- This topic has 95 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by PadreBrian.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 14, 2008 at 9:54 AM #238993July 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM #239203kev374Participant
correct me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
July 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM #239397kev374Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
July 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM #239405kev374Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
July 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM #239340kev374Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
July 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM #239345kev374Participantcorrect me if I am wrong but a failure of Freddie or Fannie and a consequent bailout by the government will first require liquidation of shareholder equity. This means shareholders get nothing! So any talk of a possible bailout plan should send shares down not up because it confirms that the situation is precarious.
July 14, 2008 at 5:29 PM #239402DWCAPParticipantFLU, my take on that pic.
“Please Mr Tax Payer Sir; May I have another 5 Trillion dollars?”
July 14, 2008 at 5:29 PM #239409DWCAPParticipantFLU, my take on that pic.
“Please Mr Tax Payer Sir; May I have another 5 Trillion dollars?”
July 14, 2008 at 5:29 PM #239349DWCAPParticipantFLU, my take on that pic.
“Please Mr Tax Payer Sir; May I have another 5 Trillion dollars?”
July 14, 2008 at 5:29 PM #239344DWCAPParticipantFLU, my take on that pic.
“Please Mr Tax Payer Sir; May I have another 5 Trillion dollars?”
July 14, 2008 at 5:29 PM #239208DWCAPParticipantFLU, my take on that pic.
“Please Mr Tax Payer Sir; May I have another 5 Trillion dollars?”
July 14, 2008 at 5:31 PM #239416daveljParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]Here’s a picture of U.S. Treas Sec Henry Paulson…
Caption this.
I’ll start….
“Dear Lord, please make this plan work…Amen”
[/quote]Here’s mine:
“Gentlemen, I have a plan inside my hands. It’s a magical plan. Proprietary, if you will. But mainly magical. That’s why I have to keep it hidden from view – inside my hands where bad people – evil naysayers – can’t view it. Unlike previous plans, which have failed woefully thus far, this magical proprietary plan will work. And work really really well. But before I can open my hands and unveil this magical plan, I need a promise from you. Hey, what sort of magical plan would come without some strings attached, right? But I digress. What I need is access to, say, about $500 billion of our money. I say “our” because as a U.S. taxpayer I own a teeny tiny part of that $500 billion. So, it really is “our” money. Anyhow, once you promise to give me access to the $500 billion, then and only then will I open my hands and unveil the magical plan. Which, again, is going to work really really well. Hey, if you can’t trust Big Hank – the Treasury Secretary – then who can you trust, right? So, about that promise… and no finger crossing either.”
July 14, 2008 at 5:31 PM #239350daveljParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]Here’s a picture of U.S. Treas Sec Henry Paulson…
Caption this.
I’ll start….
“Dear Lord, please make this plan work…Amen”
[/quote]Here’s mine:
“Gentlemen, I have a plan inside my hands. It’s a magical plan. Proprietary, if you will. But mainly magical. That’s why I have to keep it hidden from view – inside my hands where bad people – evil naysayers – can’t view it. Unlike previous plans, which have failed woefully thus far, this magical proprietary plan will work. And work really really well. But before I can open my hands and unveil this magical plan, I need a promise from you. Hey, what sort of magical plan would come without some strings attached, right? But I digress. What I need is access to, say, about $500 billion of our money. I say “our” because as a U.S. taxpayer I own a teeny tiny part of that $500 billion. So, it really is “our” money. Anyhow, once you promise to give me access to the $500 billion, then and only then will I open my hands and unveil the magical plan. Which, again, is going to work really really well. Hey, if you can’t trust Big Hank – the Treasury Secretary – then who can you trust, right? So, about that promise… and no finger crossing either.”
July 14, 2008 at 5:31 PM #239355daveljParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]Here’s a picture of U.S. Treas Sec Henry Paulson…
Caption this.
I’ll start….
“Dear Lord, please make this plan work…Amen”
[/quote]Here’s mine:
“Gentlemen, I have a plan inside my hands. It’s a magical plan. Proprietary, if you will. But mainly magical. That’s why I have to keep it hidden from view – inside my hands where bad people – evil naysayers – can’t view it. Unlike previous plans, which have failed woefully thus far, this magical proprietary plan will work. And work really really well. But before I can open my hands and unveil this magical plan, I need a promise from you. Hey, what sort of magical plan would come without some strings attached, right? But I digress. What I need is access to, say, about $500 billion of our money. I say “our” because as a U.S. taxpayer I own a teeny tiny part of that $500 billion. So, it really is “our” money. Anyhow, once you promise to give me access to the $500 billion, then and only then will I open my hands and unveil the magical plan. Which, again, is going to work really really well. Hey, if you can’t trust Big Hank – the Treasury Secretary – then who can you trust, right? So, about that promise… and no finger crossing either.”
July 14, 2008 at 5:31 PM #239407daveljParticipant[quote=fat_lazy_union_worker]Here’s a picture of U.S. Treas Sec Henry Paulson…
Caption this.
I’ll start….
“Dear Lord, please make this plan work…Amen”
[/quote]Here’s mine:
“Gentlemen, I have a plan inside my hands. It’s a magical plan. Proprietary, if you will. But mainly magical. That’s why I have to keep it hidden from view – inside my hands where bad people – evil naysayers – can’t view it. Unlike previous plans, which have failed woefully thus far, this magical proprietary plan will work. And work really really well. But before I can open my hands and unveil this magical plan, I need a promise from you. Hey, what sort of magical plan would come without some strings attached, right? But I digress. What I need is access to, say, about $500 billion of our money. I say “our” because as a U.S. taxpayer I own a teeny tiny part of that $500 billion. So, it really is “our” money. Anyhow, once you promise to give me access to the $500 billion, then and only then will I open my hands and unveil the magical plan. Which, again, is going to work really really well. Hey, if you can’t trust Big Hank – the Treasury Secretary – then who can you trust, right? So, about that promise… and no finger crossing either.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.