Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Does anyone know if our lease is even legal?
- This topic has 30 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by PCinSD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 23, 2010 at 2:30 PM #517709February 23, 2010 at 3:17 PM #517202PCinSDGuest
Fredo,
Your lease is legal, it’s just a month to month. You can prove your lease by showing your payment history, mail, etc.
I don’t see why your landlord would agree to enter into a new written lease with you. Why bother?
Check this site out for some good info as to what rights you have:
It appears that your lease (written or otherwise) is subject to a 30 day notice to terminate by the prospective new owner.
February 23, 2010 at 3:17 PM #517982PCinSDGuestFredo,
Your lease is legal, it’s just a month to month. You can prove your lease by showing your payment history, mail, etc.
I don’t see why your landlord would agree to enter into a new written lease with you. Why bother?
Check this site out for some good info as to what rights you have:
It appears that your lease (written or otherwise) is subject to a 30 day notice to terminate by the prospective new owner.
February 23, 2010 at 3:17 PM #517061PCinSDGuestFredo,
Your lease is legal, it’s just a month to month. You can prove your lease by showing your payment history, mail, etc.
I don’t see why your landlord would agree to enter into a new written lease with you. Why bother?
Check this site out for some good info as to what rights you have:
It appears that your lease (written or otherwise) is subject to a 30 day notice to terminate by the prospective new owner.
February 23, 2010 at 3:17 PM #517636PCinSDGuestFredo,
Your lease is legal, it’s just a month to month. You can prove your lease by showing your payment history, mail, etc.
I don’t see why your landlord would agree to enter into a new written lease with you. Why bother?
Check this site out for some good info as to what rights you have:
It appears that your lease (written or otherwise) is subject to a 30 day notice to terminate by the prospective new owner.
February 23, 2010 at 3:17 PM #517729PCinSDGuestFredo,
Your lease is legal, it’s just a month to month. You can prove your lease by showing your payment history, mail, etc.
I don’t see why your landlord would agree to enter into a new written lease with you. Why bother?
Check this site out for some good info as to what rights you have:
It appears that your lease (written or otherwise) is subject to a 30 day notice to terminate by the prospective new owner.
February 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM #517110DataAgentParticipantPablo… there’s a newer law:
http://www.nlihc.org/doc/701-704-Public-Law-111-22.pdfHe’s not month-to-month. The tenant just needs to prove he has an existing lease.
February 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM #518032DataAgentParticipantPablo… there’s a newer law:
http://www.nlihc.org/doc/701-704-Public-Law-111-22.pdfHe’s not month-to-month. The tenant just needs to prove he has an existing lease.
February 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM #517780DataAgentParticipantPablo… there’s a newer law:
http://www.nlihc.org/doc/701-704-Public-Law-111-22.pdfHe’s not month-to-month. The tenant just needs to prove he has an existing lease.
February 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM #517686DataAgentParticipantPablo… there’s a newer law:
http://www.nlihc.org/doc/701-704-Public-Law-111-22.pdfHe’s not month-to-month. The tenant just needs to prove he has an existing lease.
February 23, 2010 at 4:05 PM #517252DataAgentParticipantPablo… there’s a newer law:
http://www.nlihc.org/doc/701-704-Public-Law-111-22.pdfHe’s not month-to-month. The tenant just needs to prove he has an existing lease.
February 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM #517789PCinSDGuestAh, good catch DataAgent. You guys should get 90 days notice to vacate now.
By month to month, I mean that under CA law, if you don’t have a written lease for a specific term (which Fredo doesn’t) – then by default you have a month to month tenancy. That does not change the 90 day notice requirement, tho.
February 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM #517696PCinSDGuestAh, good catch DataAgent. You guys should get 90 days notice to vacate now.
By month to month, I mean that under CA law, if you don’t have a written lease for a specific term (which Fredo doesn’t) – then by default you have a month to month tenancy. That does not change the 90 day notice requirement, tho.
February 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM #517262PCinSDGuestAh, good catch DataAgent. You guys should get 90 days notice to vacate now.
By month to month, I mean that under CA law, if you don’t have a written lease for a specific term (which Fredo doesn’t) – then by default you have a month to month tenancy. That does not change the 90 day notice requirement, tho.
February 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM #517120PCinSDGuestAh, good catch DataAgent. You guys should get 90 days notice to vacate now.
By month to month, I mean that under CA law, if you don’t have a written lease for a specific term (which Fredo doesn’t) – then by default you have a month to month tenancy. That does not change the 90 day notice requirement, tho.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.