Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Funky Transaction
- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 23, 2011 at 12:47 PM #681160March 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM #680010urbanrealtorParticipant
[quote=bearishgurl][quote=urbanrealtor]. . . I am curious how they got the place for $480k to begin with.
That seems really low.
That is the only part that seems funky to me here.[/quote]
UR, did you consider that the transaction could have been among relatives? As you know, “name” doesn’t mean anything. I haven’t seen the inside but the most recent sellers may have also replaced all the dryrotted walls, roof, cabinets, etc. IOW, they purchased it as a “moderate or heavy fixer.”[/quote]
Yeah what we have here is a bit of an information set (in several dimensions). Either way, non-verifiable pseudo-market factors.
March 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM #680064urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=urbanrealtor]. . . I am curious how they got the place for $480k to begin with.
That seems really low.
That is the only part that seems funky to me here.[/quote]
UR, did you consider that the transaction could have been among relatives? As you know, “name” doesn’t mean anything. I haven’t seen the inside but the most recent sellers may have also replaced all the dryrotted walls, roof, cabinets, etc. IOW, they purchased it as a “moderate or heavy fixer.”[/quote]
Yeah what we have here is a bit of an information set (in several dimensions). Either way, non-verifiable pseudo-market factors.
March 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM #680679urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=urbanrealtor]. . . I am curious how they got the place for $480k to begin with.
That seems really low.
That is the only part that seems funky to me here.[/quote]
UR, did you consider that the transaction could have been among relatives? As you know, “name” doesn’t mean anything. I haven’t seen the inside but the most recent sellers may have also replaced all the dryrotted walls, roof, cabinets, etc. IOW, they purchased it as a “moderate or heavy fixer.”[/quote]
Yeah what we have here is a bit of an information set (in several dimensions). Either way, non-verifiable pseudo-market factors.
March 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM #680817urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=urbanrealtor]. . . I am curious how they got the place for $480k to begin with.
That seems really low.
That is the only part that seems funky to me here.[/quote]
UR, did you consider that the transaction could have been among relatives? As you know, “name” doesn’t mean anything. I haven’t seen the inside but the most recent sellers may have also replaced all the dryrotted walls, roof, cabinets, etc. IOW, they purchased it as a “moderate or heavy fixer.”[/quote]
Yeah what we have here is a bit of an information set (in several dimensions). Either way, non-verifiable pseudo-market factors.
March 23, 2011 at 12:56 PM #681170urbanrealtorParticipant[quote=bearishgurl][quote=urbanrealtor]. . . I am curious how they got the place for $480k to begin with.
That seems really low.
That is the only part that seems funky to me here.[/quote]
UR, did you consider that the transaction could have been among relatives? As you know, “name” doesn’t mean anything. I haven’t seen the inside but the most recent sellers may have also replaced all the dryrotted walls, roof, cabinets, etc. IOW, they purchased it as a “moderate or heavy fixer.”[/quote]
Yeah what we have here is a bit of an information set (in several dimensions). Either way, non-verifiable pseudo-market factors.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.