Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › griffin federal reserve
- This topic has 750 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 3:10 PM #617739October 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM #616684investorParticipant
[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong.
[/quote]
You didn’t prove me wrong. Take a close look and read for content. The ref posting was from Allan from Fallbrook.. but he was not offering up his own degrees.. it was not self promotion. Where is the link to SV from CV making such claims?[quote investor]
(I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.
[/quote]
there is that Ad-hominem..[/quote]
Further down the thread.October 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM #616770investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong.
[/quote]
You didn’t prove me wrong. Take a close look and read for content. The ref posting was from Allan from Fallbrook.. but he was not offering up his own degrees.. it was not self promotion. Where is the link to SV from CV making such claims?[quote investor]
(I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.
[/quote]
there is that Ad-hominem..[/quote]
Further down the thread.October 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM #617314investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong.
[/quote]
You didn’t prove me wrong. Take a close look and read for content. The ref posting was from Allan from Fallbrook.. but he was not offering up his own degrees.. it was not self promotion. Where is the link to SV from CV making such claims?[quote investor]
(I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.
[/quote]
there is that Ad-hominem..[/quote]
Further down the thread.October 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM #617434investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong.
[/quote]
You didn’t prove me wrong. Take a close look and read for content. The ref posting was from Allan from Fallbrook.. but he was not offering up his own degrees.. it was not self promotion. Where is the link to SV from CV making such claims?[quote investor]
(I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.
[/quote]
there is that Ad-hominem..[/quote]
Further down the thread.October 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM #617744investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong.
[/quote]
You didn’t prove me wrong. Take a close look and read for content. The ref posting was from Allan from Fallbrook.. but he was not offering up his own degrees.. it was not self promotion. Where is the link to SV from CV making such claims?[quote investor]
(I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.
[/quote]
there is that Ad-hominem..[/quote]
Further down the thread.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #616689ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people.
[/quote]
Depends.. if you start beating your chest with statements like:
[quote investor]
Not that I don’t appreciate degrees. (I have more that you and Dave from Fallbrook combined, by the way.)
[/quote]
and then make simple 3rd grade mistakes.. It opens up the question as to whether the statement is true and whether the ‘person behind the mask’ is being truthful.
[quote investor]
I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.
[/quote]
True, true.. it is safer not to resort to ‘sword fights’ because if you live by the.. you can…
And there were many more mistakes than just collage/college(s). That is when it really became problematic. One can be almost typo-ish, but when it continues..
Or if done(sword fight started), be pedantic about ones own spelling and grammar.You never know what the real creds are of the other ‘people behind masks’.
Below may be rated ‘M’:
for those not hearing of the term as being used above:
“sword fight” = “a dick size competition”
in vernacular.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #616775ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people.
[/quote]
Depends.. if you start beating your chest with statements like:
[quote investor]
Not that I don’t appreciate degrees. (I have more that you and Dave from Fallbrook combined, by the way.)
[/quote]
and then make simple 3rd grade mistakes.. It opens up the question as to whether the statement is true and whether the ‘person behind the mask’ is being truthful.
[quote investor]
I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.
[/quote]
True, true.. it is safer not to resort to ‘sword fights’ because if you live by the.. you can…
And there were many more mistakes than just collage/college(s). That is when it really became problematic. One can be almost typo-ish, but when it continues..
Or if done(sword fight started), be pedantic about ones own spelling and grammar.You never know what the real creds are of the other ‘people behind masks’.
Below may be rated ‘M’:
for those not hearing of the term as being used above:
“sword fight” = “a dick size competition”
in vernacular.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #617319ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people.
[/quote]
Depends.. if you start beating your chest with statements like:
[quote investor]
Not that I don’t appreciate degrees. (I have more that you and Dave from Fallbrook combined, by the way.)
[/quote]
and then make simple 3rd grade mistakes.. It opens up the question as to whether the statement is true and whether the ‘person behind the mask’ is being truthful.
[quote investor]
I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.
[/quote]
True, true.. it is safer not to resort to ‘sword fights’ because if you live by the.. you can…
And there were many more mistakes than just collage/college(s). That is when it really became problematic. One can be almost typo-ish, but when it continues..
Or if done(sword fight started), be pedantic about ones own spelling and grammar.You never know what the real creds are of the other ‘people behind masks’.
Below may be rated ‘M’:
for those not hearing of the term as being used above:
“sword fight” = “a dick size competition”
in vernacular.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #617439ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people.
[/quote]
Depends.. if you start beating your chest with statements like:
[quote investor]
Not that I don’t appreciate degrees. (I have more that you and Dave from Fallbrook combined, by the way.)
[/quote]
and then make simple 3rd grade mistakes.. It opens up the question as to whether the statement is true and whether the ‘person behind the mask’ is being truthful.
[quote investor]
I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.
[/quote]
True, true.. it is safer not to resort to ‘sword fights’ because if you live by the.. you can…
And there were many more mistakes than just collage/college(s). That is when it really became problematic. One can be almost typo-ish, but when it continues..
Or if done(sword fight started), be pedantic about ones own spelling and grammar.You never know what the real creds are of the other ‘people behind masks’.
Below may be rated ‘M’:
for those not hearing of the term as being used above:
“sword fight” = “a dick size competition”
in vernacular.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #617749ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
People that pick on trivial items (like typos) in order to smear someone can be little jerks that like to tag along on the heals of bigger people.
