- This topic has 770 replies, 41 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by rubbieslippers.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2008 at 9:37 PM #205599May 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM #205479equalizerParticipant
Guess what Rush and friends are saying tonight(in private):
We are so happy that gays are so selfish that they (corrected) will destroy the dem party and give hope to McCain. Many cons dont like McCain, but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.Just when dems are gloating, they are being outfoxed and will get humiliated once again in Nov. Note that most foriengners, esp Asians hate gay lifestyle and will swing to McCain(its not a choice).
So question for the dems: Do you care about gays or your party more? As Sandi stated, its just cultural. If you cared in the least about your party (and supposedly our country) you would denounce this ruling and tell gays to fight for civil unions (listen to Marion and tell them to just STFU and go home). Luckily, dems dont care about winning so I will accept your concession today.
I will close with this liberal quote: “Selfish people should not be in power.”
May 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM #205530equalizerParticipantGuess what Rush and friends are saying tonight(in private):
We are so happy that gays are so selfish that they (corrected) will destroy the dem party and give hope to McCain. Many cons dont like McCain, but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.Just when dems are gloating, they are being outfoxed and will get humiliated once again in Nov. Note that most foriengners, esp Asians hate gay lifestyle and will swing to McCain(its not a choice).
So question for the dems: Do you care about gays or your party more? As Sandi stated, its just cultural. If you cared in the least about your party (and supposedly our country) you would denounce this ruling and tell gays to fight for civil unions (listen to Marion and tell them to just STFU and go home). Luckily, dems dont care about winning so I will accept your concession today.
I will close with this liberal quote: “Selfish people should not be in power.”
May 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM #205560equalizerParticipantGuess what Rush and friends are saying tonight(in private):
We are so happy that gays are so selfish that they (corrected) will destroy the dem party and give hope to McCain. Many cons dont like McCain, but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.Just when dems are gloating, they are being outfoxed and will get humiliated once again in Nov. Note that most foriengners, esp Asians hate gay lifestyle and will swing to McCain(its not a choice).
So question for the dems: Do you care about gays or your party more? As Sandi stated, its just cultural. If you cared in the least about your party (and supposedly our country) you would denounce this ruling and tell gays to fight for civil unions (listen to Marion and tell them to just STFU and go home). Luckily, dems dont care about winning so I will accept your concession today.
I will close with this liberal quote: “Selfish people should not be in power.”
May 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM #205582equalizerParticipantGuess what Rush and friends are saying tonight(in private):
We are so happy that gays are so selfish that they (corrected) will destroy the dem party and give hope to McCain. Many cons dont like McCain, but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.Just when dems are gloating, they are being outfoxed and will get humiliated once again in Nov. Note that most foriengners, esp Asians hate gay lifestyle and will swing to McCain(its not a choice).
So question for the dems: Do you care about gays or your party more? As Sandi stated, its just cultural. If you cared in the least about your party (and supposedly our country) you would denounce this ruling and tell gays to fight for civil unions (listen to Marion and tell them to just STFU and go home). Luckily, dems dont care about winning so I will accept your concession today.
I will close with this liberal quote: “Selfish people should not be in power.”
May 15, 2008 at 9:50 PM #205616equalizerParticipantGuess what Rush and friends are saying tonight(in private):
We are so happy that gays are so selfish that they (corrected) will destroy the dem party and give hope to McCain. Many cons dont like McCain, but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.Just when dems are gloating, they are being outfoxed and will get humiliated once again in Nov. Note that most foriengners, esp Asians hate gay lifestyle and will swing to McCain(its not a choice).
So question for the dems: Do you care about gays or your party more? As Sandi stated, its just cultural. If you cared in the least about your party (and supposedly our country) you would denounce this ruling and tell gays to fight for civil unions (listen to Marion and tell them to just STFU and go home). Luckily, dems dont care about winning so I will accept your concession today.
I will close with this liberal quote: “Selfish people should not be in power.”
May 15, 2008 at 10:02 PM #205513rubbieslippersParticipant“but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.’
I already said this. I know it will cause REPUBLICANS to come out in full force and defeat it. It may put Mc Cain in the white house. IT WILL NOT PASS. I agree.
Where were you in Desert Storm? Where were you during Iraqi Freedom? My husband was there, and agrees 100% with me that is why he is leaving the military after 22 years of service in the middle of a depression. Our country is a joke with that president, and he believes as do, that they are ruining this country!
I am proud to be born in this country. My forefathers faught in the revolutionary, the civil war, world wars etc!
I am proud to be the wife of a man like that. I serve my country to EVERYDAY he goes to work I sacrifice for my country too! He didn’t have to reinlist, I could have objected to him putting his life in harms way. He wants to see our grandchildren together. He chose to serve his country NOT A WAR FOR OIL!HOW DARE YOU QUESTION OUR PATRIOTISM!!!!!!!
