Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Feds see recovery soon. prepare for another leg down…
- This topic has 55 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by Coronita.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 15, 2009 at 8:05 PM #16040July 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM #431167jpinpbParticipant
I love some of the comments on his blog. Rob’s is the one that I’d like an answer to. Which sector is leading us out?
Also:
“Did they mention when I would get a raise? Or a higher paying job?”Or maybe people will suddenly see HELOCs become available to them. That had been income supplementation for a few years.
Buzzsaw had it right: “I really admire the bankers. It takes big-ballz to flaunt your uber-wealth in front of an unemployed mob.”
And another good point made by black dog: “Well, will someone please explain this quote from LAST WEEK.
Summers says the recession has a long way to go and the worst is still ahead. Summers says: “I don’t think the worst is over … It’s very likely that more jobs will be lost. It would not be surprising if GDP has not yet reached its low. What does appear to be true is that the sense of panic in the markets and freefall in the economy has subsided and one does not have the sense of a situation as out of control as a few months ago.”
July 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM #431903jpinpbParticipantI love some of the comments on his blog. Rob’s is the one that I’d like an answer to. Which sector is leading us out?
Also:
“Did they mention when I would get a raise? Or a higher paying job?”Or maybe people will suddenly see HELOCs become available to them. That had been income supplementation for a few years.
Buzzsaw had it right: “I really admire the bankers. It takes big-ballz to flaunt your uber-wealth in front of an unemployed mob.”
And another good point made by black dog: “Well, will someone please explain this quote from LAST WEEK.
Summers says the recession has a long way to go and the worst is still ahead. Summers says: “I don’t think the worst is over … It’s very likely that more jobs will be lost. It would not be surprising if GDP has not yet reached its low. What does appear to be true is that the sense of panic in the markets and freefall in the economy has subsided and one does not have the sense of a situation as out of control as a few months ago.”
July 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM #431741jpinpbParticipantI love some of the comments on his blog. Rob’s is the one that I’d like an answer to. Which sector is leading us out?
Also:
“Did they mention when I would get a raise? Or a higher paying job?”Or maybe people will suddenly see HELOCs become available to them. That had been income supplementation for a few years.
Buzzsaw had it right: “I really admire the bankers. It takes big-ballz to flaunt your uber-wealth in front of an unemployed mob.”
And another good point made by black dog: “Well, will someone please explain this quote from LAST WEEK.
Summers says the recession has a long way to go and the worst is still ahead. Summers says: “I don’t think the worst is over … It’s very likely that more jobs will be lost. It would not be surprising if GDP has not yet reached its low. What does appear to be true is that the sense of panic in the markets and freefall in the economy has subsided and one does not have the sense of a situation as out of control as a few months ago.”
July 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM #431671jpinpbParticipantI love some of the comments on his blog. Rob’s is the one that I’d like an answer to. Which sector is leading us out?
Also:
“Did they mention when I would get a raise? Or a higher paying job?”Or maybe people will suddenly see HELOCs become available to them. That had been income supplementation for a few years.
Buzzsaw had it right: “I really admire the bankers. It takes big-ballz to flaunt your uber-wealth in front of an unemployed mob.”
And another good point made by black dog: “Well, will someone please explain this quote from LAST WEEK.
Summers says the recession has a long way to go and the worst is still ahead. Summers says: “I don’t think the worst is over … It’s very likely that more jobs will be lost. It would not be surprising if GDP has not yet reached its low. What does appear to be true is that the sense of panic in the markets and freefall in the economy has subsided and one does not have the sense of a situation as out of control as a few months ago.”
July 15, 2009 at 8:39 PM #431382jpinpbParticipantI love some of the comments on his blog. Rob’s is the one that I’d like an answer to. Which sector is leading us out?
Also:
“Did they mention when I would get a raise? Or a higher paying job?”Or maybe people will suddenly see HELOCs become available to them. That had been income supplementation for a few years.
Buzzsaw had it right: “I really admire the bankers. It takes big-ballz to flaunt your uber-wealth in front of an unemployed mob.”
And another good point made by black dog: “Well, will someone please explain this quote from LAST WEEK.
Summers says the recession has a long way to go and the worst is still ahead. Summers says: “I don’t think the worst is over … It’s very likely that more jobs will be lost. It would not be surprising if GDP has not yet reached its low. What does appear to be true is that the sense of panic in the markets and freefall in the economy has subsided and one does not have the sense of a situation as out of control as a few months ago.”
