Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Forbes: Beware Of A Double-Dip Recession
- This topic has 120 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2010 at 9:26 PM #526423March 14, 2010 at 8:24 AM #525602JCParticipant
everyone is entitled to their view point, but i hope you are not suggesting that i am part of the ‘crew’. i am just posting info that i think this board would find interesting and i am clearly labeling where it came from. the second article i posted is less supportive of the main topic, which is why i posted it. i am in interested in many views on this topic.
March 14, 2010 at 8:24 AM #525734JCParticipanteveryone is entitled to their view point, but i hope you are not suggesting that i am part of the ‘crew’. i am just posting info that i think this board would find interesting and i am clearly labeling where it came from. the second article i posted is less supportive of the main topic, which is why i posted it. i am in interested in many views on this topic.
March 14, 2010 at 8:24 AM #526180JCParticipanteveryone is entitled to their view point, but i hope you are not suggesting that i am part of the ‘crew’. i am just posting info that i think this board would find interesting and i am clearly labeling where it came from. the second article i posted is less supportive of the main topic, which is why i posted it. i am in interested in many views on this topic.
March 14, 2010 at 8:24 AM #526276JCParticipanteveryone is entitled to their view point, but i hope you are not suggesting that i am part of the ‘crew’. i am just posting info that i think this board would find interesting and i am clearly labeling where it came from. the second article i posted is less supportive of the main topic, which is why i posted it. i am in interested in many views on this topic.
March 14, 2010 at 8:24 AM #526533JCParticipanteveryone is entitled to their view point, but i hope you are not suggesting that i am part of the ‘crew’. i am just posting info that i think this board would find interesting and i am clearly labeling where it came from. the second article i posted is less supportive of the main topic, which is why i posted it. i am in interested in many views on this topic.
March 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM #525617ArrayaParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Ahhhh…. the tinfoil hat crew in full regalia[/quote]
Well gee whiz, I know you’re a realtor and all, and commonsense can be detrimental to your income. But give it a try once in a while.
Speculation that there is coordination between the federal reserve chairman -politicians and the board members of said organization should be understood. Not looked at as “tinfoil”.
Since all actions taken have been to keep RE elevated, is it really that wild an accusation that there is further coordination, at a high level, to withhold inventory – which happens to keep prices elevated?
March 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM #525749ArrayaParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Ahhhh…. the tinfoil hat crew in full regalia[/quote]
Well gee whiz, I know you’re a realtor and all, and commonsense can be detrimental to your income. But give it a try once in a while.
Speculation that there is coordination between the federal reserve chairman -politicians and the board members of said organization should be understood. Not looked at as “tinfoil”.
Since all actions taken have been to keep RE elevated, is it really that wild an accusation that there is further coordination, at a high level, to withhold inventory – which happens to keep prices elevated?
March 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM #526195ArrayaParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Ahhhh…. the tinfoil hat crew in full regalia[/quote]
Well gee whiz, I know you’re a realtor and all, and commonsense can be detrimental to your income. But give it a try once in a while.
Speculation that there is coordination between the federal reserve chairman -politicians and the board members of said organization should be understood. Not looked at as “tinfoil”.
Since all actions taken have been to keep RE elevated, is it really that wild an accusation that there is further coordination, at a high level, to withhold inventory – which happens to keep prices elevated?
March 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM #526291ArrayaParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Ahhhh…. the tinfoil hat crew in full regalia[/quote]
Well gee whiz, I know you’re a realtor and all, and commonsense can be detrimental to your income. But give it a try once in a while.
Speculation that there is coordination between the federal reserve chairman -politicians and the board members of said organization should be understood. Not looked at as “tinfoil”.
Since all actions taken have been to keep RE elevated, is it really that wild an accusation that there is further coordination, at a high level, to withhold inventory – which happens to keep prices elevated?
March 14, 2010 at 9:28 AM #526548ArrayaParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]Ahhhh…. the tinfoil hat crew in full regalia[/quote]
Well gee whiz, I know you’re a realtor and all, and commonsense can be detrimental to your income. But give it a try once in a while.
Speculation that there is coordination between the federal reserve chairman -politicians and the board members of said organization should be understood. Not looked at as “tinfoil”.
Since all actions taken have been to keep RE elevated, is it really that wild an accusation that there is further coordination, at a high level, to withhold inventory – which happens to keep prices elevated?
March 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM #525637sdrealtorParticipantJC you are exempt. Arraya you look good in silver headgear. Being a realtor has nothing to do anything. I dont care where prices go and with my style/personality I do far better in a down/declining market any way. You are the one lacking commonsense if you beleive what you proposed is possible. You didnt say coordination, you said the fed could release inventory. That is nonsense. Sure the feds can aid and abet things but they do not have the ability to withhold inventory from the market any more than they could stop you from selling your tinfoil hats on the street corner.
March 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM #525769sdrealtorParticipantJC you are exempt. Arraya you look good in silver headgear. Being a realtor has nothing to do anything. I dont care where prices go and with my style/personality I do far better in a down/declining market any way. You are the one lacking commonsense if you beleive what you proposed is possible. You didnt say coordination, you said the fed could release inventory. That is nonsense. Sure the feds can aid and abet things but they do not have the ability to withhold inventory from the market any more than they could stop you from selling your tinfoil hats on the street corner.
March 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM #526215sdrealtorParticipantJC you are exempt. Arraya you look good in silver headgear. Being a realtor has nothing to do anything. I dont care where prices go and with my style/personality I do far better in a down/declining market any way. You are the one lacking commonsense if you beleive what you proposed is possible. You didnt say coordination, you said the fed could release inventory. That is nonsense. Sure the feds can aid and abet things but they do not have the ability to withhold inventory from the market any more than they could stop you from selling your tinfoil hats on the street corner.
March 14, 2010 at 10:05 AM #526312sdrealtorParticipantJC you are exempt. Arraya you look good in silver headgear. Being a realtor has nothing to do anything. I dont care where prices go and with my style/personality I do far better in a down/declining market any way. You are the one lacking commonsense if you beleive what you proposed is possible. You didnt say coordination, you said the fed could release inventory. That is nonsense. Sure the feds can aid and abet things but they do not have the ability to withhold inventory from the market any more than they could stop you from selling your tinfoil hats on the street corner.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.