Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Flippers Still Active in Chula Vista?
- This topic has 45 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by
recordsclerk.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 27, 2008 at 3:23 AM #12260
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #176893
recordsclerk
ParticipantI think the $340K was the amount the bank paid when it took over the property. This is a bank owned forclosure. This is not a flip job.
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM #176909
recordsclerk
ParticipantBTW that is a nice house for the price.
-
March 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM #176948
meadandale
ParticipantNice house?
The kitchen is tiny. The lot is barely larger than the house. Probably 2500 sq ft.
These houses would be a nice house for the price at about $225k.
-
March 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #177063
recordsclerk
ParticipantYou can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+. I would have to agree with you about the $225k price. Kitchens for 2000sqft homes all usually small L-shaped kitchens. Rarely do you find one with an island or grand appearance, that’s why I prefer larger homes 3500sqft and larger.
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM #177313
ocean
ParticipantI looked at some new condos @ the summit a few weeks ago.Although they have some pretty interesting floor plans up there,the hoa and mello roos are very high.The builder has a long way to go if they ever sell the place out,and is passing along huge hoa fees to the poor slubs who buy up there now.I sold in ocean view hills in 04.The hoa and mello roos are very low…..check it out!
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM #177666
ocean
ParticipantI looked at some new condos @ the summit a few weeks ago.Although they have some pretty interesting floor plans up there,the hoa and mello roos are very high.The builder has a long way to go if they ever sell the place out,and is passing along huge hoa fees to the poor slubs who buy up there now.I sold in ocean view hills in 04.The hoa and mello roos are very low…..check it out!
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM #177674
ocean
ParticipantI looked at some new condos @ the summit a few weeks ago.Although they have some pretty interesting floor plans up there,the hoa and mello roos are very high.The builder has a long way to go if they ever sell the place out,and is passing along huge hoa fees to the poor slubs who buy up there now.I sold in ocean view hills in 04.The hoa and mello roos are very low…..check it out!
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM #177680
ocean
ParticipantI looked at some new condos @ the summit a few weeks ago.Although they have some pretty interesting floor plans up there,the hoa and mello roos are very high.The builder has a long way to go if they ever sell the place out,and is passing along huge hoa fees to the poor slubs who buy up there now.I sold in ocean view hills in 04.The hoa and mello roos are very low…..check it out!
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:02 PM #177767
ocean
ParticipantI looked at some new condos @ the summit a few weeks ago.Although they have some pretty interesting floor plans up there,the hoa and mello roos are very high.The builder has a long way to go if they ever sell the place out,and is passing along huge hoa fees to the poor slubs who buy up there now.I sold in ocean view hills in 04.The hoa and mello roos are very low…..check it out!
-
March 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #177523
meadandale
Participant“You can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+”
You can if it’s 2 stories….and those are. Just look at them on the map. Other than the house, there’s a tiny strip of grass in the back yard that can’t be more than about 400 sq ft.
-
March 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM #177568
recordsclerk
Participantmeadandale,
I going to concede to you about the lot size. I can’t find any concrete evidence on any listings in that area to prove you wrong.
Would $133sqft be a good price point for homes in Chula Vista?
Would a property that sells for 50% off original sales price be a good deal? -
March 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM #177921
recordsclerk
Participantmeadandale,
I going to concede to you about the lot size. I can’t find any concrete evidence on any listings in that area to prove you wrong.
Would $133sqft be a good price point for homes in Chula Vista?
Would a property that sells for 50% off original sales price be a good deal? -
March 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM #177927
recordsclerk
Participantmeadandale,
I going to concede to you about the lot size. I can’t find any concrete evidence on any listings in that area to prove you wrong.
Would $133sqft be a good price point for homes in Chula Vista?
Would a property that sells for 50% off original sales price be a good deal? -
March 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM #177935
recordsclerk
Participantmeadandale,
I going to concede to you about the lot size. I can’t find any concrete evidence on any listings in that area to prove you wrong.
Would $133sqft be a good price point for homes in Chula Vista?
Would a property that sells for 50% off original sales price be a good deal? -
March 28, 2008 at 9:23 AM #178024
recordsclerk
Participantmeadandale,
I going to concede to you about the lot size. I can’t find any concrete evidence on any listings in that area to prove you wrong.
Would $133sqft be a good price point for homes in Chula Vista?
Would a property that sells for 50% off original sales price be a good deal? -
March 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #177876
meadandale
Participant“You can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+”
You can if it’s 2 stories….and those are. Just look at them on the map. Other than the house, there’s a tiny strip of grass in the back yard that can’t be more than about 400 sq ft.
-
March 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #177882
meadandale
Participant“You can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+”
You can if it’s 2 stories….and those are. Just look at them on the map. Other than the house, there’s a tiny strip of grass in the back yard that can’t be more than about 400 sq ft.
-
March 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #177890
meadandale
Participant“You can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+”
You can if it’s 2 stories….and those are. Just look at them on the map. Other than the house, there’s a tiny strip of grass in the back yard that can’t be more than about 400 sq ft.
-
March 28, 2008 at 7:57 AM #177979
meadandale
Participant“You can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+”
You can if it’s 2 stories….and those are. Just look at them on the map. Other than the house, there’s a tiny strip of grass in the back yard that can’t be more than about 400 sq ft.
-
March 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #177414
recordsclerk
ParticipantYou can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+. I would have to agree with you about the $225k price. Kitchens for 2000sqft homes all usually small L-shaped kitchens. Rarely do you find one with an island or grand appearance, that’s why I prefer larger homes 3500sqft and larger.