[/quote]
Depends.. if you start beating your chest with statements like:
[quote investor]
Not that I don’t appreciate degrees. (I have more that you and Dave from Fallbrook combined, by the way.)
[/quote]
and then make simple 3rd grade mistakes.. It opens up the question as to whether the statement is true and whether the ‘person behind the mask’ is being truthful.
[quote investor]
I guess I set myself up by responding to their academic credentials and then mis-spelling colleges.
[/quote]
True, true.. it is safer not to resort to ‘sword fights’ because if you live by the.. you can…
And there were many more mistakes than just collage/college(s). That is when it really became problematic. One can be almost typo-ish, but when it continues..
Or if done(sword fight started), be pedantic about ones own spelling and grammar.You never know what the real creds are of the other ‘people behind masks’.
Below may be rated ‘M’:
for those not hearing of the term as being used above:
“sword fight” = “a dick size competition”
in vernacular.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #616694investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong. I wasted my time doing so. Will you say that you were wrong or will you try to wiggle out of it? (I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.[/quote]SK from CV brought up his CPA credentials in the context of an issue that related to accounting. He was offering up his experience as part of the reply. So, he gets a pass.
Allan from Fallbrook brought up my and SK from CV’s credentials – he did NOT bring up HIS OWN. Now that may not have been the strongest part of his argument but, again, he was referencing OTHERS.
YOU, on the other hand, offered up YOUR OWN fictional PhD’s as proof of your own Mr. Smartypantsedness, and completely out of context of the discussion at hand. It was merely thrown out there as if to say, “And neener neener neener – I’m smarter than both of you combined because of all of my fancy edumacation.”
Please tell me you see the difference.
And, since you want to keep this going, tell us what your two fictional PhD’s have to do with banking and finance, which is the topic of discussion here.[/quote]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back? My degrees are NOT in finance. But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post. But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #616780investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong. I wasted my time doing so. Will you say that you were wrong or will you try to wiggle out of it? (I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.[/quote]SK from CV brought up his CPA credentials in the context of an issue that related to accounting. He was offering up his experience as part of the reply. So, he gets a pass.
Allan from Fallbrook brought up my and SK from CV’s credentials – he did NOT bring up HIS OWN. Now that may not have been the strongest part of his argument but, again, he was referencing OTHERS.
YOU, on the other hand, offered up YOUR OWN fictional PhD’s as proof of your own Mr. Smartypantsedness, and completely out of context of the discussion at hand. It was merely thrown out there as if to say, “And neener neener neener – I’m smarter than both of you combined because of all of my fancy edumacation.”
Please tell me you see the difference.
And, since you want to keep this going, tell us what your two fictional PhD’s have to do with banking and finance, which is the topic of discussion here.[/quote]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back? My degrees are NOT in finance. But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post. But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #617324investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong. I wasted my time doing so. Will you say that you were wrong or will you try to wiggle out of it? (I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.[/quote]SK from CV brought up his CPA credentials in the context of an issue that related to accounting. He was offering up his experience as part of the reply. So, he gets a pass.
Allan from Fallbrook brought up my and SK from CV’s credentials – he did NOT bring up HIS OWN. Now that may not have been the strongest part of his argument but, again, he was referencing OTHERS.
YOU, on the other hand, offered up YOUR OWN fictional PhD’s as proof of your own Mr. Smartypantsedness, and completely out of context of the discussion at hand. It was merely thrown out there as if to say, “And neener neener neener – I’m smarter than both of you combined because of all of my fancy edumacation.”
Please tell me you see the difference.
And, since you want to keep this going, tell us what your two fictional PhD’s have to do with banking and finance, which is the topic of discussion here.[/quote]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back? My degrees are NOT in finance. But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post. But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
.October 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM #617444investorParticipant[quote=davelj][quote=investor]
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said. You made me go back and prove you wrong. I wasted my time doing so. Will you say that you were wrong or will you try to wiggle out of it? (I know that you did not give out credentials but the three of you are siblings anyway.)I thought so.[/quote]SK from CV brought up his CPA credentials in the context of an issue that related to accounting. He was offering up his experience as part of the reply. So, he gets a pass.
Allan from Fallbrook brought up my and SK from CV’s credentials – he did NOT bring up HIS OWN. Now that may not have been the strongest part of his argument but, again, he was referencing OTHERS.
YOU, on the other hand, offered up YOUR OWN fictional PhD’s as proof of your own Mr. Smartypantsedness, and completely out of context of the discussion at hand. It was merely thrown out there as if to say, “And neener neener neener – I’m smarter than both of you combined because of all of my fancy edumacation.”
Please tell me you see the difference.
And, since you want to keep this going, tell us what your two fictional PhD’s have to do with banking and finance, which is the topic of discussion here.[/quote]
SV CV gets a pass? Are you sure you guys aren’t just holding hands and kissing in the back? My degrees are NOT in finance. But, I only brought them up in response to the two entries from Allen and SV CV from the Federal Reserve post. But as Allen said in the Federal Reserve post, you do not need to have a degree in finance in order to understand the Federal Reserve. Don’t make me find that one two (Allen, SV CV, davelj, lookie, lookie he did it again!!!)I don’t want to reveal them for fear of some of you jerk-offs not respecting someone else’s privacy, not one bit
. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.