May 15, 2008 at 10:02 PM #205563rubbieslippersParticipant“but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.’
I already said this. I know it will cause REPUBLICANS to come out in full force and defeat it. It may put Mc Cain in the white house. IT WILL NOT PASS. I agree.
Where were you in Desert Storm? Where were you during Iraqi Freedom? My husband was there, and agrees 100% with me that is why he is leaving the military after 22 years of service in the middle of a depression. Our country is a joke with that president, and he believes as do, that they are ruining this country!
I am proud to be born in this country. My forefathers faught in the revolutionary, the civil war, world wars etc!
I am proud to be the wife of a man like that. I serve my country to EVERYDAY he goes to work I sacrifice for my country too! He didn’t have to reinlist, I could have objected to him putting his life in harms way. He wants to see our grandchildren together. He chose to serve his country NOT A WAR FOR OIL!HOW DARE YOU QUESTION OUR PATRIOTISM!!!!!!!
May 15, 2008 at 10:02 PM #205593rubbieslippersParticipant“but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.’
I already said this. I know it will cause REPUBLICANS to come out in full force and defeat it. It may put Mc Cain in the white house. IT WILL NOT PASS. I agree.
Where were you in Desert Storm? Where were you during Iraqi Freedom? My husband was there, and agrees 100% with me that is why he is leaving the military after 22 years of service in the middle of a depression. Our country is a joke with that president, and he believes as do, that they are ruining this country!
I am proud to be born in this country. My forefathers faught in the revolutionary, the civil war, world wars etc!
I am proud to be the wife of a man like that. I serve my country to EVERYDAY he goes to work I sacrifice for my country too! He didn’t have to reinlist, I could have objected to him putting his life in harms way. He wants to see our grandchildren together. He chose to serve his country NOT A WAR FOR OIL!HOW DARE YOU QUESTION OUR PATRIOTISM!!!!!!!
May 15, 2008 at 10:02 PM #205617rubbieslippersParticipant“but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.’
I already said this. I know it will cause REPUBLICANS to come out in full force and defeat it. It may put Mc Cain in the white house. IT WILL NOT PASS. I agree.
Where were you in Desert Storm? Where were you during Iraqi Freedom? My husband was there, and agrees 100% with me that is why he is leaving the military after 22 years of service in the middle of a depression. Our country is a joke with that president, and he believes as do, that they are ruining this country!
I am proud to be born in this country. My forefathers faught in the revolutionary, the civil war, world wars etc!
I am proud to be the wife of a man like that. I serve my country to EVERYDAY he goes to work I sacrifice for my country too! He didn’t have to reinlist, I could have objected to him putting his life in harms way. He wants to see our grandchildren together. He chose to serve his country NOT A WAR FOR OIL!HOW DARE YOU QUESTION OUR PATRIOTISM!!!!!!!
May 15, 2008 at 10:02 PM #205648rubbieslippersParticipant“but they really hate gay lifestyle and this ruling will bring them all out.’
I already said this. I know it will cause REPUBLICANS to come out in full force and defeat it. It may put Mc Cain in the white house. IT WILL NOT PASS. I agree.
Where were you in Desert Storm? Where were you during Iraqi Freedom? My husband was there, and agrees 100% with me that is why he is leaving the military after 22 years of service in the middle of a depression. Our country is a joke with that president, and he believes as do, that they are ruining this country!
I am proud to be born in this country. My forefathers faught in the revolutionary, the civil war, world wars etc!
I am proud to be the wife of a man like that. I serve my country to EVERYDAY he goes to work I sacrifice for my country too! He didn’t have to reinlist, I could have objected to him putting his life in harms way. He wants to see our grandchildren together. He chose to serve his country NOT A WAR FOR OIL!HOW DARE YOU QUESTION OUR PATRIOTISM!!!!!!!
May 15, 2008 at 10:40 PM #205538CoronitaParticipantThread Hijack. A few of us are getting a wee bit heated over this topic. So I have one sort of philosophical question for some folks.
As a society, if we start recognizing gay men and women more and more, shouldn't we be redefining they way we segregate shower rooms in gyms? Instead of the strict "Men's Shower Room" and "Women's Shower Room", shouldn't we redefine this to be "Straight Women's +Gay Men's Shower Room" and "Straight Men's + Gay Women's Shower Room"?
I mean, it's not socially acceptable for a man to be checking out a woman taking a shower in a gym. What makes it acceptable that a gay man is checking out a straight man in the same shower? And if we don't solve this problem, why bother have separate shower rooms anyway?
Of course, you can have the situation that a straight man pretends to be gay for the sake of using the straight woman's shower room, but that's a separate thing.
—-
On topic.
