Gay Marriage Ruling

[equalizer]

Marion,

Did you hear about this case, “Woman indicted in Missouri MySpace suicide case”? The girl was obviously affected by computer harrassment, so you can imagine school harrassment.
BTW, the charges in the case are so draconian but they will probably stand up because judges are elected and will not make any rules that would not anger the family and Fox.

Lesson for all Piggs: Be real careful, you are a few keystrokes away from breaking federal laws.

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gg5xCtQtLBF6vJqWXStItGEOsJfwD90MEME01

[zk]

Submitted by marion on May 15, 2008 – 7:08pm.
I think this is a fair and reasonable compromise for our society.

Maybe the government thinks if it agrees to gay marriage, then it means they are condoning the lifestyle. What you guys have to realize is this nation was founded on Christianity. Our pledge of allegiance says, “In God we trust”.

1. Our nation was not founded on christianity. It was founded on freedom of religion.
2. Our pledge of allegiance does not say “in god we trust.”

The pledge of allegiance does say “under god.” But a) it wasn’t even written until a hundred and twenty years after this country was founded and b) it doesn’t say “under the christian god.

[zk]

Submitted by marion on May 15, 2008 – 7:08pm.
I think this is a fair and reasonable compromise for our society.

Maybe the government thinks if it agrees to gay marriage, then it means they are condoning the lifestyle. What you guys have to realize is this nation was founded on Christianity. Our pledge of allegiance says, “In God we trust”.

1. Our nation was not founded on christianity. It was founded on freedom of religion.
2. Our pledge of allegiance does not say “in god we trust.”

The pledge of allegiance does say “under god.” But a) it wasn’t even written until a hundred and twenty years after this country was founded and b) it doesn’t say “under the christian god.

[zk]

Submitted by marion on May 15, 2008 – 7:08pm.
I think this is a fair and reasonable compromise for our society.

Maybe the government thinks if it agrees to gay marriage, then it means they are condoning the lifestyle. What you guys have to realize is this nation was founded on Christianity. Our pledge of allegiance says, “In God we trust”.

1. Our nation was not founded on christianity. It was founded on freedom of religion.
2. Our pledge of allegiance does not say “in god we trust.”

The pledge of allegiance does say “under god.” But a) it wasn’t even written until a hundred and twenty years after this country was founded and b) it doesn’t say “under the christian god.

[zk]

Submitted by marion on May 15, 2008 – 7:08pm.
I think this is a fair and reasonable compromise for our society.

Maybe the government thinks if it agrees to gay marriage, then it means they are condoning the lifestyle. What you guys have to realize is this nation was founded on Christianity. Our pledge of allegiance says, “In God we trust”.

1. Our nation was not founded on christianity. It was founded on freedom of religion.
2. Our pledge of allegiance does not say “in god we trust.”

The pledge of allegiance does say “under god.” But a) it wasn’t even written until a hundred and twenty years after this country was founded and b) it doesn’t say “under the christian god.

[zk]

Submitted by marion on May 15, 2008 – 7:08pm.
I think this is a fair and reasonable compromise for our society.

Maybe the government thinks if it agrees to gay marriage, then it means they are condoning the lifestyle. What you guys have to realize is this nation was founded on Christianity. Our pledge of allegiance says, “In God we trust”.

1. Our nation was not founded on christianity. It was founded on freedom of religion.
2. Our pledge of allegiance does not say “in god we trust.”

The pledge of allegiance does say “under god.” But a) it wasn’t even written until a hundred and twenty years after this country was founded and b) it doesn’t say “under the christian god.

[meadandale]

@zk

Notice how in virtually every post you insult the people on the other side of the issue?

Very classy…I’m done with this topic and you since clearly everyone that doesn’t agree with you is an idiot and frankly, what can an idiot offer to the discussion?

[meadandale]

@zk

Notice how in virtually every post you insult the people on the other side of the issue?

Very classy…I’m done with this topic and you since clearly everyone that doesn’t agree with you is an idiot and frankly, what can an idiot offer to the discussion?

[meadandale]

@zk

Notice how in virtually every post you insult the people on the other side of the issue?

Very classy…I’m done with this topic and you since clearly everyone that doesn’t agree with you is an idiot and frankly, what can an idiot offer to the discussion?

[meadandale]

@zk

Notice how in virtually every post you insult the people on the other side of the issue?

Very classy…I’m done with this topic and you since clearly everyone that doesn’t agree with you is an idiot and frankly, what can an idiot offer to the discussion?

[meadandale]

@zk

Notice how in virtually every post you insult the people on the other side of the issue?

Very classy…I’m done with this topic and you since clearly everyone that doesn’t agree with you is an idiot and frankly, what can an idiot offer to the discussion?

[equalizer]

Sdude,

You make good points on 5 reason for marriage, #6 There are legal issues such as living wills(?), etc, but most of them are covered by civil unions.

[equalizer]

Sdude,

You make good points on 5 reason for marriage, #6 There are legal issues such as living wills(?), etc, but most of them are covered by civil unions.

[equalizer]

Sdude,

You make good points on 5 reason for marriage, #6 There are legal issues such as living wills(?), etc, but most of them are covered by civil unions.

[equalizer]

Sdude,

You make good points on 5 reason for marriage, #6 There are legal issues such as living wills(?), etc, but most of them are covered by civil unions.

[Author]

Posts