- This topic has 55 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 26, 2010 at 11:34 AM #571885June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #572803
desmond
ParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #571793ParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #572409ParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #572513ParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM #571890ParticipantI have another printer for general printing, have to keep the fax for customers that still fax me.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #571803Wickedheart
ParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #572419ParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #572523ParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #572813ParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:46 AM #571900ParticipantHP is evil. I HATE my HP printer. HP purposely made the printer with pic rollers so sensitive they will only work with HP photo paper. No other will work. HP photo paper is rough on the backside. The printer is so prone to jamming, it sucks. It wouldn’t really bother me to have to use HP paper if it wasn’t significantly more expensive. If something costs twice as much I kind of expect that it should be much better quality.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #572828ParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #572434ParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #572538ParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
June 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM #571818ParticipantThanks Flu, those are some good prices.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.