Dow to 4000 ??

[rnen]

6000… 4000 what’s the big deal? Obama says we dont need to concern ourselves with the pesky day to day fluctations in the DOW.

Gawd, people get bent out of shape over the smallest things.

Go Obama!

[Rt.66]

[quote=Enorah]That is pretty sharp there, Josh, that bit about the lies and fraud.

Venus goes retrograde tomorrow. That may facilitate the light shining on the truth from an astrological perspective. [/quote]

Does that mean we will finally get to see just what is sitting on BofA and Citi’s books?

Iv’e been reading a lot of sources calling for 4000-5000 Dow. That will pretty much put us back to when the stock bubble started.

The best article (along with good charts) that I have seen is here:

http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2009/03/march-2-2009-we-aint-done-yet.html

On the same note:

“The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 281.40 points, or 4.09%, to 6594.44, its lowest close since April 1997. The Nasdaq Composite fell 54.15, or 4.00%, to 1299.59. The broad Standard & Poor’s 500 index shed 30.32, or 4.25%, to 682.55, 56% below its bull-market peak in October 2007. That’s the biggest drop for the market since the 1930s”

[Rt.66]

[quote=Enorah]That is pretty sharp there, Josh, that bit about the lies and fraud.

Venus goes retrograde tomorrow. That may facilitate the light shining on the truth from an astrological perspective. [/quote]

Does that mean we will finally get to see just what is sitting on BofA and Citi’s books?

Iv’e been reading a lot of sources calling for 4000-5000 Dow. That will pretty much put us back to when the stock bubble started.

The best article (along with good charts) that I have seen is here:

http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2009/03/march-2-2009-we-aint-done-yet.html

On the same note:

“The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 281.40 points, or 4.09%, to 6594.44, its lowest close since April 1997. The Nasdaq Composite fell 54.15, or 4.00%, to 1299.59. The broad Standard & Poor’s 500 index shed 30.32, or 4.25%, to 682.55, 56% below its bull-market peak in October 2007. That’s the biggest drop for the market since the 1930s”

[Rt.66]

[quote=Enorah]That is pretty sharp there, Josh, that bit about the lies and fraud.

Venus goes retrograde tomorrow. That may facilitate the light shining on the truth from an astrological perspective. [/quote]

Does that mean we will finally get to see just what is sitting on BofA and Citi’s books?

Iv’e been reading a lot of sources calling for 4000-5000 Dow. That will pretty much put us back to when the stock bubble started.

The best article (along with good charts) that I have seen is here:

http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2009/03/march-2-2009-we-aint-done-yet.html

On the same note:

“The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 281.40 points, or 4.09%, to 6594.44, its lowest close since April 1997. The Nasdaq Composite fell 54.15, or 4.00%, to 1299.59. The broad Standard & Poor’s 500 index shed 30.32, or 4.25%, to 682.55, 56% below its bull-market peak in October 2007. That’s the biggest drop for the market since the 1930s”

[Rt.66]

[quote=Enorah]That is pretty sharp there, Josh, that bit about the lies and fraud.

Venus goes retrograde tomorrow. That may facilitate the light shining on the truth from an astrological perspective. [/quote]

Does that mean we will finally get to see just what is sitting on BofA and Citi’s books?

Iv’e been reading a lot of sources calling for 4000-5000 Dow. That will pretty much put us back to when the stock bubble started.

The best article (along with good charts) that I have seen is here:

http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2009/03/march-2-2009-we-aint-done-yet.html

On the same note:

“The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 281.40 points, or 4.09%, to 6594.44, its lowest close since April 1997. The Nasdaq Composite fell 54.15, or 4.00%, to 1299.59. The broad Standard & Poor’s 500 index shed 30.32, or 4.25%, to 682.55, 56% below its bull-market peak in October 2007. That’s the biggest drop for the market since the 1930s”

[Rt.66]

[quote=Enorah]That is pretty sharp there, Josh, that bit about the lies and fraud.

Venus goes retrograde tomorrow. That may facilitate the light shining on the truth from an astrological perspective. [/quote]

Does that mean we will finally get to see just what is sitting on BofA and Citi’s books?

Iv’e been reading a lot of sources calling for 4000-5000 Dow. That will pretty much put us back to when the stock bubble started.

The best article (along with good charts) that I have seen is here:

http://theautomaticearth.blogspot.com/2009/03/march-2-2009-we-aint-done-yet.html

On the same note:

“The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 281.40 points, or 4.09%, to 6594.44, its lowest close since April 1997. The Nasdaq Composite fell 54.15, or 4.00%, to 1299.59. The broad Standard & Poor’s 500 index shed 30.32, or 4.25%, to 682.55, 56% below its bull-market peak in October 2007. That’s the biggest drop for the market since the 1930s”

[ltokuda]

[quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me.

[ltokuda]

[quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me.

[ltokuda]

[quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me.

[ltokuda]

[quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me.

[ltokuda]

[quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me.

[patientrenter]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me. [/quote]

If ps were a painter, she’d be an impressionist.

[patientrenter]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me. [/quote]

If ps were a painter, she’d be an impressionist.

[patientrenter]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me. [/quote]

If ps were a painter, she’d be an impressionist.

[patientrenter]

[quote=ltokuda][quote=barnaby33]On Wall St, early = wrong.
Josh[/quote]

PS predicted that the S&P500 would fall to 600 by the spring of ’07. Obviously, that timing was way off.

But to be fair, PS recommended buying RYURX, which is an inverse S&P500 fund. The S&P500 was at 1301 when she made the call (August 28, 2006). That investment is doing very well, to say the least.

That being said, I’ve read a lot of PS’s posts and she’s not all that credible to me. [/quote]

If ps were a painter, she’d be an impressionist.

[Author]

Posts