-
March 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #177423
recordsclerk
ParticipantYou can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+. I would have to agree with you about the $225k price. Kitchens for 2000sqft homes all usually small L-shaped kitchens. Rarely do you find one with an island or grand appearance, that’s why I prefer larger homes 3500sqft and larger.
-
March 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #177431
recordsclerk
ParticipantYou can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+. I would have to agree with you about the $225k price. Kitchens for 2000sqft homes all usually small L-shaped kitchens. Rarely do you find one with an island or grand appearance, that’s why I prefer larger homes 3500sqft and larger.
-
March 27, 2008 at 12:18 PM #177517
recordsclerk
ParticipantYou can’t fit a 2000sqft home on a 2500sqft lot. More like 4000+. I would have to agree with you about the $225k price. Kitchens for 2000sqft homes all usually small L-shaped kitchens. Rarely do you find one with an island or grand appearance, that’s why I prefer larger homes 3500sqft and larger.
-
March 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM #177301
meadandale
ParticipantNice house?
The kitchen is tiny. The lot is barely larger than the house. Probably 2500 sq ft.
These houses would be a nice house for the price at about $225k.
-
March 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM #177309
meadandale
ParticipantNice house?
The kitchen is tiny. The lot is barely larger than the house. Probably 2500 sq ft.
These houses would be a nice house for the price at about $225k.
-
March 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM #177315
meadandale
ParticipantNice house?
The kitchen is tiny. The lot is barely larger than the house. Probably 2500 sq ft.
These houses would be a nice house for the price at about $225k.
-
March 27, 2008 at 10:28 AM #177402
meadandale
ParticipantNice house?
The kitchen is tiny. The lot is barely larger than the house. Probably 2500 sq ft.
These houses would be a nice house for the price at about $225k.
-
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM #177260
recordsclerk
ParticipantBTW that is a nice house for the price.
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM #177269
recordsclerk
ParticipantBTW that is a nice house for the price.
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM #177273
recordsclerk
ParticipantBTW that is a nice house for the price.
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:33 AM #177362
recordsclerk
ParticipantBTW that is a nice house for the price.
-
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #177246
recordsclerk
ParticipantI think the $340K was the amount the bank paid when it took over the property. This is a bank owned forclosure. This is not a flip job.
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #177254
recordsclerk
ParticipantI think the $340K was the amount the bank paid when it took over the property. This is a bank owned forclosure. This is not a flip job.
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #177261
recordsclerk
ParticipantI think the $340K was the amount the bank paid when it took over the property. This is a bank owned forclosure. This is not a flip job.
-
March 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM #177347
recordsclerk
ParticipantI think the $340K was the amount the bank paid when it took over the property. This is a bank owned forclosure. This is not a flip job.
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:49 AM #176923
barnaby33
Participant20k hardly would be worth flipping once you figure in commissions and taxes. Actually its funny if you take 340k and multiply by 6% you get 20.4 Add that to 340 and you get 360.4. Sounds like the bank is selling for exactly what they tool it back for plus commissions.
Josh
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:49 AM #177276
barnaby33
Participant20k hardly would be worth flipping once you figure in commissions and taxes. Actually its funny if you take 340k and multiply by 6% you get 20.4 Add that to 340 and you get 360.4. Sounds like the bank is selling for exactly what they tool it back for plus commissions.
Josh
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:49 AM #177285
barnaby33
Participant20k hardly would be worth flipping once you figure in commissions and taxes. Actually its funny if you take 340k and multiply by 6% you get 20.4 Add that to 340 and you get 360.4. Sounds like the bank is selling for exactly what they tool it back for plus commissions.
Josh
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:49 AM #177289
barnaby33
Participant20k hardly would be worth flipping once you figure in commissions and taxes. Actually its funny if you take 340k and multiply by 6% you get 20.4 Add that to 340 and you get 360.4. Sounds like the bank is selling for exactly what they tool it back for plus commissions.
Josh
-
March 27, 2008 at 9:49 AM #177377
barnaby33
Participant20k hardly would be worth flipping once you figure in commissions and taxes. Actually its funny if you take 340k and multiply by 6% you get 20.4 Add that to 340 and you get 360.4. Sounds like the bank is selling for exactly what they tool it back for plus commissions.
Josh
-
March 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM #176913
Eugene
Participant“The seller has never occupied the property and is exempt from supplying the buyer with a TDS” is jargon for “bank owned”.
Personally I like the pricing. For this house, for example, ITI plus HOA and Mello Roos, minus mortgage deduction comes up to $1850/month.
-
March 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM #177266
Eugene
Participant“The seller has never occupied the property and is exempt from supplying the buyer with a TDS” is jargon for “bank owned”.
Personally I like the pricing. For this house, for example, ITI plus HOA and Mello Roos, minus mortgage deduction comes up to $1850/month.
-
March 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM #177274
Eugene
Participant“The seller has never occupied the property and is exempt from supplying the buyer with a TDS” is jargon for “bank owned”.
Personally I like the pricing. For this house, for example, ITI plus HOA and Mello Roos, minus mortgage deduction comes up to $1850/month.
-
March 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM #177279
Eugene
Participant“The seller has never occupied the property and is exempt from supplying the buyer with a TDS” is jargon for “bank owned”.
Personally I like the pricing. For this house, for example, ITI plus HOA and Mello Roos, minus mortgage deduction comes up to $1850/month.
-
March 27, 2008 at 11:03 AM #177367
Eugene
Participant“The seller has never occupied the property and is exempt from supplying the buyer with a TDS” is jargon for “bank owned”.
Personally I like the pricing. For this house, for example, ITI plus HOA and Mello Roos, minus mortgage deduction comes up to $1850/month.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.