- This topic has 275 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 1 month ago by CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 7:18 AM #617279October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616222sdrealtorParticipant
I just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616309sdrealtorParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616859sdrealtorParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616975sdrealtorParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #617289sdrealtorParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #616277jpinpbParticipantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #616364jpinpbParticipantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #616913jpinpbParticipantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #617028jpinpbParticipantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #617343jpinpbParticipantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #616465sdrealtorParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #616551sdrealtorParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #617094sdrealtorParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #617215sdrealtorParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.