- This topic has 360 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by OwnerOfCalifornia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 19, 2009 at 6:34 AM #15910June 19, 2009 at 8:49 AM #417343CoronitaParticipant
One thing. The way it is crafted, you cannot simply go buy a clunker right now and use it to get the credit. Car has to be registered in your name for I think 120days…. which I think if you bought a clunker today, 120 days would put you after when this bill would end i think.
BUT, you aren’t obligated to buy a GM/Ford/Chrysler, so it’s not exactly a UAW bailout per se.
What it is a bailout for though is for folks that have those gas guzzler truck/suvs in recent times versus fuel efficient cars….
Oh hell, a $4500 tax credit for any new car purchase would have been fine with me. Call it a bill to stimulate the auto industry.
June 19, 2009 at 8:49 AM #417578CoronitaParticipantOne thing. The way it is crafted, you cannot simply go buy a clunker right now and use it to get the credit. Car has to be registered in your name for I think 120days…. which I think if you bought a clunker today, 120 days would put you after when this bill would end i think.
BUT, you aren’t obligated to buy a GM/Ford/Chrysler, so it’s not exactly a UAW bailout per se.
What it is a bailout for though is for folks that have those gas guzzler truck/suvs in recent times versus fuel efficient cars….
Oh hell, a $4500 tax credit for any new car purchase would have been fine with me. Call it a bill to stimulate the auto industry.
June 19, 2009 at 8:49 AM #417844CoronitaParticipantOne thing. The way it is crafted, you cannot simply go buy a clunker right now and use it to get the credit. Car has to be registered in your name for I think 120days…. which I think if you bought a clunker today, 120 days would put you after when this bill would end i think.
BUT, you aren’t obligated to buy a GM/Ford/Chrysler, so it’s not exactly a UAW bailout per se.
What it is a bailout for though is for folks that have those gas guzzler truck/suvs in recent times versus fuel efficient cars….
Oh hell, a $4500 tax credit for any new car purchase would have been fine with me. Call it a bill to stimulate the auto industry.
June 19, 2009 at 8:49 AM #417907CoronitaParticipantOne thing. The way it is crafted, you cannot simply go buy a clunker right now and use it to get the credit. Car has to be registered in your name for I think 120days…. which I think if you bought a clunker today, 120 days would put you after when this bill would end i think.
BUT, you aren’t obligated to buy a GM/Ford/Chrysler, so it’s not exactly a UAW bailout per se.
What it is a bailout for though is for folks that have those gas guzzler truck/suvs in recent times versus fuel efficient cars….
Oh hell, a $4500 tax credit for any new car purchase would have been fine with me. Call it a bill to stimulate the auto industry.
June 19, 2009 at 8:49 AM #418068CoronitaParticipantOne thing. The way it is crafted, you cannot simply go buy a clunker right now and use it to get the credit. Car has to be registered in your name for I think 120days…. which I think if you bought a clunker today, 120 days would put you after when this bill would end i think.
BUT, you aren’t obligated to buy a GM/Ford/Chrysler, so it’s not exactly a UAW bailout per se.
What it is a bailout for though is for folks that have those gas guzzler truck/suvs in recent times versus fuel efficient cars….
Oh hell, a $4500 tax credit for any new car purchase would have been fine with me. Call it a bill to stimulate the auto industry.
June 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #417373PadreBrianParticipantThey should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans.
June 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #417608PadreBrianParticipantThey should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans.
June 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #417874PadreBrianParticipantThey should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans.
June 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #417937PadreBrianParticipantThey should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans.
June 19, 2009 at 9:22 AM #418097PadreBrianParticipantThey should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans.
June 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM #417383ibjamesParticipant[quote=PadreBrian]They should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans. [/quote]
Why would they do that!? That would make sense?!?
June 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM #417618ibjamesParticipant[quote=PadreBrian]They should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans. [/quote]
Why would they do that!? That would make sense?!?
June 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM #417884ibjamesParticipant[quote=PadreBrian]They should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans. [/quote]
Why would they do that!? That would make sense?!?
June 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM #417947ibjamesParticipant[quote=PadreBrian]They should have tried this BEFORE giving them loans. [/quote]
Why would they do that!? That would make sense?!?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.