investors”. Next time, though.

[quote=investor]
My degrees are NOT in finance.
[/quote]

Right. We understand that part now. They don’t exist.

[quote=investor]
But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post.
[/quote]

Right. The Federal Reserve post from… what… five months back? What, you didn’t remember that you had your PhD’s back then? Or you’ve purchased them from a diploma mill in the interim?

[quote=investor]
But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Look, we all know there’s nothing to reveal. They don’t exist. Hasn’t this charade gone on long enough? Well I, for one, hope not!!

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back?
[/quote]

Actually it’s a full-fledged orgy. Me, Allan, SK and six (female!) strippers from Argentina (sorry guys, I just couldn’t keep it a secret any longer!). I was going to invite you but I thought you’d be too busy with all of the important meetings with other billionaire “investors”. Next time, though.

[quote=investor]
My degrees are NOT in finance.
[/quote]

Right. We understand that part now. They don’t exist.

[quote=investor]
But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post.
[/quote]

Right. The Federal Reserve post from… what… five months back? What, you didn’t remember that you had your PhD’s back then? Or you’ve purchased them from a diploma mill in the interim?

[quote=investor]
But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Look, we all know there’s nothing to reveal. They don’t exist. Hasn’t this charade gone on long enough? Well I, for one, hope not!!

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back?
[/quote]

Actually it’s a full-fledged orgy. Me, Allan, SK and six (female!) strippers from Argentina (sorry guys, I just couldn’t keep it a secret any longer!). I was going to invite you but I thought you’d be too busy with all of the important meetings with other billionaire “investors”. Next time, though.

[quote=investor]
My degrees are NOT in finance.
[/quote]

Right. We understand that part now. They don’t exist.

[quote=investor]
But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post.
[/quote]

Right. The Federal Reserve post from… what… five months back? What, you didn’t remember that you had your PhD’s back then? Or you’ve purchased them from a diploma mill in the interim?

[quote=investor]
But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Look, we all know there’s nothing to reveal. They don’t exist. Hasn’t this charade gone on long enough? Well I, for one, hope not!!

[davelj]

[quote=investor]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back?
[/quote]

Actually it’s a full-fledged orgy. Me, Allan, SK and six (female!) strippers from Argentina (sorry guys, I just couldn’t keep it a secret any longer!). I was going to invite you but I thought you’d be too busy with all of the important meetings with other billionaire “investors”. Next time, though.

[quote=investor]
My degrees are NOT in finance.
[/quote]

Right. We understand that part now. They don’t exist.

[quote=investor]
But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post.
[/quote]

Right. The Federal Reserve post from… what… five months back? What, you didn’t remember that you had your PhD’s back then? Or you’ve purchased them from a diploma mill in the interim?

[quote=investor]
But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.[/quote]

Look, we all know there’s nothing to reveal. They don’t exist. Hasn’t this charade gone on long enough? Well I, for one, hope not!!

[Author]

Posts