July 16, 2009 at 8:20 AM #431905CoronitaParticipantWell the umemployment numbers came down….with the standard government footnotes 🙂
July 16, 2009 at 8:20 AM #431543CoronitaParticipantWell the umemployment numbers came down….with the standard government footnotes 🙂
July 16, 2009 at 8:20 AM #431332CoronitaParticipantWell the umemployment numbers came down….with the standard government footnotes 🙂
July 16, 2009 at 8:20 AM #432064CoronitaParticipantWell the umemployment numbers came down….with the standard government footnotes 🙂
July 16, 2009 at 8:20 AM #431835CoronitaParticipantWell the umemployment numbers came down….with the standard government footnotes 🙂
July 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #431668DWCAPParticipant“The unadjusted figures for last week actually showed that new claims rose by 86,389 last week, which would push the total to 667,534.
Those adjustment difficulties also were behind a big drop reported for people continuing to draw unemployment benefits, the analyst said.
The number of people still collecting benefits fell by a seasonally adjusted 642,000 to 6.27 million, the lowest level since mid-April.
The unadjusted figures for continued claims showed an increase of 63,714.”
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jul/16/us-economy-071609/?business&zIndex=133023
please keep in mind that the continuing claims numbers exclude all the people on the ‘special’ unemplpoyment roles. I havent seen the numbers for this week, but a short while ago we had drops in the reported roles that were mostly just people shifting to the unreported ‘special’ group. That isnt exactly the good thing they are trying to convey in the press.
Increadably the UT had a better breakdown than the national media, who I occaisionally believe is outsorcing due to layoffs to the journalism programs at local middle schools.
July 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #431962DWCAPParticipant“The unadjusted figures for last week actually showed that new claims rose by 86,389 last week, which would push the total to 667,534.
Those adjustment difficulties also were behind a big drop reported for people continuing to draw unemployment benefits, the analyst said.
The number of people still collecting benefits fell by a seasonally adjusted 642,000 to 6.27 million, the lowest level since mid-April.
The unadjusted figures for continued claims showed an increase of 63,714.”
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jul/16/us-economy-071609/?business&zIndex=133023
please keep in mind that the continuing claims numbers exclude all the people on the ‘special’ unemplpoyment roles. I havent seen the numbers for this week, but a short while ago we had drops in the reported roles that were mostly just people shifting to the unreported ‘special’ group. That isnt exactly the good thing they are trying to convey in the press.
Increadably the UT had a better breakdown than the national media, who I occaisionally believe is outsorcing due to layoffs to the journalism programs at local middle schools.
July 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #432031DWCAPParticipant“The unadjusted figures for last week actually showed that new claims rose by 86,389 last week, which would push the total to 667,534.
Those adjustment difficulties also were behind a big drop reported for people continuing to draw unemployment benefits, the analyst said.
The number of people still collecting benefits fell by a seasonally adjusted 642,000 to 6.27 million, the lowest level since mid-April.
The unadjusted figures for continued claims showed an increase of 63,714.”
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jul/16/us-economy-071609/?business&zIndex=133023
please keep in mind that the continuing claims numbers exclude all the people on the ‘special’ unemplpoyment roles. I havent seen the numbers for this week, but a short while ago we had drops in the reported roles that were mostly just people shifting to the unreported ‘special’ group. That isnt exactly the good thing they are trying to convey in the press.
Increadably the UT had a better breakdown than the national media, who I occaisionally believe is outsorcing due to layoffs to the journalism programs at local middle schools.
July 16, 2009 at 12:10 PM #431458DWCAPParticipant“The unadjusted figures for last week actually showed that new claims rose by 86,389 last week, which would push the total to 667,534.
Those adjustment difficulties also were behind a big drop reported for people continuing to draw unemployment benefits, the analyst said.
The number of people still collecting benefits fell by a seasonally adjusted 642,000 to 6.27 million, the lowest level since mid-April.
The unadjusted figures for continued claims showed an increase of 63,714.”
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/jul/16/us-economy-071609/?business&zIndex=133023
please keep in mind that the continuing claims numbers exclude all the people on the ‘special’ unemplpoyment roles. I havent seen the numbers for this week, but a short while ago we had drops in the reported roles that were mostly just people shifting to the unreported ‘special’ group. That isnt exactly the good thing they are trying to convey in the press.
Increadably the UT had a better breakdown than the national media, who I occaisionally believe is outsorcing due to layoffs to the journalism programs at local middle schools.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.