Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Disconnect
- This topic has 10 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2009 at 7:26 AM #16627November 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM #479400
sdduuuude
ParticipantThe disconnect is not what banks are “allowed” to pay their people. They should be allowed to pay them whatever they want to maintain profitability.
The disconnect is that they are not allowed to fail when they pay their people too much to do things that would (without bailout money) run the company into the ground.
Take away their safety net and watch the salaries dry up.
November 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM #479570sdduuuude
ParticipantThe disconnect is not what banks are “allowed” to pay their people. They should be allowed to pay them whatever they want to maintain profitability.
The disconnect is that they are not allowed to fail when they pay their people too much to do things that would (without bailout money) run the company into the ground.
Take away their safety net and watch the salaries dry up.
November 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM #479932sdduuuude
ParticipantThe disconnect is not what banks are “allowed” to pay their people. They should be allowed to pay them whatever they want to maintain profitability.
The disconnect is that they are not allowed to fail when they pay their people too much to do things that would (without bailout money) run the company into the ground.
Take away their safety net and watch the salaries dry up.
November 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM #480014sdduuuude
ParticipantThe disconnect is not what banks are “allowed” to pay their people. They should be allowed to pay them whatever they want to maintain profitability.
The disconnect is that they are not allowed to fail when they pay their people too much to do things that would (without bailout money) run the company into the ground.
Take away their safety net and watch the salaries dry up.
November 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM #480238sdduuuude
ParticipantThe disconnect is not what banks are “allowed” to pay their people. They should be allowed to pay them whatever they want to maintain profitability.
The disconnect is that they are not allowed to fail when they pay their people too much to do things that would (without bailout money) run the company into the ground.
Take away their safety net and watch the salaries dry up.
November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM #479881Anonymous
GuestExactly– this is what Buffett’s trying to tell people: carrots and sticks. You need to have disincentives as well as incentives if you want to change business behavior.
November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM #480049Anonymous
GuestExactly– this is what Buffett’s trying to tell people: carrots and sticks. You need to have disincentives as well as incentives if you want to change business behavior.
November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM #480408Anonymous
GuestExactly– this is what Buffett’s trying to tell people: carrots and sticks. You need to have disincentives as well as incentives if you want to change business behavior.
November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM #480487Anonymous
GuestExactly– this is what Buffett’s trying to tell people: carrots and sticks. You need to have disincentives as well as incentives if you want to change business behavior.
November 10, 2009 at 10:08 AM #480710Anonymous
GuestExactly– this is what Buffett’s trying to tell people: carrots and sticks. You need to have disincentives as well as incentives if you want to change business behavior.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.