Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Fed forcing big bank down this week?!
- This topic has 72 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by Ricechex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 26, 2008 at 8:01 AM #276209September 26, 2008 at 11:52 AM #276385underdoseParticipant
“From what I am hearing JP Morgan won WaMu through FDIC auction at least a week ago. ”
capeman, where are you hearing this? Can you give links to sources/news stories? We’ve been combing the internet trying to find any reference anywhere to JP having any control of WaMu prior to 9/25, but nothing turns up. I agree with your evaluation that it happened too fast, too seemlessly to have just occurred yesterday. But where’s the proof? If you can point to any, I’d be truly grateful!
September 26, 2008 at 11:52 AM #276372underdoseParticipant“From what I am hearing JP Morgan won WaMu through FDIC auction at least a week ago. ”
capeman, where are you hearing this? Can you give links to sources/news stories? We’ve been combing the internet trying to find any reference anywhere to JP having any control of WaMu prior to 9/25, but nothing turns up. I agree with your evaluation that it happened too fast, too seemlessly to have just occurred yesterday. But where’s the proof? If you can point to any, I’d be truly grateful!
September 26, 2008 at 11:52 AM #276320underdoseParticipant“From what I am hearing JP Morgan won WaMu through FDIC auction at least a week ago. ”
capeman, where are you hearing this? Can you give links to sources/news stories? We’ve been combing the internet trying to find any reference anywhere to JP having any control of WaMu prior to 9/25, but nothing turns up. I agree with your evaluation that it happened too fast, too seemlessly to have just occurred yesterday. But where’s the proof? If you can point to any, I’d be truly grateful!
September 26, 2008 at 11:52 AM #276318underdoseParticipant“From what I am hearing JP Morgan won WaMu through FDIC auction at least a week ago. ”
capeman, where are you hearing this? Can you give links to sources/news stories? We’ve been combing the internet trying to find any reference anywhere to JP having any control of WaMu prior to 9/25, but nothing turns up. I agree with your evaluation that it happened too fast, too seemlessly to have just occurred yesterday. But where’s the proof? If you can point to any, I’d be truly grateful!
September 26, 2008 at 11:52 AM #276067underdoseParticipant“From what I am hearing JP Morgan won WaMu through FDIC auction at least a week ago. ”
capeman, where are you hearing this? Can you give links to sources/news stories? We’ve been combing the internet trying to find any reference anywhere to JP having any control of WaMu prior to 9/25, but nothing turns up. I agree with your evaluation that it happened too fast, too seemlessly to have just occurred yesterday. But where’s the proof? If you can point to any, I’d be truly grateful!
September 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM #276350crParticipantMaybe the Fed funded the acquisition of WaMu too, only this time they’re keeping it under wraps. Here’s my theory:
– News sites say JPM paid $1.9 Billion and that WM had $307 Billion in assets.
– $125B for $307B in questionable assets, though certainly not all bad, for $0.40 on the dollar
– JPM fronts 1.5% of their own to close the deal
It’s a stretch but a bigger mistake would be for the Hanky-Franky-Bernanke party to stir up so much fear that the rest of the country actually does panic.
September 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM #276351crParticipantMaybe the Fed funded the acquisition of WaMu too, only this time they’re keeping it under wraps. Here’s my theory:
– News sites say JPM paid $1.9 Billion and that WM had $307 Billion in assets.
– $125B for $307B in questionable assets, though certainly not all bad, for $0.40 on the dollar
– JPM fronts 1.5% of their own to close the deal
It’s a stretch but a bigger mistake would be for the Hanky-Franky-Bernanke party to stir up so much fear that the rest of the country actually does panic.
September 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM #276366crParticipantMaybe the Fed funded the acquisition of WaMu too, only this time they’re keeping it under wraps. Here’s my theory:
– News sites say JPM paid $1.9 Billion and that WM had $307 Billion in assets.
– $125B for $307B in questionable assets, though certainly not all bad, for $0.40 on the dollar
– JPM fronts 1.5% of their own to close the deal
It’s a stretch but a bigger mistake would be for the Hanky-Franky-Bernanke party to stir up so much fear that the rest of the country actually does panic.
September 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM #276097crParticipantMaybe the Fed funded the acquisition of WaMu too, only this time they’re keeping it under wraps. Here’s my theory:
– News sites say JPM paid $1.9 Billion and that WM had $307 Billion in assets.
– $125B for $307B in questionable assets, though certainly not all bad, for $0.40 on the dollar
– JPM fronts 1.5% of their own to close the deal
It’s a stretch but a bigger mistake would be for the Hanky-Franky-Bernanke party to stir up so much fear that the rest of the country actually does panic.
September 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM #276416crParticipantMaybe the Fed funded the acquisition of WaMu too, only this time they’re keeping it under wraps. Here’s my theory:
– News sites say JPM paid $1.9 Billion and that WM had $307 Billion in assets.
– $125B for $307B in questionable assets, though certainly not all bad, for $0.40 on the dollar
– JPM fronts 1.5% of their own to close the deal
It’s a stretch but a bigger mistake would be for the Hanky-Franky-Bernanke party to stir up so much fear that the rest of the country actually does panic.
September 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM #276402crParticipantMaybe the Fed funded the acquisition of WaMu too, only this time they’re keeping it under wraps. Here’s my theory:
– News sites say JPM paid $1.9 Billion and that WM had $307 Billion in assets.
– $125B for $307B in questionable assets, though certainly not all bad, for $0.40 on the dollar
– JPM fronts 1.5% of their own to close the deal
It’s a stretch but a bigger mistake would be for the Hanky-Franky-Bernanke party to stir up so much fear that the rest of the country actually does panic.
September 26, 2008 at 1:23 PM #276102HereWeGoParticipantThis seems like a huge win for the FDIC, though. To have that bank go under and have all deposits transferred smoothly resulting in a 2B profit for the FDIC was incredible IMO.
September 26, 2008 at 1:23 PM #276355HereWeGoParticipantThis seems like a huge win for the FDIC, though. To have that bank go under and have all deposits transferred smoothly resulting in a 2B profit for the FDIC was incredible IMO.
September 26, 2008 at 1:23 PM #276357HereWeGoParticipantThis seems like a huge win for the FDIC, though. To have that bank go under and have all deposits transferred smoothly resulting in a 2B profit for the FDIC was incredible IMO.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.