Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Detroit’s Unemployment Rate Is Nearly 50%
- This topic has 155 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 11 months ago by equalizer.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 17, 2009 at 10:57 AM #495805December 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM #494946investorParticipant
I have tried to get my family in michigan to move out for the past 25 years. If someone cannot see the writing on the wall, …..
December 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM #495104investorParticipantI have tried to get my family in michigan to move out for the past 25 years. If someone cannot see the writing on the wall, …..
December 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM #495487investorParticipantI have tried to get my family in michigan to move out for the past 25 years. If someone cannot see the writing on the wall, …..
December 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM #495574investorParticipantI have tried to get my family in michigan to move out for the past 25 years. If someone cannot see the writing on the wall, …..
December 17, 2009 at 11:04 AM #495815investorParticipantI have tried to get my family in michigan to move out for the past 25 years. If someone cannot see the writing on the wall, …..
December 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM #494990Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=Arraya]Among those omitted: part-time workers who are looking for full-time jobs and frustrated job seekers who abandon their job search altogether.[/quote]
These two groups are rightfully omitted. Part-time workers who want to work full-time are not unemployed. The argument could be made that they are under employed, but certainly not unemployed.
Finally, people who do not work and are not looking for work are, by definition, not part of the labor force. The unemployment rate would be meaningless if those in the numerator (number of unmeployed persons) are not also counted in the denominator (the labor force).
December 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM #495148Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=Arraya]Among those omitted: part-time workers who are looking for full-time jobs and frustrated job seekers who abandon their job search altogether.[/quote]
These two groups are rightfully omitted. Part-time workers who want to work full-time are not unemployed. The argument could be made that they are under employed, but certainly not unemployed.
Finally, people who do not work and are not looking for work are, by definition, not part of the labor force. The unemployment rate would be meaningless if those in the numerator (number of unmeployed persons) are not also counted in the denominator (the labor force).
December 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM #495531Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=Arraya]Among those omitted: part-time workers who are looking for full-time jobs and frustrated job seekers who abandon their job search altogether.[/quote]
These two groups are rightfully omitted. Part-time workers who want to work full-time are not unemployed. The argument could be made that they are under employed, but certainly not unemployed.
Finally, people who do not work and are not looking for work are, by definition, not part of the labor force. The unemployment rate would be meaningless if those in the numerator (number of unmeployed persons) are not also counted in the denominator (the labor force).
December 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM #495617Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=Arraya]Among those omitted: part-time workers who are looking for full-time jobs and frustrated job seekers who abandon their job search altogether.[/quote]
These two groups are rightfully omitted. Part-time workers who want to work full-time are not unemployed. The argument could be made that they are under employed, but certainly not unemployed.
Finally, people who do not work and are not looking for work are, by definition, not part of the labor force. The unemployment rate would be meaningless if those in the numerator (number of unmeployed persons) are not also counted in the denominator (the labor force).
December 17, 2009 at 12:46 PM #495860Diego MamaniParticipant[quote=Arraya]Among those omitted: part-time workers who are looking for full-time jobs and frustrated job seekers who abandon their job search altogether.[/quote]
These two groups are rightfully omitted. Part-time workers who want to work full-time are not unemployed. The argument could be made that they are under employed, but certainly not unemployed.
Finally, people who do not work and are not looking for work are, by definition, not part of the labor force. The unemployment rate would be meaningless if those in the numerator (number of unmeployed persons) are not also counted in the denominator (the labor force).
December 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM #495009CascaParticipantI know a bit about Detroit. Been into the city a few times on business. It is the a$$hole of North America. My guess is that these numbers reflect the city, and not the surrounding metro area.
I used to drive down Grand Ave, and marvel at the once proud mansions with sheets covering the windows.
This is what you get when socialism is liberally applied. The smart people vote with their feet, Atlas Shruggs if you will, and the parasites have the world fall on them. Imagine what the place would be like if the feds quit sending them money.
Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. God bless Coleman Young, Nancy Pelosi, and all of the collective idiots who ever voted for them.
December 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM #495167CascaParticipantI know a bit about Detroit. Been into the city a few times on business. It is the a$$hole of North America. My guess is that these numbers reflect the city, and not the surrounding metro area.
I used to drive down Grand Ave, and marvel at the once proud mansions with sheets covering the windows.
This is what you get when socialism is liberally applied. The smart people vote with their feet, Atlas Shruggs if you will, and the parasites have the world fall on them. Imagine what the place would be like if the feds quit sending them money.
Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. God bless Coleman Young, Nancy Pelosi, and all of the collective idiots who ever voted for them.
December 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM #495551CascaParticipantI know a bit about Detroit. Been into the city a few times on business. It is the a$$hole of North America. My guess is that these numbers reflect the city, and not the surrounding metro area.
I used to drive down Grand Ave, and marvel at the once proud mansions with sheets covering the windows.
This is what you get when socialism is liberally applied. The smart people vote with their feet, Atlas Shruggs if you will, and the parasites have the world fall on them. Imagine what the place would be like if the feds quit sending them money.
Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. God bless Coleman Young, Nancy Pelosi, and all of the collective idiots who ever voted for them.
December 17, 2009 at 1:45 PM #495636CascaParticipantI know a bit about Detroit. Been into the city a few times on business. It is the a$$hole of North America. My guess is that these numbers reflect the city, and not the surrounding metro area.
I used to drive down Grand Ave, and marvel at the once proud mansions with sheets covering the windows.
This is what you get when socialism is liberally applied. The smart people vote with their feet, Atlas Shruggs if you will, and the parasites have the world fall on them. Imagine what the place would be like if the feds quit sending them money.
Detroit is the posterchild for what the Dems/left want to do to America. God bless Coleman Young, Nancy Pelosi, and all of the collective idiots who ever voted for them.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.