- This topic has 20 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 9 months ago by
AK.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 15, 2010 at 7:41 AM #526799March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #525972
AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526104AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526550AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526647AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
March 15, 2010 at 8:39 AM #526904AK
ParticipantOf course I’m not a lawyer. If I were I’d be charging you for my pearls / pellets of wisdom.
I’m thinking buyers who claim they were misled about deficiency judgments, impact on credit rating, tax liability for debt forgiveness, and so on.
And under the right circumstances, perhaps homeowners who will claim some technical violation of the laws surrounding distress sales, and seek to rescind the sale. Of course that wouldn’t make sense unless there were a massive rebound in home prices within two years … and even if that happened I’m not sure it would make much legal sense.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
