- This topic has 290 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 5 months ago by peterb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM #395004May 7, 2009 at 9:39 AM #394344ArrayaParticipant
la times:
on Thursday that found that nearly 12% of U.S. homeowners were in arrears on their loans or in foreclosure. The numbers were even worse in battered states such as California, where 13% of homeowners were behind on their payments, and Florida, where 20% were late.<----That will keep rising. It was the highest level of distress ever recorded by the trade group, whose numbers go back to 1972. <---That means no historical precedence. The Obama administration’s plan to stave off foreclosures could fall flat in California, where nearly one-third of mortgage holders are underwater on their loans — many of them by amounts that would disqualify them for government-sponsored refinancing.
The problem is likely to be especially acute in areas like the Inland Empire, where homes have lost more than 40% of their value in the last year and nearly half the homeowners owe more on their loans than the properties are worth.
Real Estate is no longer local when you have numbers like these.
May 7, 2009 at 9:39 AM #394601ArrayaParticipantla times:
on Thursday that found that nearly 12% of U.S. homeowners were in arrears on their loans or in foreclosure. The numbers were even worse in battered states such as California, where 13% of homeowners were behind on their payments, and Florida, where 20% were late.<----That will keep rising. It was the highest level of distress ever recorded by the trade group, whose numbers go back to 1972. <---That means no historical precedence. The Obama administration’s plan to stave off foreclosures could fall flat in California, where nearly one-third of mortgage holders are underwater on their loans — many of them by amounts that would disqualify them for government-sponsored refinancing.
The problem is likely to be especially acute in areas like the Inland Empire, where homes have lost more than 40% of their value in the last year and nearly half the homeowners owe more on their loans than the properties are worth.
Real Estate is no longer local when you have numbers like these.
May 7, 2009 at 9:39 AM #394818ArrayaParticipantla times:
on Thursday that found that nearly 12% of U.S. homeowners were in arrears on their loans or in foreclosure. The numbers were even worse in battered states such as California, where 13% of homeowners were behind on their payments, and Florida, where 20% were late.<----That will keep rising. It was the highest level of distress ever recorded by the trade group, whose numbers go back to 1972. <---That means no historical precedence. The Obama administration’s plan to stave off foreclosures could fall flat in California, where nearly one-third of mortgage holders are underwater on their loans — many of them by amounts that would disqualify them for government-sponsored refinancing.
The problem is likely to be especially acute in areas like the Inland Empire, where homes have lost more than 40% of their value in the last year and nearly half the homeowners owe more on their loans than the properties are worth.
Real Estate is no longer local when you have numbers like these.
May 7, 2009 at 9:39 AM #394871ArrayaParticipantla times:
on Thursday that found that nearly 12% of U.S. homeowners were in arrears on their loans or in foreclosure. The numbers were even worse in battered states such as California, where 13% of homeowners were behind on their payments, and Florida, where 20% were late.<----That will keep rising. It was the highest level of distress ever recorded by the trade group, whose numbers go back to 1972. <---That means no historical precedence. The Obama administration’s plan to stave off foreclosures could fall flat in California, where nearly one-third of mortgage holders are underwater on their loans — many of them by amounts that would disqualify them for government-sponsored refinancing.
The problem is likely to be especially acute in areas like the Inland Empire, where homes have lost more than 40% of their value in the last year and nearly half the homeowners owe more on their loans than the properties are worth.
Real Estate is no longer local when you have numbers like these.
May 7, 2009 at 9:39 AM #395014ArrayaParticipantla times:
on Thursday that found that nearly 12% of U.S. homeowners were in arrears on their loans or in foreclosure. The numbers were even worse in battered states such as California, where 13% of homeowners were behind on their payments, and Florida, where 20% were late.<----That will keep rising. It was the highest level of distress ever recorded by the trade group, whose numbers go back to 1972. <---That means no historical precedence. The Obama administration’s plan to stave off foreclosures could fall flat in California, where nearly one-third of mortgage holders are underwater on their loans — many of them by amounts that would disqualify them for government-sponsored refinancing.
The problem is likely to be especially acute in areas like the Inland Empire, where homes have lost more than 40% of their value in the last year and nearly half the homeowners owe more on their loans than the properties are worth.
Real Estate is no longer local when you have numbers like these.
May 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM #394354jpinpbParticipantI’m not arguing that people are not upside down and in arrears. I agree. I see the NODs and it’s massive.
trex just stated on the adjusted median thread that his sister just got an 80k write down from Wells Fargo. That’s significant. I mean, 80k could buy you a place in some parts.
If banks follow suit, some of these NODs will never hit the market.
May 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM #394611jpinpbParticipantI’m not arguing that people are not upside down and in arrears. I agree. I see the NODs and it’s massive.
trex just stated on the adjusted median thread that his sister just got an 80k write down from Wells Fargo. That’s significant. I mean, 80k could buy you a place in some parts.
If banks follow suit, some of these NODs will never hit the market.
May 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM #394828jpinpbParticipantI’m not arguing that people are not upside down and in arrears. I agree. I see the NODs and it’s massive.
trex just stated on the adjusted median thread that his sister just got an 80k write down from Wells Fargo. That’s significant. I mean, 80k could buy you a place in some parts.
If banks follow suit, some of these NODs will never hit the market.
May 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM #394881jpinpbParticipantI’m not arguing that people are not upside down and in arrears. I agree. I see the NODs and it’s massive.
trex just stated on the adjusted median thread that his sister just got an 80k write down from Wells Fargo. That’s significant. I mean, 80k could buy you a place in some parts.
If banks follow suit, some of these NODs will never hit the market.
May 7, 2009 at 9:52 AM #395024jpinpbParticipantI’m not arguing that people are not upside down and in arrears. I agree. I see the NODs and it’s massive.
trex just stated on the adjusted median thread that his sister just got an 80k write down from Wells Fargo. That’s significant. I mean, 80k could buy you a place in some parts.
If banks follow suit, some of these NODs will never hit the market.
May 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM #394359ArrayaParticipantSome will never hit the market and some will and trying to figure out the percentage that will verse wont is impossible. Thinking it won’t be significant is not rational. Lots more credit contracting which leads to lots of more job losses and lots more wage deflation. Which is a feedback loop to foreclosures that cant be stopped and rents going down.
Maybe the should just call for a price decline moratorium. Save us some money.
May 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM #394616ArrayaParticipantSome will never hit the market and some will and trying to figure out the percentage that will verse wont is impossible. Thinking it won’t be significant is not rational. Lots more credit contracting which leads to lots of more job losses and lots more wage deflation. Which is a feedback loop to foreclosures that cant be stopped and rents going down.
Maybe the should just call for a price decline moratorium. Save us some money.
May 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM #394833ArrayaParticipantSome will never hit the market and some will and trying to figure out the percentage that will verse wont is impossible. Thinking it won’t be significant is not rational. Lots more credit contracting which leads to lots of more job losses and lots more wage deflation. Which is a feedback loop to foreclosures that cant be stopped and rents going down.
Maybe the should just call for a price decline moratorium. Save us some money.
May 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM #394886ArrayaParticipantSome will never hit the market and some will and trying to figure out the percentage that will verse wont is impossible. Thinking it won’t be significant is not rational. Lots more credit contracting which leads to lots of more job losses and lots more wage deflation. Which is a feedback loop to foreclosures that cant be stopped and rents going down.
Maybe the should just call for a price decline moratorium. Save us some money.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.