Did Ya Feel the Earthquake?

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

[quote=BKinLA]Looks like it’s been downgraded to a 5.4 magnitude.

Of course, the 5.8 factor still applies to the impact on the So Cal housing market as a result of the tremor. “Honey, pack your bags. We’re going back to Kansas!”
[/quote]

The odd thing is that they are about 3 times as likely to die in a tornado in Kansas than an earthquake in LA.

In the past 20 years about 50 people have died in tornados in the state of Kansas, population 2.7 Million. A rate of 18 per million people.

IN the past 20 years about 72 people have died as a result of earthquake in the Los Angeles Metro area, population 12.8 million. .
A rate of 5.6 per million people.

[Eugene]

The odd thing is that they are about 3 times as likely to die in a tornado in Kansas than an earthquake in LA.

What about their chance to become homeless?

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

LA may be fine, but San Bernardino and Palm Springs sit directly on top of the fault. Last time we had a 7.0 in a populated area in the U.S., 63 people died and around 20,000 buildings were damaged.

[Eugene]

The odd thing is that they are about 3 times as likely to die in a tornado in Kansas than an earthquake in LA.

What about their chance to become homeless?

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

LA may be fine, but San Bernardino and Palm Springs sit directly on top of the fault. Last time we had a 7.0 in a populated area in the U.S., 63 people died and around 20,000 buildings were damaged.

[Eugene]

The odd thing is that they are about 3 times as likely to die in a tornado in Kansas than an earthquake in LA.

What about their chance to become homeless?

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

LA may be fine, but San Bernardino and Palm Springs sit directly on top of the fault. Last time we had a 7.0 in a populated area in the U.S., 63 people died and around 20,000 buildings were damaged.

[Eugene]

The odd thing is that they are about 3 times as likely to die in a tornado in Kansas than an earthquake in LA.

What about their chance to become homeless?

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

LA may be fine, but San Bernardino and Palm Springs sit directly on top of the fault. Last time we had a 7.0 in a populated area in the U.S., 63 people died and around 20,000 buildings were damaged.

[Eugene]

The odd thing is that they are about 3 times as likely to die in a tornado in Kansas than an earthquake in LA.

What about their chance to become homeless?

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

LA may be fine, but San Bernardino and Palm Springs sit directly on top of the fault. Last time we had a 7.0 in a populated area in the U.S., 63 people died and around 20,000 buildings were damaged.

[seattle-relo]

Man, I missed it! I’m in Missouri right now.

I was in Seattle during the Nisqually quake (2001), it was a 6.8 – oh yeah, and I was in the hospital in active labor when it happened.

[seattle-relo]

Man, I missed it! I’m in Missouri right now.

I was in Seattle during the Nisqually quake (2001), it was a 6.8 – oh yeah, and I was in the hospital in active labor when it happened.

[seattle-relo]

Man, I missed it! I’m in Missouri right now.

I was in Seattle during the Nisqually quake (2001), it was a 6.8 – oh yeah, and I was in the hospital in active labor when it happened.

[seattle-relo]

Man, I missed it! I’m in Missouri right now.

I was in Seattle during the Nisqually quake (2001), it was a 6.8 – oh yeah, and I was in the hospital in active labor when it happened.

[seattle-relo]

Man, I missed it! I’m in Missouri right now.

I was in Seattle during the Nisqually quake (2001), it was a 6.8 – oh yeah, and I was in the hospital in active labor when it happened.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

What about their chance to become homeless?

Personally, I’d rather be temporarily homeless than permanently dead. But that’s just me.

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

I saw the same prediction of the big one within 30 years on a May 1977 episode of “In Search Of: Earthquakes” narrated by Leonard Nimoy.

Anyway, people are usually more afraid of the more rare threats (e.g. shark attacks, earthquakes, terrorist attacks) than the more common ones (car accidents, smoking, hit by a falling coconut) whereas the more common event usually tend to be far more damaging.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

What about their chance to become homeless?

Personally, I’d rather be temporarily homeless than permanently dead. But that’s just me.

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

I saw the same prediction of the big one within 30 years on a May 1977 episode of “In Search Of: Earthquakes” narrated by Leonard Nimoy.

Anyway, people are usually more afraid of the more rare threats (e.g. shark attacks, earthquakes, terrorist attacks) than the more common ones (car accidents, smoking, hit by a falling coconut) whereas the more common event usually tend to be far more damaging.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

What about their chance to become homeless?

Personally, I’d rather be temporarily homeless than permanently dead. But that’s just me.

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

I saw the same prediction of the big one within 30 years on a May 1977 episode of “In Search Of: Earthquakes” narrated by Leonard Nimoy.

Anyway, people are usually more afraid of the more rare threats (e.g. shark attacks, earthquakes, terrorist attacks) than the more common ones (car accidents, smoking, hit by a falling coconut) whereas the more common event usually tend to be far more damaging.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

What about their chance to become homeless?

Personally, I’d rather be temporarily homeless than permanently dead. But that’s just me.

There was a study a couple of years ago by UCLA. They’ve concluded that a 7.0+ is likely to happen in the next 30 years somewhere along San Andreas Fault in Southern California.

I saw the same prediction of the big one within 30 years on a May 1977 episode of “In Search Of: Earthquakes” narrated by Leonard Nimoy.

Anyway, people are usually more afraid of the more rare threats (e.g. shark attacks, earthquakes, terrorist attacks) than the more common ones (car accidents, smoking, hit by a falling coconut) whereas the more common event usually tend to be far more damaging.

[Author]

Posts