Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Dianne Feinstein’s Response to the Bailout
- This topic has 125 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
CA renter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 28, 2008 at 6:13 PM #277109September 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM #276888
equalizer
ParticipantUR,
Why dont you ask the NY Congressional delegation who has been lobbying them? Do you think Hillary has been doing nothing? Cramer and his NYC pals have been lobbying hard for this plan. And the plan does benefit NY greatly.
September 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM #277145ParticipantUR,
Why dont you ask the NY Congressional delegation who has been lobbying them? Do you think Hillary has been doing nothing? Cramer and his NYC pals have been lobbying hard for this plan. And the plan does benefit NY greatly.
September 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM #277162ParticipantUR,
Why dont you ask the NY Congressional delegation who has been lobbying them? Do you think Hillary has been doing nothing? Cramer and his NYC pals have been lobbying hard for this plan. And the plan does benefit NY greatly.
September 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM #277196ParticipantUR,
Why dont you ask the NY Congressional delegation who has been lobbying them? Do you think Hillary has been doing nothing? Cramer and his NYC pals have been lobbying hard for this plan. And the plan does benefit NY greatly.
September 28, 2008 at 10:01 PM #277209ParticipantUR,
Why dont you ask the NY Congressional delegation who has been lobbying them? Do you think Hillary has been doing nothing? Cramer and his NYC pals have been lobbying hard for this plan. And the plan does benefit NY greatly.
September 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM #276893DWCAP
Participant[quote=Ricechex]
My constituents by the thousands have made their views clear. I believe they are responding to the original 3-page proposal by the Secretary of the Treasury. It is clear by now that that 3-page proposal is a nonstarter. It is dead on arrival and that is good. [/quote]I sure am glad that she is able to see what her constituents want. Funny that it isn’t what they are actually saying. Notice how she can talk about how thousands are saying no, but only to proposals that are already dead. What great spin, they are all saying no to a yes to a no to a yes…… (around and around we go!)
September 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM #277150Participant[quote=Ricechex]
My constituents by the thousands have made their views clear. I believe they are responding to the original 3-page proposal by the Secretary of the Treasury. It is clear by now that that 3-page proposal is a nonstarter. It is dead on arrival and that is good. [/quote]I sure am glad that she is able to see what her constituents want. Funny that it isn’t what they are actually saying. Notice how she can talk about how thousands are saying no, but only to proposals that are already dead. What great spin, they are all saying no to a yes to a no to a yes…… (around and around we go!)
September 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM #277167Participant[quote=Ricechex]
My constituents by the thousands have made their views clear. I believe they are responding to the original 3-page proposal by the Secretary of the Treasury. It is clear by now that that 3-page proposal is a nonstarter. It is dead on arrival and that is good. [/quote]I sure am glad that she is able to see what her constituents want. Funny that it isn’t what they are actually saying. Notice how she can talk about how thousands are saying no, but only to proposals that are already dead. What great spin, they are all saying no to a yes to a no to a yes…… (around and around we go!)
September 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM #277202Participant[quote=Ricechex]
My constituents by the thousands have made their views clear. I believe they are responding to the original 3-page proposal by the Secretary of the Treasury. It is clear by now that that 3-page proposal is a nonstarter. It is dead on arrival and that is good. [/quote]I sure am glad that she is able to see what her constituents want. Funny that it isn’t what they are actually saying. Notice how she can talk about how thousands are saying no, but only to proposals that are already dead. What great spin, they are all saying no to a yes to a no to a yes…… (around and around we go!)
September 28, 2008 at 10:04 PM #277214Participant[quote=Ricechex]
My constituents by the thousands have made their views clear. I believe they are responding to the original 3-page proposal by the Secretary of the Treasury. It is clear by now that that 3-page proposal is a nonstarter. It is dead on arrival and that is good. [/quote]I sure am glad that she is able to see what her constituents want. Funny that it isn’t what they are actually saying. Notice how she can talk about how thousands are saying no, but only to proposals that are already dead. What great spin, they are all saying no to a yes to a no to a yes…… (around and around we go!)
