Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Distribution of Wealth in SD County
- This topic has 715 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 5 months ago by jimmyle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM #553368May 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM #552407flyerParticipant
More interesting info!
Even though we did acquire property as I mentioned before, we do still work. Both my wife and I have been airline pilots for the past 20 years, so I guess that puts us in the top tier of household income, per your charts. Frankly, quite surprised at the low percentage rate in this category in San Diego.
May 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM #552513flyerParticipantMore interesting info!
Even though we did acquire property as I mentioned before, we do still work. Both my wife and I have been airline pilots for the past 20 years, so I guess that puts us in the top tier of household income, per your charts. Frankly, quite surprised at the low percentage rate in this category in San Diego.
May 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM #553001flyerParticipantMore interesting info!
Even though we did acquire property as I mentioned before, we do still work. Both my wife and I have been airline pilots for the past 20 years, so I guess that puts us in the top tier of household income, per your charts. Frankly, quite surprised at the low percentage rate in this category in San Diego.
May 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM #553100flyerParticipantMore interesting info!
Even though we did acquire property as I mentioned before, we do still work. Both my wife and I have been airline pilots for the past 20 years, so I guess that puts us in the top tier of household income, per your charts. Frankly, quite surprised at the low percentage rate in this category in San Diego.
May 20, 2010 at 3:20 PM #553378flyerParticipantMore interesting info!
Even though we did acquire property as I mentioned before, we do still work. Both my wife and I have been airline pilots for the past 20 years, so I guess that puts us in the top tier of household income, per your charts. Frankly, quite surprised at the low percentage rate in this category in San Diego.
May 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM #552427sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Then again, asking you to read beyond the literal is just asking for way too much.[/quote]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.
May 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM #552534sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Then again, asking you to read beyond the literal is just asking for way too much.[/quote]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.
May 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM #553021sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Then again, asking you to read beyond the literal is just asking for way too much.[/quote]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.
May 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM #553120sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Then again, asking you to read beyond the literal is just asking for way too much.[/quote]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.
May 20, 2010 at 4:38 PM #553396sdcellarParticipant[quote=AN]Then again, asking you to read beyond the literal is just asking for way too much.[/quote]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.
May 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM #552437anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.[/quote]
Run your own number and tell me. Everything I say cause your BS meter points to yes anyways, so I guess nothing true ever comes out of my mouth. So why even bother reading what I say?What’s typical? A 4-5 years experienced RN making $75k/yr.? Ask a few RN yourself. I know a few. Is it me saying I literally know RN couple who saved up $1.5M after 15 years or is it me saying this hypothetical couple can save up $1.5M after 15 years. Read it how you like it. But your literal meter is working at tip top shape, so you know the answer to that one already. What isn’t accurate?
May 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM #552543anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.[/quote]
Run your own number and tell me. Everything I say cause your BS meter points to yes anyways, so I guess nothing true ever comes out of my mouth. So why even bother reading what I say?What’s typical? A 4-5 years experienced RN making $75k/yr.? Ask a few RN yourself. I know a few. Is it me saying I literally know RN couple who saved up $1.5M after 15 years or is it me saying this hypothetical couple can save up $1.5M after 15 years. Read it how you like it. But your literal meter is working at tip top shape, so you know the answer to that one already. What isn’t accurate?
May 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM #553031anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.[/quote]
Run your own number and tell me. Everything I say cause your BS meter points to yes anyways, so I guess nothing true ever comes out of my mouth. So why even bother reading what I say?What’s typical? A 4-5 years experienced RN making $75k/yr.? Ask a few RN yourself. I know a few. Is it me saying I literally know RN couple who saved up $1.5M after 15 years or is it me saying this hypothetical couple can save up $1.5M after 15 years. Read it how you like it. But your literal meter is working at tip top shape, so you know the answer to that one already. What isn’t accurate?
May 20, 2010 at 4:54 PM #553130anParticipant[quote=sdcellar]I think my literalness detectors work pretty well, thank you very much. Unfortunately for you, so do my BS detectors.
Tell me, your hypothetical regarding the $150K couple saving four grand a month and amassing $1.5 million after 15 years based on 8% annual return, was that literal?
It certainly wasn’t typical and it certainly wasn’t realistic, but even more importantly, it wasn’t even accurate. It did seem quite literal though.[/quote]
Run your own number and tell me. Everything I say cause your BS meter points to yes anyways, so I guess nothing true ever comes out of my mouth. So why even bother reading what I say?What’s typical? A 4-5 years experienced RN making $75k/yr.? Ask a few RN yourself. I know a few. Is it me saying I literally know RN couple who saved up $1.5M after 15 years or is it me saying this hypothetical couple can save up $1.5M after 15 years. Read it how you like it. But your literal meter is working at tip top shape, so you know the answer to that one already. What isn’t accurate?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.