1) I think marriage is church arrangement between a man and a woman. It would sadden me to have this redefined because i believe the meaning of it from a religious perspective was between man/woman. That said though….
2) The fed/state/local gov should recognize a "couple" regardless of sexual orientation, and extend the same protections and rights under the law.
One of the issues with "domestic partnership" you don't get the same rights as being "married", and this isn't just about taxes. This also applies to trusts and survivorship. Think about it. Medical insurance: some plans don't recognize domestic partnerships. Inheritance laws don't always recognize domestic partnerships, etc,etc,etc.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 15, 2008 at 10:40 PM #205591CoronitaParticipantThread Hijack. A few of us are getting a wee bit heated over this topic. So I have one sort of philosophical question for some folks.
As a society, if we start recognizing gay men and women more and more, shouldn't we be redefining they way we segregate shower rooms in gyms? Instead of the strict "Men's Shower Room" and "Women's Shower Room", shouldn't we redefine this to be "Straight Women's +Gay Men's Shower Room" and "Straight Men's + Gay Women's Shower Room"?
I mean, it's not socially acceptable for a man to be checking out a woman taking a shower in a gym. What makes it acceptable that a gay man is checking out a straight man in the same shower? And if we don't solve this problem, why bother have separate shower rooms anyway?
Of course, you can have the situation that a straight man pretends to be gay for the sake of using the straight woman's shower room, but that's a separate thing.
—-
On topic.
1) I think marriage is church arrangement between a man and a woman. It would sadden me to have this redefined because i believe the meaning of it from a religious perspective was between man/woman. That said though….
2) The fed/state/local gov should recognize a "couple" regardless of sexual orientation, and extend the same protections and rights under the law.
One of the issues with "domestic partnership" you don't get the same rights as being "married", and this isn't just about taxes. This also applies to trusts and survivorship. Think about it. Medical insurance: some plans don't recognize domestic partnerships. Inheritance laws don't always recognize domestic partnerships, etc,etc,etc.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 15, 2008 at 10:40 PM #205618CoronitaParticipantThread Hijack. A few of us are getting a wee bit heated over this topic. So I have one sort of philosophical question for some folks.
As a society, if we start recognizing gay men and women more and more, shouldn't we be redefining they way we segregate shower rooms in gyms? Instead of the strict "Men's Shower Room" and "Women's Shower Room", shouldn't we redefine this to be "Straight Women's +Gay Men's Shower Room" and "Straight Men's + Gay Women's Shower Room"?
I mean, it's not socially acceptable for a man to be checking out a woman taking a shower in a gym. What makes it acceptable that a gay man is checking out a straight man in the same shower? And if we don't solve this problem, why bother have separate shower rooms anyway?
Of course, you can have the situation that a straight man pretends to be gay for the sake of using the straight woman's shower room, but that's a separate thing.
—-
On topic.
1) I think marriage is church arrangement between a man and a woman. It would sadden me to have this redefined because i believe the meaning of it from a religious perspective was between man/woman. That said though….
2) The fed/state/local gov should recognize a "couple" regardless of sexual orientation, and extend the same protections and rights under the law.
One of the issues with "domestic partnership" you don't get the same rights as being "married", and this isn't just about taxes. This also applies to trusts and survivorship. Think about it. Medical insurance: some plans don't recognize domestic partnerships. Inheritance laws don't always recognize domestic partnerships, etc,etc,etc.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
May 15, 2008 at 10:40 PM #205642CoronitaParticipantThread Hijack. A few of us are getting a wee bit heated over this topic. So I have one sort of philosophical question for some folks.
As a society, if we start recognizing gay men and women more and more, shouldn't we be redefining they way we segregate shower rooms in gyms? Instead of the strict "Men's Shower Room" and "Women's Shower Room", shouldn't we redefine this to be "Straight Women's +Gay Men's Shower Room" and "Straight Men's + Gay Women's Shower Room"?
I mean, it's not socially acceptable for a man to be checking out a woman taking a shower in a gym. What makes it acceptable that a gay man is checking out a straight man in the same shower? And if we don't solve this problem, why bother have separate shower rooms anyway?
Of course, you can have the situation that a straight man pretends to be gay for the sake of using the straight woman's shower room, but that's a separate thing.
—-
On topic.
1) I think marriage is church arrangement between a man and a woman. It would sadden me to have this redefined because i believe the meaning of it from a religious perspective was between man/woman. That said though….
2) The fed/state/local gov should recognize a "couple" regardless of sexual orientation, and extend the same protections and rights under the law.
One of the issues with "domestic partnership" you don't get the same rights as being "married", and this isn't just about taxes. This also applies to trusts and survivorship. Think about it. Medical insurance: some plans don't recognize domestic partnerships. Inheritance laws don't always recognize domestic partnerships, etc,etc,etc.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.