- This topic has 55 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 26, 2010 at 11:34 AM #571885June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #572803desmondParticipant
I have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #571793desmondParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #572409desmondParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #572513desmondParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #571890desmondParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #571803WickedheartParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #572419WickedheartParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #572523WickedheartParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #572813WickedheartParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #571900WickedheartParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #572828desmondParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #572434desmondParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #572538desmondParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #571818desmondParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.