- This topic has 20 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by NeetaT.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2007 at 5:04 PM #11199December 13, 2007 at 5:10 PM #116397(former)FormerSanDieganParticipant
Well … at least it’s a better investment now than it was two years ago.
December 13, 2007 at 5:10 PM #116529(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantWell … at least it’s a better investment now than it was two years ago.
December 13, 2007 at 5:10 PM #116562(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantWell … at least it’s a better investment now than it was two years ago.
December 13, 2007 at 5:10 PM #116603(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantWell … at least it’s a better investment now than it was two years ago.
December 13, 2007 at 5:10 PM #116618(former)FormerSanDieganParticipantWell … at least it’s a better investment now than it was two years ago.
December 13, 2007 at 5:15 PM #116402AnonymousGuestIt sold for $434k. Assuming 100% financing, how could it be a short sale for $499k? If the owners borrowed extra equity, I can understand, but it’s still not a short sale in my opinion.
December 13, 2007 at 5:15 PM #116534AnonymousGuestIt sold for $434k. Assuming 100% financing, how could it be a short sale for $499k? If the owners borrowed extra equity, I can understand, but it’s still not a short sale in my opinion.
December 13, 2007 at 5:15 PM #116567AnonymousGuestIt sold for $434k. Assuming 100% financing, how could it be a short sale for $499k? If the owners borrowed extra equity, I can understand, but it’s still not a short sale in my opinion.
December 13, 2007 at 5:15 PM #116610AnonymousGuestIt sold for $434k. Assuming 100% financing, how could it be a short sale for $499k? If the owners borrowed extra equity, I can understand, but it’s still not a short sale in my opinion.
December 13, 2007 at 5:15 PM #116623AnonymousGuestIt sold for $434k. Assuming 100% financing, how could it be a short sale for $499k? If the owners borrowed extra equity, I can understand, but it’s still not a short sale in my opinion.
December 13, 2007 at 6:51 PM #116463NavydocParticipantActually, this doesn’t sound that bad. What would this place rent for? $2500/month maybe? With enough down I would think this place could pencil out ok. I may have a skewed idea of rents living up here in LA though. Would like to hear what some of the RE professionals on this board think of this one.
(By the way GunDoctor, would you happen to be a Gunsmith? I was one of those myself once before I became a people doctor)
December 13, 2007 at 6:51 PM #116593NavydocParticipantActually, this doesn’t sound that bad. What would this place rent for? $2500/month maybe? With enough down I would think this place could pencil out ok. I may have a skewed idea of rents living up here in LA though. Would like to hear what some of the RE professionals on this board think of this one.
(By the way GunDoctor, would you happen to be a Gunsmith? I was one of those myself once before I became a people doctor)
December 13, 2007 at 6:51 PM #116627NavydocParticipantActually, this doesn’t sound that bad. What would this place rent for? $2500/month maybe? With enough down I would think this place could pencil out ok. I may have a skewed idea of rents living up here in LA though. Would like to hear what some of the RE professionals on this board think of this one.
(By the way GunDoctor, would you happen to be a Gunsmith? I was one of those myself once before I became a people doctor)
December 13, 2007 at 6:51 PM #116669NavydocParticipantActually, this doesn’t sound that bad. What would this place rent for? $2500/month maybe? With enough down I would think this place could pencil out ok. I may have a skewed idea of rents living up here in LA though. Would like to hear what some of the RE professionals on this board think of this one.
(By the way GunDoctor, would you happen to be a Gunsmith? I was one of those myself once before I became a people doctor)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.