- This topic has 20 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by AK.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 15, 2010 at 7:41 AM #526799March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526104AKParticipant
Of course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #525972AKParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526550AKParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526647AKParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526904AKParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.