- This topic has 275 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 4 months ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2010 at 7:18 AM #617279October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616222
sdrealtor
ParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616309sdrealtor
ParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616859sdrealtor
ParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #616975sdrealtor
ParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 8:40 AM #617289sdrealtor
ParticipantI just saw some very interesting data regarding the notion that the majority of foreclosures in places like Chula Vista are in the new tracts with high Mello Roos and HOA fees. Check this out:
80% of the foreclosure activity is in homes built in 2000 or ealier which predates them to the high MR and HOA fees of the most recent construction boom.
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #616277jpinpb
Participantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #616364jpinpb
Participantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #616913jpinpb
Participantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #617028jpinpb
Participantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM #617343jpinpb
Participantsdr – why are you posting information about Chula Vista in this thread which is about scaredy buying in Temecula?
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #616465sdrealtor
ParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #616551sdrealtor
ParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #617094sdrealtor
ParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
October 12, 2010 at 11:39 AM #617215sdrealtor
ParticipantIt was for bearishgurl who was questioning his choice of living in Temecula. She has repeatedly stated that the problems are primarily the result of high MR and HOA fees in places that crashed hardest like Chula Vista and most of South Riverside county. I will admit that i thought she was probably right that the highest default rates were in those new high fee communities. That graph seems to throw cold water on that assumption.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.