- This topic has 25 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
UCGal.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 4, 2010 at 11:16 PM #18253December 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM #635612
jpinpb
Participant3136 Poe is only $/Sq. Ft.: $248. Nothing has sold in that area for that low a price in the last 2 years. It’s a pretty good deal and still Point Loma. It’s lower than the median/average for that area. Considering they were asking $1,195,000 in June, I think it’s a pretty good deal for 600k and quite a slash in price.
The one in Scaremont is still priced decent, considering 4751 Lake Forest sold for 572k in September.
But the ole adage, buy the worst house in the best neighborhood applies. At least PL is better than Clairemont, even though some pockets are not considered ideal. It does seem strange to see McMansions replacing some of these older homes.
The one in Clairemont is really out of place for the area. I think 3552 Ottawa is another example.
Beds: 4
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,305
$/Sq. Ft.: $200
The one on Ottawa really is not the best part of Clairemont, IMO.December 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM #635688jpinpb
Participant3136 Poe is only $/Sq. Ft.: $248. Nothing has sold in that area for that low a price in the last 2 years. It’s a pretty good deal and still Point Loma. It’s lower than the median/average for that area. Considering they were asking $1,195,000 in June, I think it’s a pretty good deal for 600k and quite a slash in price.
The one in Scaremont is still priced decent, considering 4751 Lake Forest sold for 572k in September.
But the ole adage, buy the worst house in the best neighborhood applies. At least PL is better than Clairemont, even though some pockets are not considered ideal. It does seem strange to see McMansions replacing some of these older homes.
The one in Clairemont is really out of place for the area. I think 3552 Ottawa is another example.
Beds: 4
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,305
$/Sq. Ft.: $200
The one on Ottawa really is not the best part of Clairemont, IMO.December 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM #636714jpinpb
Participant3136 Poe is only $/Sq. Ft.: $248. Nothing has sold in that area for that low a price in the last 2 years. It’s a pretty good deal and still Point Loma. It’s lower than the median/average for that area. Considering they were asking $1,195,000 in June, I think it’s a pretty good deal for 600k and quite a slash in price.
The one in Scaremont is still priced decent, considering 4751 Lake Forest sold for 572k in September.
But the ole adage, buy the worst house in the best neighborhood applies. At least PL is better than Clairemont, even though some pockets are not considered ideal. It does seem strange to see McMansions replacing some of these older homes.
The one in Clairemont is really out of place for the area. I think 3552 Ottawa is another example.
Beds: 4
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,305
$/Sq. Ft.: $200
The one on Ottawa really is not the best part of Clairemont, IMO.December 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM #636398jpinpb
Participant3136 Poe is only $/Sq. Ft.: $248. Nothing has sold in that area for that low a price in the last 2 years. It’s a pretty good deal and still Point Loma. It’s lower than the median/average for that area. Considering they were asking $1,195,000 in June, I think it’s a pretty good deal for 600k and quite a slash in price.
The one in Scaremont is still priced decent, considering 4751 Lake Forest sold for 572k in September.
But the ole adage, buy the worst house in the best neighborhood applies. At least PL is better than Clairemont, even though some pockets are not considered ideal. It does seem strange to see McMansions replacing some of these older homes.
The one in Clairemont is really out of place for the area. I think 3552 Ottawa is another example.
Beds: 4
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,305
$/Sq. Ft.: $200
The one on Ottawa really is not the best part of Clairemont, IMO.December 5, 2010 at 10:42 AM #636265jpinpb
Participant3136 Poe is only $/Sq. Ft.: $248. Nothing has sold in that area for that low a price in the last 2 years. It’s a pretty good deal and still Point Loma. It’s lower than the median/average for that area. Considering they were asking $1,195,000 in June, I think it’s a pretty good deal for 600k and quite a slash in price.
The one in Scaremont is still priced decent, considering 4751 Lake Forest sold for 572k in September.
But the ole adage, buy the worst house in the best neighborhood applies. At least PL is better than Clairemont, even though some pockets are not considered ideal. It does seem strange to see McMansions replacing some of these older homes.
The one in Clairemont is really out of place for the area. I think 3552 Ottawa is another example.
Beds: 4
Baths: 4
Sq. Ft.: 3,305
$/Sq. Ft.: $200
The one on Ottawa really is not the best part of Clairemont, IMO.December 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM #635622jpinpb
ParticipantI just realized they delisted the 600k price on Poe and now the LP is 895k. Strange.
December 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM #636724jpinpb
ParticipantI just realized they delisted the 600k price on Poe and now the LP is 895k. Strange.
December 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM #635698jpinpb
ParticipantI just realized they delisted the 600k price on Poe and now the LP is 895k. Strange.
December 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM #636408jpinpb
ParticipantI just realized they delisted the 600k price on Poe and now the LP is 895k. Strange.
December 5, 2010 at 10:56 AM #636275jpinpb
ParticipantI just realized they delisted the 600k price on Poe and now the LP is 895k. Strange.
December 5, 2010 at 1:52 PM #636310NotCranky
ParticipantI think it is fine to overbuild if you plan on staying there a very long time and/or can do it cheaply.
OTH, I see huge new houses , complete with gilded back yard entertainment areas, right on top of busy high speed streets, or up on the hills over freeways and I can’t imagine why those resources and locations match up. Each to his own I guess.
December 5, 2010 at 1:52 PM #636759NotCranky
ParticipantI think it is fine to overbuild if you plan on staying there a very long time and/or can do it cheaply.
OTH, I see huge new houses , complete with gilded back yard entertainment areas, right on top of busy high speed streets, or up on the hills over freeways and I can’t imagine why those resources and locations match up. Each to his own I guess.
December 5, 2010 at 1:52 PM #636443NotCranky
ParticipantI think it is fine to overbuild if you plan on staying there a very long time and/or can do it cheaply.
OTH, I see huge new houses , complete with gilded back yard entertainment areas, right on top of busy high speed streets, or up on the hills over freeways and I can’t imagine why those resources and locations match up. Each to his own I guess.
December 5, 2010 at 1:52 PM #635733NotCranky
ParticipantI think it is fine to overbuild if you plan on staying there a very long time and/or can do it cheaply.
OTH, I see huge new houses , complete with gilded back yard entertainment areas, right on top of busy high speed streets, or up on the hills over freeways and I can’t imagine why those resources and locations match up. Each to his own I guess.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.