September 28, 2008 at 10:31 PM #276908ParticipantSen. Dianne Feinstein
Her hubby had $1-2 Million in Janus stock last year and $2M in deposit accounts at B of A.
189 page financial disclosure report
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/congress/fin_dis/2006/f000062.pdfCommittees: Appropriations; Intelligence; Energy and Natural Resources; Judiciary; Rules and Administration; Joint Printing.
Senate salary: $154,700.
Major assets: Ownership stake in Carlton Hotel in San Francisco valued at $5 million to $25 million; a marital blind trust, $1 million to $5 million; annual pension income from city of San Francisco of $43,138; Tahoe condo, $500, 000 to $1 million, condo in Kauai, Hawaii, $250,000 to $500,000, both jointly owned with her husband, Richard Blum.
Liabilities: Mortgage of more than $1 million for Carlton Hotel rental property.
Miscellaneous: Her husband’s investments are valued in the tens of millions of dollars.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/06/26/BAG7B7CDMQ1.DTLSeptember 28, 2008 at 10:31 PM #277165ParticipantSen. Dianne Feinstein
Her hubby had $1-2 Million in Janus stock last year and $2M in deposit accounts at B of A.
189 page financial disclosure report
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/congress/fin_dis/2006/f000062.pdfCommittees: Appropriations; Intelligence; Energy and Natural Resources; Judiciary; Rules and Administration; Joint Printing.
Senate salary: $154,700.
Major assets: Ownership stake in Carlton Hotel in San Francisco valued at $5 million to $25 million; a marital blind trust, $1 million to $5 million; annual pension income from city of San Francisco of $43,138; Tahoe condo, $500, 000 to $1 million, condo in Kauai, Hawaii, $250,000 to $500,000, both jointly owned with her husband, Richard Blum.
Liabilities: Mortgage of more than $1 million for Carlton Hotel rental property.
Miscellaneous: Her husband’s investments are valued in the tens of millions of dollars.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/06/26/BAG7B7CDMQ1.DTLSeptember 28, 2008 at 10:31 PM #277183ParticipantSen. Dianne Feinstein
Her hubby had $1-2 Million in Janus stock last year and $2M in deposit accounts at B of A.
189 page financial disclosure report
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/congress/fin_dis/2006/f000062.pdfCommittees: Appropriations; Intelligence; Energy and Natural Resources; Judiciary; Rules and Administration; Joint Printing.
Senate salary: $154,700.
Major assets: Ownership stake in Carlton Hotel in San Francisco valued at $5 million to $25 million; a marital blind trust, $1 million to $5 million; annual pension income from city of San Francisco of $43,138; Tahoe condo, $500, 000 to $1 million, condo in Kauai, Hawaii, $250,000 to $500,000, both jointly owned with her husband, Richard Blum.
Liabilities: Mortgage of more than $1 million for Carlton Hotel rental property.
Miscellaneous: Her husband’s investments are valued in the tens of millions of dollars.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/06/26/BAG7B7CDMQ1.DTLSeptember 28, 2008 at 10:31 PM #277217ParticipantSen. Dianne Feinstein
Her hubby had $1-2 Million in Janus stock last year and $2M in deposit accounts at B of A.
189 page financial disclosure report
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/congress/fin_dis/2006/f000062.pdfCommittees: Appropriations; Intelligence; Energy and Natural Resources; Judiciary; Rules and Administration; Joint Printing.
Senate salary: $154,700.
Major assets: Ownership stake in Carlton Hotel in San Francisco valued at $5 million to $25 million; a marital blind trust, $1 million to $5 million; annual pension income from city of San Francisco of $43,138; Tahoe condo, $500, 000 to $1 million, condo in Kauai, Hawaii, $250,000 to $500,000, both jointly owned with her husband, Richard Blum.
Liabilities: Mortgage of more than $1 million for Carlton Hotel rental property.
Miscellaneous: Her husband’s investments are valued in the tens of millions of dollars.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/06/26/BAG7B7CDMQ1.DTL -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.