Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › griffin federal reserve
- This topic has 750 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 2 months ago by (former)FormerSanDiegan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 2:41 PM #617699October 12, 2010 at 2:44 PM #616629ucodegenParticipant
[quote investor]
Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?October 12, 2010 at 2:44 PM #616715ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?October 12, 2010 at 2:44 PM #617258ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?October 12, 2010 at 2:44 PM #617380ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?October 12, 2010 at 2:44 PM #617690ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Further, you had professionals like SK (CPA) and Davelj (banking and finance) weighing in and offering excellent insights on the subject and you’re retorting with Wiki entries and an added dollop of Griffin.
I didn’t bring up credentials first. SV from CV and Allen from Fallbrook did, as I have said.
[/quote]
Umm.. you are smoking something. You can’t claim it was offered up by davelj and SK.. it was not a ‘self-claim’, and as previously posted, it was relevant.. and not a ‘sword fight’.Here is davelj’s statement
[quote davelj]
I have NEVER brought it up out of the blue because, frankly, I think it detracts from the conversation and, as I’ve noted, I think degrees are over-rated. Consequently, it is largely irrelevant. You, on the other hand, clearly believe the opposite, which is why you brought it up in the first place.
[/quote]
so was your quote in reply about bringing up degrees addressed to davelj or to Allan from Fallbrook who actually made the statements?October 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM #616644ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Can you not read?
[/quote]
That center quote box makes it a little hard.This is also why I do it the long/hard way.
You could have just done something like
[quote davelj]
and yet you’re still posting… I think it’s great that George Soros doesn’t mind you surfing the internet during your important meetings with him.
[/quote]
George soros? boy, have you got me wrong. George Soros, in my book, is the main reason we have the socialistic trends in the federal Government right now. Not something, a die hard capitilist like me likes.October 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM #616730ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Can you not read?
[/quote]
That center quote box makes it a little hard.This is also why I do it the long/hard way.
You could have just done something like
[quote davelj]
and yet you’re still posting… I think it’s great that George Soros doesn’t mind you surfing the internet during your important meetings with him.
[/quote]
George soros? boy, have you got me wrong. George Soros, in my book, is the main reason we have the socialistic trends in the federal Government right now. Not something, a die hard capitilist like me likes.October 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM #617273ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Can you not read?
[/quote]
That center quote box makes it a little hard.This is also why I do it the long/hard way.
You could have just done something like
[quote davelj]
and yet you’re still posting… I think it’s great that George Soros doesn’t mind you surfing the internet during your important meetings with him.
[/quote]
George soros? boy, have you got me wrong. George Soros, in my book, is the main reason we have the socialistic trends in the federal Government right now. Not something, a die hard capitilist like me likes.October 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM #617395ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Can you not read?
[/quote]
That center quote box makes it a little hard.This is also why I do it the long/hard way.
You could have just done something like
[quote davelj]
and yet you’re still posting… I think it’s great that George Soros doesn’t mind you surfing the internet during your important meetings with him.
[/quote]
George soros? boy, have you got me wrong. George Soros, in my book, is the main reason we have the socialistic trends in the federal Government right now. Not something, a die hard capitilist like me likes.October 12, 2010 at 2:48 PM #617704ucodegenParticipant[quote investor]
Can you not read?
[/quote]
That center quote box makes it a little hard.This is also why I do it the long/hard way.
You could have just done something like
[quote davelj]
and yet you’re still posting… I think it’s great that George Soros doesn’t mind you surfing the internet during your important meetings with him.
[/quote]
George soros? boy, have you got me wrong. George Soros, in my book, is the main reason we have the socialistic trends in the federal Government right now. Not something, a die hard capitilist like me likes.October 12, 2010 at 2:50 PM #616649investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
priasm dick: (couldn’t resist).You have not answered my question.
[/quote]
I suspect you mean ‘priapism’??
priasm is made up, priapism is a disease of the..And you have not answered other people’s questions and are ‘debating’ using Ad-hominem attacks. Such attacks may deserve reply in kind.[/quote]
When you nick name someone, you get to name them as you please, thank you.October 12, 2010 at 2:50 PM #616735investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
priasm dick: (couldn’t resist).You have not answered my question.
[/quote]
I suspect you mean ‘priapism’??
priasm is made up, priapism is a disease of the..And you have not answered other people’s questions and are ‘debating’ using Ad-hominem attacks. Such attacks may deserve reply in kind.[/quote]
When you nick name someone, you get to name them as you please, thank you.October 12, 2010 at 2:50 PM #617278investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
priasm dick: (couldn’t resist).You have not answered my question.
[/quote]
I suspect you mean ‘priapism’??
priasm is made up, priapism is a disease of the..And you have not answered other people’s questions and are ‘debating’ using Ad-hominem attacks. Such attacks may deserve reply in kind.[/quote]
When you nick name someone, you get to name them as you please, thank you.October 12, 2010 at 2:50 PM #617400investorParticipant[quote=ucodegen][quote investor]
priasm dick: (couldn’t resist).You have not answered my question.
[/quote]
I suspect you mean ‘priapism’??
priasm is made up, priapism is a disease of the..And you have not answered other people’s questions and are ‘debating’ using Ad-hominem attacks. Such attacks may deserve reply in kind.[/quote]
When you nick name someone, you get to name them as you please, thank you. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.